Partner Power: A study of two distance education consortia

This research reports findings from a study which explored the process and criteria of partner selection – how and why partners are chosen – for two distance education consortia. The researchers reviewed recent literature on partnerships and partner selection. Two Canada-wide distance education cons...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anne Banks Pidduck, Tom Carey
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d2315e22b1414966a1c59a80d94d792c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d2315e22b1414966a1c59a80d94d792c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d2315e22b1414966a1c59a80d94d792c2021-12-02T19:20:40ZPartner Power: A study of two distance education consortia10.19173/irrodl.v7i3.3301492-3831https://doaj.org/article/d2315e22b1414966a1c59a80d94d792c2006-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/330https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831This research reports findings from a study which explored the process and criteria of partner selection – how and why partners are chosen – for two distance education consortia. The researchers reviewed recent literature on partnerships and partner selection. Two Canada-wide distance education consortia were identified as large-scale case studies for investigation of the research theory. A total of 34 informants were contacted. Written business plans, contracts, documents, partner network diagrams, and 231 archival emails from 36 correspondents were collected and analyzed for the two consortia. The research identified four criteria that influence why specific partners are chosen: requirements, resource availability, social network, and reputation. These findings suggest that the formation of partnerships and the process of partner selection are both very complex.Anne Banks PidduckTom CareyAthabasca University Pressarticledistance educationhigher educatione-learningonline learningSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 7, Iss 3 (2006)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic distance education
higher education
e-learning
online learning
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle distance education
higher education
e-learning
online learning
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Anne Banks Pidduck
Tom Carey
Partner Power: A study of two distance education consortia
description This research reports findings from a study which explored the process and criteria of partner selection – how and why partners are chosen – for two distance education consortia. The researchers reviewed recent literature on partnerships and partner selection. Two Canada-wide distance education consortia were identified as large-scale case studies for investigation of the research theory. A total of 34 informants were contacted. Written business plans, contracts, documents, partner network diagrams, and 231 archival emails from 36 correspondents were collected and analyzed for the two consortia. The research identified four criteria that influence why specific partners are chosen: requirements, resource availability, social network, and reputation. These findings suggest that the formation of partnerships and the process of partner selection are both very complex.
format article
author Anne Banks Pidduck
Tom Carey
author_facet Anne Banks Pidduck
Tom Carey
author_sort Anne Banks Pidduck
title Partner Power: A study of two distance education consortia
title_short Partner Power: A study of two distance education consortia
title_full Partner Power: A study of two distance education consortia
title_fullStr Partner Power: A study of two distance education consortia
title_full_unstemmed Partner Power: A study of two distance education consortia
title_sort partner power: a study of two distance education consortia
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2006
url https://doaj.org/article/d2315e22b1414966a1c59a80d94d792c
work_keys_str_mv AT annebankspidduck partnerpowerastudyoftwodistanceeducationconsortia
AT tomcarey partnerpowerastudyoftwodistanceeducationconsortia
_version_ 1718376823067246592