Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis
Abstract In Japan, two 0.4% sodium hyaluronate (HA)-based submucosal injection materials (SIMs) are currently used in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): MucoUp (HA-Mc) and Ksmart (HA-Ks). HA-Mc and HA-Ks have the same concentration and are, thus, construed by most endoscopists to have no differ...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d395186fb309493b8695a41d43fd622d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d395186fb309493b8695a41d43fd622d |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d395186fb309493b8695a41d43fd622d2021-12-02T15:54:01ZDifferences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis10.1038/s41598-021-85118-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/d395186fb309493b8695a41d43fd622d2021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85118-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract In Japan, two 0.4% sodium hyaluronate (HA)-based submucosal injection materials (SIMs) are currently used in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): MucoUp (HA-Mc) and Ksmart (HA-Ks). HA-Mc and HA-Ks have the same concentration and are, thus, construed by most endoscopists to have no difference. Nevertheless, visual observation conveys the impression that HA-Ks have a higher viscosity than HA-Mc, suggesting that HA-Ks performs better than HA-Mc. This study aimed to examine the differences between HA-Mc and HA-Ks. HA-Ks exhibited higher viscosity due to greater weight-average molecular weight compared with HA-Mc. HA-Ks had significantly greater submucosal elevation height (SEH) than HA-Mc; the SEH of HA-Ks-80% (80% dilution of HA-Ks) was the same as that of HA-Mc. The ESD procedure time was significantly shorter with HA-Ks than with HA-Mc (15.2 ± 4.1 vs. 19.5 ± 5.9; P = 0.049). The total injection volume for HA-Ks was significantly lower than that for HA-Mc (10.8 ± 3.6 vs. 14.4 ± 4.6; P = 0.045). However, no significant difference in these items was observed between HA-Mc and HA-Ks-80%. HA-Mc and HA-Ks were considered to be almost the same. Nonetheless, HA-Ks exhibited higher viscosity and SIM performance than HA-Mc. HA-Ks-80% had almost the same performance as HA-Mc. Thus, understanding SIM performance and characteristics requires a focus on the viscosity of SIMs.Ryohei HiroseTakuma YoshidaYuji NaitoNaoto WatanabeHikaru HashimotoSatoshi SuginoRisa BandouTomo DaidojiKen InoueOsamu DohiNaohisa YoshidaTakaaki NakayaYoshito ItohNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Ryohei Hirose Takuma Yoshida Yuji Naito Naoto Watanabe Hikaru Hashimoto Satoshi Sugino Risa Bandou Tomo Daidoji Ken Inoue Osamu Dohi Naohisa Yoshida Takaaki Nakaya Yoshito Itoh Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis |
description |
Abstract In Japan, two 0.4% sodium hyaluronate (HA)-based submucosal injection materials (SIMs) are currently used in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): MucoUp (HA-Mc) and Ksmart (HA-Ks). HA-Mc and HA-Ks have the same concentration and are, thus, construed by most endoscopists to have no difference. Nevertheless, visual observation conveys the impression that HA-Ks have a higher viscosity than HA-Mc, suggesting that HA-Ks performs better than HA-Mc. This study aimed to examine the differences between HA-Mc and HA-Ks. HA-Ks exhibited higher viscosity due to greater weight-average molecular weight compared with HA-Mc. HA-Ks had significantly greater submucosal elevation height (SEH) than HA-Mc; the SEH of HA-Ks-80% (80% dilution of HA-Ks) was the same as that of HA-Mc. The ESD procedure time was significantly shorter with HA-Ks than with HA-Mc (15.2 ± 4.1 vs. 19.5 ± 5.9; P = 0.049). The total injection volume for HA-Ks was significantly lower than that for HA-Mc (10.8 ± 3.6 vs. 14.4 ± 4.6; P = 0.045). However, no significant difference in these items was observed between HA-Mc and HA-Ks-80%. HA-Mc and HA-Ks were considered to be almost the same. Nonetheless, HA-Ks exhibited higher viscosity and SIM performance than HA-Mc. HA-Ks-80% had almost the same performance as HA-Mc. Thus, understanding SIM performance and characteristics requires a focus on the viscosity of SIMs. |
format |
article |
author |
Ryohei Hirose Takuma Yoshida Yuji Naito Naoto Watanabe Hikaru Hashimoto Satoshi Sugino Risa Bandou Tomo Daidoji Ken Inoue Osamu Dohi Naohisa Yoshida Takaaki Nakaya Yoshito Itoh |
author_facet |
Ryohei Hirose Takuma Yoshida Yuji Naito Naoto Watanabe Hikaru Hashimoto Satoshi Sugino Risa Bandou Tomo Daidoji Ken Inoue Osamu Dohi Naohisa Yoshida Takaaki Nakaya Yoshito Itoh |
author_sort |
Ryohei Hirose |
title |
Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis |
title_short |
Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis |
title_full |
Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis |
title_fullStr |
Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in Japan based on viscosity analysis |
title_sort |
differences between two sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection materials currently used in japan based on viscosity analysis |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d395186fb309493b8695a41d43fd622d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ryoheihirose differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT takumayoshida differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT yujinaito differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT naotowatanabe differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT hikaruhashimoto differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT satoshisugino differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT risabandou differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT tomodaidoji differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT keninoue differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT osamudohi differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT naohisayoshida differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT takaakinakaya differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis AT yoshitoitoh differencesbetweentwosodiumhyaluronatebasedsubmucosalinjectionmaterialscurrentlyusedinjapanbasedonviscosityanalysis |
_version_ |
1718385478065979392 |