INTRAVITAL AND POST-MORTEM DIAGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: URGENT CARDIOLOGY DEPARTMENT LETHAL CASES ANALYSIS

To estimate an accuracy of methods of myocardial infarction diagnostics (ECC, echocardiography, biomarkers) 41 case history reports of patients with Q(+) and Q(-) myocardial infarction and lethal outcome were analyzed. ECG and echocardiography were proved to be most accurate in case of anterior (67...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	O. M. Uryasev, S. B. Aksentiev, Y. A. Panfilov
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Scientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems 2015
Materias:	myocardial infarction mortality methods of diagnosis Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d318dd6889274b1a82dc15d0968cdbdb
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d318dd6889274b1a82dc15d0968cdbdb
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d318dd6889274b1a82dc15d0968cdbdb2021-11-23T06:14:33ZINTRAVITAL AND POST-MORTEM DIAGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: URGENT CARDIOLOGY DEPARTMENT LETHAL CASES ANALYSIS2541-94202587-9596https://doaj.org/article/d318dd6889274b1a82dc15d0968cdbdb2015-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.actabiomedica.ru/jour/article/view/112https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9420https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9596To estimate an accuracy of methods of myocardial infarction diagnostics (ECC, echocardiography, biomarkers) 41 case history reports of patients with Q(+) and Q(-) myocardial infarction and lethal outcome were analyzed. ECG and echocardiography were proved to be most accurate in case of anterior (67 % and 67 %), lateral (71 % and 67 %) and inferior (46 % and 79%) localizations of myocardial infarction. Interventricular septum and posterior localizations were not detected on ECG (0%). Complete coincidence of ECG and echocardiography with autopsy results was detected only in 4 %. CPC and CPC-МВ levels were elevated in 97%, troponins were positive in 70 %. Risk factors of lethal outcome in case of myocardial infarction include sex (male), comorbid pathology (arterial hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus type 2), complications (rhythm disorders, cardiogenic shock, congestive heart failure), absence of thrombolytic therapy and its inefficacy. Myocardial infarction hypo- and hyperdiagnosis were detected.O. M. UryasevS. B. AksentievY. A. PanfilovScientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problemsarticlemyocardial infarctionmortalitymethods of diagnosisScienceQRUActa Biomedica Scientifica, Vol 0, Iss 5, Pp 40-43 (2015)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	myocardial infarction mortality methods of diagnosis Science Q
spellingShingle	myocardial infarction mortality methods of diagnosis Science Q O. M. Uryasev S. B. Aksentiev Y. A. Panfilov INTRAVITAL AND POST-MORTEM DIAGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: URGENT CARDIOLOGY DEPARTMENT LETHAL CASES ANALYSIS
description	To estimate an accuracy of methods of myocardial infarction diagnostics (ECC, echocardiography, biomarkers) 41 case history reports of patients with Q(+) and Q(-) myocardial infarction and lethal outcome were analyzed. ECG and echocardiography were proved to be most accurate in case of anterior (67 % and 67 %), lateral (71 % and 67 %) and inferior (46 % and 79%) localizations of myocardial infarction. Interventricular septum and posterior localizations were not detected on ECG (0%). Complete coincidence of ECG and echocardiography with autopsy results was detected only in 4 %. CPC and CPC-МВ levels were elevated in 97%, troponins were positive in 70 %. Risk factors of lethal outcome in case of myocardial infarction include sex (male), comorbid pathology (arterial hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus type 2), complications (rhythm disorders, cardiogenic shock, congestive heart failure), absence of thrombolytic therapy and its inefficacy. Myocardial infarction hypo- and hyperdiagnosis were detected.
format	article
author	O. M. Uryasev S. B. Aksentiev Y. A. Panfilov
author_facet	O. M. Uryasev S. B. Aksentiev Y. A. Panfilov
author_sort	O. M. Uryasev
title	INTRAVITAL AND POST-MORTEM DIAGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: URGENT CARDIOLOGY DEPARTMENT LETHAL CASES ANALYSIS
title_short	INTRAVITAL AND POST-MORTEM DIAGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: URGENT CARDIOLOGY DEPARTMENT LETHAL CASES ANALYSIS
title_full	INTRAVITAL AND POST-MORTEM DIAGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: URGENT CARDIOLOGY DEPARTMENT LETHAL CASES ANALYSIS
title_fullStr	INTRAVITAL AND POST-MORTEM DIAGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: URGENT CARDIOLOGY DEPARTMENT LETHAL CASES ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed	INTRAVITAL AND POST-MORTEM DIAGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: URGENT CARDIOLOGY DEPARTMENT LETHAL CASES ANALYSIS
title_sort	intravital and post-mortem diagnosis of myocardial infarction: urgent cardiology department lethal cases analysis
publisher	Scientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems
publishDate	2015
url	https://doaj.org/article/d318dd6889274b1a82dc15d0968cdbdb
work_keys_str_mv	AT omuryasev intravitalandpostmortemdiagnosisofmyocardialinfarctionurgentcardiologydepartmentlethalcasesanalysis AT sbaksentiev intravitalandpostmortemdiagnosisofmyocardialinfarctionurgentcardiologydepartmentlethalcasesanalysis AT yapanfilov intravitalandpostmortemdiagnosisofmyocardialinfarctionurgentcardiologydepartmentlethalcasesanalysis
_version_	1718417098986749952

INTRAVITAL AND POST-MORTEM DIAGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: URGENT CARDIOLOGY DEPARTMENT LETHAL CASES ANALYSIS

Ejemplares similares