Formant Tracking Using Quasi-Closed Phase Forward-Backward Linear Prediction Analysis and Deep Neural Networks

Formant tracking is investigated in this study by using trackers based on dynamic programming (DP) and deep neural nets (DNNs). Using the DP approach, six formant estimation methods were first compared. The six methods include linear prediction (LP) algorithms, weighted LP algorithms and the recentl...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhananjaya N. Gowda, Bajibabu Bollepalli, Sudarsana Reddy Kadiri, Paavo Alku
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: IEEE 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d3e5f843aaf44751a9b53d75a6163f7e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d3e5f843aaf44751a9b53d75a6163f7e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d3e5f843aaf44751a9b53d75a6163f7e2021-11-17T00:00:38ZFormant Tracking Using Quasi-Closed Phase Forward-Backward Linear Prediction Analysis and Deep Neural Networks2169-353610.1109/ACCESS.2021.3126280https://doaj.org/article/d3e5f843aaf44751a9b53d75a6163f7e2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9606741/https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536Formant tracking is investigated in this study by using trackers based on dynamic programming (DP) and deep neural nets (DNNs). Using the DP approach, six formant estimation methods were first compared. The six methods include linear prediction (LP) algorithms, weighted LP algorithms and the recently developed quasi-closed phase forward-backward (QCP-FB) method. QCP-FB gave the best performance in the comparison. Therefore, a novel formant tracking approach, which combines benefits of deep learning and signal processing based on QCP-FB, was proposed. In this approach, the formants predicted by a DNN-based tracker from a speech frame are refined using the peaks of the all-pole spectrum computed by QCP-FB from the same frame. Results show that the proposed DNN-based tracker performed better both in detection rate and estimation error for the lowest three formants compared to reference formant trackers. Compared to the popular Wavesurfer, for example, the proposed tracker gave a reduction of 29%, 48%, and 35% in the estimation error for the lowest three formants, respectively.Dhananjaya N. GowdaBajibabu BollepalliSudarsana Reddy KadiriPaavo AlkuIEEEarticleSpeech analysisformant trackinglinear predictiondynamic programmingdeep neural netElectrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringTK1-9971ENIEEE Access, Vol 9, Pp 151631-151640 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Speech analysis
formant tracking
linear prediction
dynamic programming
deep neural net
Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
TK1-9971
spellingShingle Speech analysis
formant tracking
linear prediction
dynamic programming
deep neural net
Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
TK1-9971
Dhananjaya N. Gowda
Bajibabu Bollepalli
Sudarsana Reddy Kadiri
Paavo Alku
Formant Tracking Using Quasi-Closed Phase Forward-Backward Linear Prediction Analysis and Deep Neural Networks
description Formant tracking is investigated in this study by using trackers based on dynamic programming (DP) and deep neural nets (DNNs). Using the DP approach, six formant estimation methods were first compared. The six methods include linear prediction (LP) algorithms, weighted LP algorithms and the recently developed quasi-closed phase forward-backward (QCP-FB) method. QCP-FB gave the best performance in the comparison. Therefore, a novel formant tracking approach, which combines benefits of deep learning and signal processing based on QCP-FB, was proposed. In this approach, the formants predicted by a DNN-based tracker from a speech frame are refined using the peaks of the all-pole spectrum computed by QCP-FB from the same frame. Results show that the proposed DNN-based tracker performed better both in detection rate and estimation error for the lowest three formants compared to reference formant trackers. Compared to the popular Wavesurfer, for example, the proposed tracker gave a reduction of 29%, 48%, and 35% in the estimation error for the lowest three formants, respectively.
format article
author Dhananjaya N. Gowda
Bajibabu Bollepalli
Sudarsana Reddy Kadiri
Paavo Alku
author_facet Dhananjaya N. Gowda
Bajibabu Bollepalli
Sudarsana Reddy Kadiri
Paavo Alku
author_sort Dhananjaya N. Gowda
title Formant Tracking Using Quasi-Closed Phase Forward-Backward Linear Prediction Analysis and Deep Neural Networks
title_short Formant Tracking Using Quasi-Closed Phase Forward-Backward Linear Prediction Analysis and Deep Neural Networks
title_full Formant Tracking Using Quasi-Closed Phase Forward-Backward Linear Prediction Analysis and Deep Neural Networks
title_fullStr Formant Tracking Using Quasi-Closed Phase Forward-Backward Linear Prediction Analysis and Deep Neural Networks
title_full_unstemmed Formant Tracking Using Quasi-Closed Phase Forward-Backward Linear Prediction Analysis and Deep Neural Networks
title_sort formant tracking using quasi-closed phase forward-backward linear prediction analysis and deep neural networks
publisher IEEE
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d3e5f843aaf44751a9b53d75a6163f7e
work_keys_str_mv AT dhananjayangowda formanttrackingusingquasiclosedphaseforwardbackwardlinearpredictionanalysisanddeepneuralnetworks
AT bajibabubollepalli formanttrackingusingquasiclosedphaseforwardbackwardlinearpredictionanalysisanddeepneuralnetworks
AT sudarsanareddykadiri formanttrackingusingquasiclosedphaseforwardbackwardlinearpredictionanalysisanddeepneuralnetworks
AT paavoalku formanttrackingusingquasiclosedphaseforwardbackwardlinearpredictionanalysisanddeepneuralnetworks
_version_ 1718426076760244224