Yield and Water Productivity Simulation of Different Rice Cultivars under Various Planting Methods using AquaCrop, CropSyst and WOFOST Models

Simulation of rice yield and its water productivity studied using AquaCrop, WOFOST and CropSyst models, in an experiment at Khuzestan Agricultural Research Station. In this study, three types of planting methods (D1: transplanting, D2: direct seeding, and D3: dry bed seeding) and three rice cultivar...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seyed Amir Hossein Mousavi, Aslan Egdernezhad, Abdolali Gilani
Formato: article
Lenguaje:FA
Publicado: Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch 2021
Materias:
S
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d21bd58e6e94444fa6f6f5dcbe135563
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d21bd58e6e94444fa6f6f5dcbe135563
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d21bd58e6e94444fa6f6f5dcbe1355632021-11-09T06:01:55ZYield and Water Productivity Simulation of Different Rice Cultivars under Various Planting Methods using AquaCrop, CropSyst and WOFOST Models2538-18222476-731X10.30495/jcep.2021.683383https://doaj.org/article/d21bd58e6e94444fa6f6f5dcbe1355632021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jcep.iaut.ac.ir/article_683383_67a3d6cd2910700c2dd7a52a9a26e224.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2538-1822https://doaj.org/toc/2476-731XSimulation of rice yield and its water productivity studied using AquaCrop, WOFOST and CropSyst models, in an experiment at Khuzestan Agricultural Research Station. In this study, three types of planting methods (D1: transplanting, D2: direct seeding, and D3: dry bed seeding) and three rice cultivars (V1: Red-Anbori, V2: Champa, V3: Danial) were considered. Results of MBE (0.36 t.ha-1), RMSE (0.1.07 t.ha-1) and NRMSE (0.14 t.ha-1). MBE, RMSE and NRMSE values for water productivity calculated by using AquaCrop model were -0.11 kg.m-3, 0.40 kg.m-3 and 0.15, respectively. The values for yield simulation using WOFSOT model were 0.06 ton.ha-1, 1.14 t.ha-1 and -0.01, respectively, and aforementioned values for water productivity simulated by WOFOST were 0.15 kg.m-3, 0.40 kg.m-3 and -0.13, respectively. The mentioned values for CropSyst simulated as 0.11 t.ha-1, 0.80 t.ha-1 and -0.24 for yield and 0.15 kg.m-3, 0.40 kg.m-3 and -0.14 for water productivity, respectively. According to the results, accuracy for all models were accepted to simulate rice yield and water productivity. However, WOFOST accuracy was better than the other models in most treatments. Thus, it is recommended to use WOFOST for simulation of rice yield and water productivity at different rice cultivars.Seyed Amir Hossein MousaviAslan EgdernezhadAbdolali GilaniIslamic Azad University, Tabriz Brancharticlecarbon- driven modelcrop modelingdry bed seedingradiation-driven modelwater-driven modelAgricultureSAgriculture (General)S1-972FAIkufīziyuluzhī-i Giyāhān-i Zirā̒ī, Vol 15, Iss 2 (58) تابستان, Pp 221-228 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language FA
topic carbon- driven model
crop modeling
dry bed seeding
radiation-driven model
water-driven model
Agriculture
S
Agriculture (General)
S1-972
spellingShingle carbon- driven model
crop modeling
dry bed seeding
radiation-driven model
water-driven model
Agriculture
S
Agriculture (General)
S1-972
Seyed Amir Hossein Mousavi
Aslan Egdernezhad
Abdolali Gilani
Yield and Water Productivity Simulation of Different Rice Cultivars under Various Planting Methods using AquaCrop, CropSyst and WOFOST Models
description Simulation of rice yield and its water productivity studied using AquaCrop, WOFOST and CropSyst models, in an experiment at Khuzestan Agricultural Research Station. In this study, three types of planting methods (D1: transplanting, D2: direct seeding, and D3: dry bed seeding) and three rice cultivars (V1: Red-Anbori, V2: Champa, V3: Danial) were considered. Results of MBE (0.36 t.ha-1), RMSE (0.1.07 t.ha-1) and NRMSE (0.14 t.ha-1). MBE, RMSE and NRMSE values for water productivity calculated by using AquaCrop model were -0.11 kg.m-3, 0.40 kg.m-3 and 0.15, respectively. The values for yield simulation using WOFSOT model were 0.06 ton.ha-1, 1.14 t.ha-1 and -0.01, respectively, and aforementioned values for water productivity simulated by WOFOST were 0.15 kg.m-3, 0.40 kg.m-3 and -0.13, respectively. The mentioned values for CropSyst simulated as 0.11 t.ha-1, 0.80 t.ha-1 and -0.24 for yield and 0.15 kg.m-3, 0.40 kg.m-3 and -0.14 for water productivity, respectively. According to the results, accuracy for all models were accepted to simulate rice yield and water productivity. However, WOFOST accuracy was better than the other models in most treatments. Thus, it is recommended to use WOFOST for simulation of rice yield and water productivity at different rice cultivars.
format article
author Seyed Amir Hossein Mousavi
Aslan Egdernezhad
Abdolali Gilani
author_facet Seyed Amir Hossein Mousavi
Aslan Egdernezhad
Abdolali Gilani
author_sort Seyed Amir Hossein Mousavi
title Yield and Water Productivity Simulation of Different Rice Cultivars under Various Planting Methods using AquaCrop, CropSyst and WOFOST Models
title_short Yield and Water Productivity Simulation of Different Rice Cultivars under Various Planting Methods using AquaCrop, CropSyst and WOFOST Models
title_full Yield and Water Productivity Simulation of Different Rice Cultivars under Various Planting Methods using AquaCrop, CropSyst and WOFOST Models
title_fullStr Yield and Water Productivity Simulation of Different Rice Cultivars under Various Planting Methods using AquaCrop, CropSyst and WOFOST Models
title_full_unstemmed Yield and Water Productivity Simulation of Different Rice Cultivars under Various Planting Methods using AquaCrop, CropSyst and WOFOST Models
title_sort yield and water productivity simulation of different rice cultivars under various planting methods using aquacrop, cropsyst and wofost models
publisher Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d21bd58e6e94444fa6f6f5dcbe135563
work_keys_str_mv AT seyedamirhosseinmousavi yieldandwaterproductivitysimulationofdifferentricecultivarsundervariousplantingmethodsusingaquacropcropsystandwofostmodels
AT aslanegdernezhad yieldandwaterproductivitysimulationofdifferentricecultivarsundervariousplantingmethodsusingaquacropcropsystandwofostmodels
AT abdolaligilani yieldandwaterproductivitysimulationofdifferentricecultivarsundervariousplantingmethodsusingaquacropcropsystandwofostmodels
_version_ 1718441335112859648