Maquiavel e a Literatura Pop Management: o mundo das incertezas e o convite às fantasias organizacionais

This article aims at bringing a comparative study of the works The Prince, of Niccolo Machiavelli, and The Servant, of James C. Hunter, and understand how the two books work the issue of leadership. From the analysis of the two works, we intend to show how the laboring subject occupies a central pla...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Luis Fernando Tosta Barbato, Mateus Henriques Patrício
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	PT
Publicado:	Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) 2018
Materias:	leadership pop management machiavelli human resource management Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d27ff640731f4e56b048495c32c0aa63
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d27ff640731f4e56b048495c32c0aa63
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d27ff640731f4e56b048495c32c0aa632021-11-11T15:42:02ZMaquiavel e a Literatura Pop Management: o mundo das incertezas e o convite às fantasias organizacionais2177-622910.4013/csu.2018.54.3.06https://doaj.org/article/d27ff640731f4e56b048495c32c0aa632018-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93864666005https://doaj.org/toc/2177-6229This article aims at bringing a comparative study of the works The Prince, of Niccolo Machiavelli, and The Servant, of James C. Hunter, and understand how the two books work the issue of leadership. From the analysis of the two works, we intend to show how the laboring subject occupies a central place in discussions of modern society, and to show that, although the two works in question are apparently so antagonistic in their leadership concepts, there is a series of common objectives and strategies that help us better understand the corporate world. Through the analysis of these two works, we were able to conclude that the leadership exercised by Hunter’s benevolent and servant leader, despite seeming so far from Machiavelli’s cold and rational leader, paradoxically does not avoid using the most appropriate strategies to maintain power and win the loyalty of his employees, which shows that Hunter’s conception of leadership does not fail to rely on elements characteristic of Machiavelli.Luis Fernando Tosta BarbatoMateus Henriques PatrícioUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)articleleadershippop managementmachiavellihuman resource managementSocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99PTCiências Sociais Unisinos, Vol 54, Iss 3, Pp 336-347 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	PT
topic	leadership pop management machiavelli human resource management Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	leadership pop management machiavelli human resource management Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Luis Fernando Tosta Barbato Mateus Henriques Patrício Maquiavel e a Literatura Pop Management: o mundo das incertezas e o convite às fantasias organizacionais
description	This article aims at bringing a comparative study of the works The Prince, of Niccolo Machiavelli, and The Servant, of James C. Hunter, and understand how the two books work the issue of leadership. From the analysis of the two works, we intend to show how the laboring subject occupies a central place in discussions of modern society, and to show that, although the two works in question are apparently so antagonistic in their leadership concepts, there is a series of common objectives and strategies that help us better understand the corporate world. Through the analysis of these two works, we were able to conclude that the leadership exercised by Hunter’s benevolent and servant leader, despite seeming so far from Machiavelli’s cold and rational leader, paradoxically does not avoid using the most appropriate strategies to maintain power and win the loyalty of his employees, which shows that Hunter’s conception of leadership does not fail to rely on elements characteristic of Machiavelli.
format	article
author	Luis Fernando Tosta Barbato Mateus Henriques Patrício
author_facet	Luis Fernando Tosta Barbato Mateus Henriques Patrício
author_sort	Luis Fernando Tosta Barbato
title	Maquiavel e a Literatura Pop Management: o mundo das incertezas e o convite às fantasias organizacionais
title_short	Maquiavel e a Literatura Pop Management: o mundo das incertezas e o convite às fantasias organizacionais
title_full	Maquiavel e a Literatura Pop Management: o mundo das incertezas e o convite às fantasias organizacionais
title_fullStr	Maquiavel e a Literatura Pop Management: o mundo das incertezas e o convite às fantasias organizacionais
title_full_unstemmed	Maquiavel e a Literatura Pop Management: o mundo das incertezas e o convite às fantasias organizacionais
title_sort	maquiavel e a literatura pop management: o mundo das incertezas e o convite às fantasias organizacionais
publisher	Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/d27ff640731f4e56b048495c32c0aa63
work_keys_str_mv	AT luisfernandotostabarbato maquiavelealiteraturapopmanagementomundodasincertezaseoconviteasfantasiasorganizacionais AT mateushenriquespatricio maquiavelealiteraturapopmanagementomundodasincertezaseoconviteasfantasiasorganizacionais
_version_	1718434117856526336

Maquiavel e a Literatura Pop Management: o mundo das incertezas e o convite às fantasias organizacionais

Ejemplares similares