Solar photovoltaic power prediction using different machine learning methods
The main aim of the present study is to explore the relationship between numerous input parameters and the solar photovoltaic (PV) power using machine learning (ML) models. Two different ML approaches such as support vector machine (SVM) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) were considered and comp...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d24baf40c5bc423898ed2234b4239df8 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d24baf40c5bc423898ed2234b4239df8 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d24baf40c5bc423898ed2234b4239df82021-12-04T04:35:12ZSolar photovoltaic power prediction using different machine learning methods2352-484710.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.183https://doaj.org/article/d24baf40c5bc423898ed2234b4239df82022-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484721013287https://doaj.org/toc/2352-4847The main aim of the present study is to explore the relationship between numerous input parameters and the solar photovoltaic (PV) power using machine learning (ML) models. Two different ML approaches such as support vector machine (SVM) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) were considered and compared. The basic input parameters including solar PV panel temperature, ambient temperature, solar flux, time of the day and relative humidity were considered for predicting the solar PV power. The results showed that among the proposed ML approaches, Matern 5/2 GPR algorithm provided the optimal performance; whereas cubic SVM had the worst performance. Furthermore, the predicted output results are in good agreement with the experimental values, indicating that the proposed ML approaches are appropriate for use in predicting the power of different solar PV panel. Additionally, to showcase the effectiveness and the accuracy of SVM and GPR models in forecasting solar PV power, the results of these models are compared using root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) criteria.Bouchaib ZazoumElsevierarticleSolar energyPV panelMachine learningSupport vector machine (SVM)Gaussian process regression (GPR)Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringTK1-9971ENEnergy Reports, Vol 8, Iss , Pp 19-25 (2022) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Solar energy PV panel Machine learning Support vector machine (SVM) Gaussian process regression (GPR) Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 |
spellingShingle |
Solar energy PV panel Machine learning Support vector machine (SVM) Gaussian process regression (GPR) Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Bouchaib Zazoum Solar photovoltaic power prediction using different machine learning methods |
description |
The main aim of the present study is to explore the relationship between numerous input parameters and the solar photovoltaic (PV) power using machine learning (ML) models. Two different ML approaches such as support vector machine (SVM) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) were considered and compared. The basic input parameters including solar PV panel temperature, ambient temperature, solar flux, time of the day and relative humidity were considered for predicting the solar PV power. The results showed that among the proposed ML approaches, Matern 5/2 GPR algorithm provided the optimal performance; whereas cubic SVM had the worst performance. Furthermore, the predicted output results are in good agreement with the experimental values, indicating that the proposed ML approaches are appropriate for use in predicting the power of different solar PV panel. Additionally, to showcase the effectiveness and the accuracy of SVM and GPR models in forecasting solar PV power, the results of these models are compared using root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) criteria. |
format |
article |
author |
Bouchaib Zazoum |
author_facet |
Bouchaib Zazoum |
author_sort |
Bouchaib Zazoum |
title |
Solar photovoltaic power prediction using different machine learning methods |
title_short |
Solar photovoltaic power prediction using different machine learning methods |
title_full |
Solar photovoltaic power prediction using different machine learning methods |
title_fullStr |
Solar photovoltaic power prediction using different machine learning methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Solar photovoltaic power prediction using different machine learning methods |
title_sort |
solar photovoltaic power prediction using different machine learning methods |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d24baf40c5bc423898ed2234b4239df8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bouchaibzazoum solarphotovoltaicpowerpredictionusingdifferentmachinelearningmethods |
_version_ |
1718372941216874496 |