Discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 Infections From Other Viral Respiratory Infections by Scent Detection Dogs

Background: Testing of possibly infected individuals remains cornerstone of containing the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Detection dogs could contribute to mass screening. Previous research demonstrated canines' ability to detect SARS-CoV-2-infections but has not investigated if dogs can differentiate...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nele Alexandra ten Hagen, Friederike Twele, Sebastian Meller, Paula Jendrny, Claudia Schulz, Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede, Ab Osterhaus, Hans Ebbers, Isabell Pink, Tobias Welte, Michael Peter Manns, Thomas Illig, Anahita Fathi, Marylyn Martina Addo, Andreas Nitsche, Andreas Puyskens, Janine Michel, Eva Krause, Rosina Ehmann, Albrecht von Brunn, Christiane Ernst, Katrin Zwirglmaier, Roman Wölfel, Alexandra Nau, Eva Philipp, Michael Engels, Esther Schalke, Holger Andreas Volk
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d29ef6ecffdd4eefaba7e89d9babf710
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d29ef6ecffdd4eefaba7e89d9babf710
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d29ef6ecffdd4eefaba7e89d9babf7102021-11-18T07:06:42ZDiscrimination of SARS-CoV-2 Infections From Other Viral Respiratory Infections by Scent Detection Dogs2296-858X10.3389/fmed.2021.749588https://doaj.org/article/d29ef6ecffdd4eefaba7e89d9babf7102021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.749588/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2296-858XBackground: Testing of possibly infected individuals remains cornerstone of containing the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Detection dogs could contribute to mass screening. Previous research demonstrated canines' ability to detect SARS-CoV-2-infections but has not investigated if dogs can differentiate between COVID-19 and other virus infections.Methods: Twelve dogs were trained to detect SARS-CoV-2 positive samples. Three test scenarios were performed to evaluate their ability to discriminate SARS-CoV-2-infections from viral infections of a different aetiology. Naso- and oropharyngeal swab samples from individuals and samples from cell culture both infected with one of 15 viruses that may cause COVID-19-like symptoms were presented as distractors in a randomised, double-blind study. Dogs were either trained with SARS-CoV-2 positive saliva samples (test scenario I and II) or with supernatant from cell cultures (test scenario III).Results: When using swab samples from individuals infected with viruses other than SARS-CoV-2 as distractors (test scenario I), dogs detected swab samples from SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals with a mean diagnostic sensitivity of 73.8% (95% CI: 66.0–81.7%) and a specificity of 95.1% (95% CI: 92.6–97.7%). In test scenario II and III cell culture supernatant from cells infected with SARS-CoV-2, cells infected with other coronaviruses and non-infected cells were presented. Dogs achieved mean diagnostic sensitivities of 61.2% (95% CI: 50.7–71.6%, test scenario II) and 75.8% (95% CI: 53.0–98.5%, test scenario III), respectively. The diagnostic specificities were 90.9% (95% CI: 87.3–94.6%, test scenario II) and 90.2% (95% CI: 81.1–99.4%, test scenario III), respectively.Conclusion: In all three test scenarios the mean specificities were above 90% which indicates that dogs can distinguish SARS-CoV-2-infections from other viral infections. However, compared to earlier studies our scent dogs achieved lower diagnostic sensitivities. To deploy COVID-19 detection dogs as a reliable screening method it is therefore mandatory to include a variety of samples from different viral respiratory tract infections in dog training to ensure a successful discrimination process.Nele Alexandra ten HagenFriederike TweleSebastian MellerPaula JendrnyClaudia SchulzMaren von Köckritz-BlickwedeMaren von Köckritz-BlickwedeAb OsterhausHans EbbersIsabell PinkTobias WelteMichael Peter MannsThomas IlligAnahita FathiAnahita FathiAnahita FathiMarylyn Martina AddoMarylyn Martina AddoMarylyn Martina AddoAndreas NitscheAndreas PuyskensJanine MichelEva KrauseRosina EhmannAlbrecht von BrunnAlbrecht von BrunnChristiane ErnstKatrin ZwirglmaierRoman WölfelAlexandra NauEva PhilippMichael EngelsEsther SchalkeHolger Andreas VolkFrontiers Media S.A.articlecaninevolatile organic compound (VOC)COVID-19screening testcoronavirusSARS-CoV-2Medicine (General)R5-920ENFrontiers in Medicine, Vol 8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic canine
volatile organic compound (VOC)
COVID-19
screening test
coronavirus
SARS-CoV-2
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle canine
volatile organic compound (VOC)
COVID-19
screening test
coronavirus
SARS-CoV-2
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Nele Alexandra ten Hagen
Friederike Twele
Sebastian Meller
Paula Jendrny
Claudia Schulz
Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede
Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede
Ab Osterhaus
Hans Ebbers
Isabell Pink
Tobias Welte
Michael Peter Manns
Thomas Illig
Anahita Fathi
Anahita Fathi
Anahita Fathi
Marylyn Martina Addo
Marylyn Martina Addo
Marylyn Martina Addo
Andreas Nitsche
Andreas Puyskens
Janine Michel
Eva Krause
Rosina Ehmann
Albrecht von Brunn
Albrecht von Brunn
Christiane Ernst
Katrin Zwirglmaier
Roman Wölfel
Alexandra Nau
Eva Philipp
Michael Engels
Esther Schalke
Holger Andreas Volk
Discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 Infections From Other Viral Respiratory Infections by Scent Detection Dogs
description Background: Testing of possibly infected individuals remains cornerstone of containing the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Detection dogs could contribute to mass screening. Previous research demonstrated canines' ability to detect SARS-CoV-2-infections but has not investigated if dogs can differentiate between COVID-19 and other virus infections.Methods: Twelve dogs were trained to detect SARS-CoV-2 positive samples. Three test scenarios were performed to evaluate their ability to discriminate SARS-CoV-2-infections from viral infections of a different aetiology. Naso- and oropharyngeal swab samples from individuals and samples from cell culture both infected with one of 15 viruses that may cause COVID-19-like symptoms were presented as distractors in a randomised, double-blind study. Dogs were either trained with SARS-CoV-2 positive saliva samples (test scenario I and II) or with supernatant from cell cultures (test scenario III).Results: When using swab samples from individuals infected with viruses other than SARS-CoV-2 as distractors (test scenario I), dogs detected swab samples from SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals with a mean diagnostic sensitivity of 73.8% (95% CI: 66.0–81.7%) and a specificity of 95.1% (95% CI: 92.6–97.7%). In test scenario II and III cell culture supernatant from cells infected with SARS-CoV-2, cells infected with other coronaviruses and non-infected cells were presented. Dogs achieved mean diagnostic sensitivities of 61.2% (95% CI: 50.7–71.6%, test scenario II) and 75.8% (95% CI: 53.0–98.5%, test scenario III), respectively. The diagnostic specificities were 90.9% (95% CI: 87.3–94.6%, test scenario II) and 90.2% (95% CI: 81.1–99.4%, test scenario III), respectively.Conclusion: In all three test scenarios the mean specificities were above 90% which indicates that dogs can distinguish SARS-CoV-2-infections from other viral infections. However, compared to earlier studies our scent dogs achieved lower diagnostic sensitivities. To deploy COVID-19 detection dogs as a reliable screening method it is therefore mandatory to include a variety of samples from different viral respiratory tract infections in dog training to ensure a successful discrimination process.
format article
author Nele Alexandra ten Hagen
Friederike Twele
Sebastian Meller
Paula Jendrny
Claudia Schulz
Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede
Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede
Ab Osterhaus
Hans Ebbers
Isabell Pink
Tobias Welte
Michael Peter Manns
Thomas Illig
Anahita Fathi
Anahita Fathi
Anahita Fathi
Marylyn Martina Addo
Marylyn Martina Addo
Marylyn Martina Addo
Andreas Nitsche
Andreas Puyskens
Janine Michel
Eva Krause
Rosina Ehmann
Albrecht von Brunn
Albrecht von Brunn
Christiane Ernst
Katrin Zwirglmaier
Roman Wölfel
Alexandra Nau
Eva Philipp
Michael Engels
Esther Schalke
Holger Andreas Volk
author_facet Nele Alexandra ten Hagen
Friederike Twele
Sebastian Meller
Paula Jendrny
Claudia Schulz
Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede
Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede
Ab Osterhaus
Hans Ebbers
Isabell Pink
Tobias Welte
Michael Peter Manns
Thomas Illig
Anahita Fathi
Anahita Fathi
Anahita Fathi
Marylyn Martina Addo
Marylyn Martina Addo
Marylyn Martina Addo
Andreas Nitsche
Andreas Puyskens
Janine Michel
Eva Krause
Rosina Ehmann
Albrecht von Brunn
Albrecht von Brunn
Christiane Ernst
Katrin Zwirglmaier
Roman Wölfel
Alexandra Nau
Eva Philipp
Michael Engels
Esther Schalke
Holger Andreas Volk
author_sort Nele Alexandra ten Hagen
title Discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 Infections From Other Viral Respiratory Infections by Scent Detection Dogs
title_short Discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 Infections From Other Viral Respiratory Infections by Scent Detection Dogs
title_full Discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 Infections From Other Viral Respiratory Infections by Scent Detection Dogs
title_fullStr Discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 Infections From Other Viral Respiratory Infections by Scent Detection Dogs
title_full_unstemmed Discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 Infections From Other Viral Respiratory Infections by Scent Detection Dogs
title_sort discrimination of sars-cov-2 infections from other viral respiratory infections by scent detection dogs
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d29ef6ecffdd4eefaba7e89d9babf710
work_keys_str_mv AT nelealexandratenhagen discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT friederiketwele discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT sebastianmeller discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT paulajendrny discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT claudiaschulz discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT marenvonkockritzblickwede discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT marenvonkockritzblickwede discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT abosterhaus discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT hansebbers discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT isabellpink discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT tobiaswelte discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT michaelpetermanns discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT thomasillig discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT anahitafathi discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT anahitafathi discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT anahitafathi discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT marylynmartinaaddo discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT marylynmartinaaddo discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT marylynmartinaaddo discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT andreasnitsche discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT andreaspuyskens discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT janinemichel discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT evakrause discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT rosinaehmann discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT albrechtvonbrunn discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT albrechtvonbrunn discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT christianeernst discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT katrinzwirglmaier discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT romanwolfel discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT alexandranau discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT evaphilipp discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT michaelengels discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT estherschalke discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
AT holgerandreasvolk discriminationofsarscov2infectionsfromotherviralrespiratoryinfectionsbyscentdetectiondogs
_version_ 1718423945337634816