Associative Political Obligations and the Distributive Objection

In this article we assess the distributive objection to the claim that we have associative political obligations. We deploy three kinds of strategy in our response: avoidance, mitigation and confrontation. Avoidance and mitigation are accommodating responses, in which we argue that associative poli...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: John Horton, Ryan Windeknecht
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
IT
Publicado: Rosenberg & Sellier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d45d61ebe80945b18b45d6cfd10861b1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d45d61ebe80945b18b45d6cfd10861b1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d45d61ebe80945b18b45d6cfd10861b12021-12-02T09:29:57ZAssociative Political Obligations and the Distributive Objection10.13128/Phe_Mi-181612280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/d45d61ebe80945b18b45d6cfd10861b12016-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7223https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 In this article we assess the distributive objection to the claim that we have associative political obligations. We deploy three kinds of strategy in our response: avoidance, mitigation and confrontation. Avoidance and mitigation are accommodating responses, in which we argue that associative political obligations often need not fall foul of the distributive objection in any very damaging way. But they may not always be enough, and thus confrontation may sometimes be necessary. This response involves rejecting the more extreme claims of proponents of the distributive objection, while accepting that occasionally serious tensions between the demands of our associative political obligations and those of global redistribution may remain, both of which have moral standing. John HortonRyan WindeknechtRosenberg & Sellierarticleassociativismdistributive objectionglobal redistributionAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 9 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
IT
topic associativism
distributive objection
global redistribution
Aesthetics
BH1-301
Ethics
BJ1-1725
spellingShingle associativism
distributive objection
global redistribution
Aesthetics
BH1-301
Ethics
BJ1-1725
John Horton
Ryan Windeknecht
Associative Political Obligations and the Distributive Objection
description In this article we assess the distributive objection to the claim that we have associative political obligations. We deploy three kinds of strategy in our response: avoidance, mitigation and confrontation. Avoidance and mitigation are accommodating responses, in which we argue that associative political obligations often need not fall foul of the distributive objection in any very damaging way. But they may not always be enough, and thus confrontation may sometimes be necessary. This response involves rejecting the more extreme claims of proponents of the distributive objection, while accepting that occasionally serious tensions between the demands of our associative political obligations and those of global redistribution may remain, both of which have moral standing.
format article
author John Horton
Ryan Windeknecht
author_facet John Horton
Ryan Windeknecht
author_sort John Horton
title Associative Political Obligations and the Distributive Objection
title_short Associative Political Obligations and the Distributive Objection
title_full Associative Political Obligations and the Distributive Objection
title_fullStr Associative Political Obligations and the Distributive Objection
title_full_unstemmed Associative Political Obligations and the Distributive Objection
title_sort associative political obligations and the distributive objection
publisher Rosenberg & Sellier
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/d45d61ebe80945b18b45d6cfd10861b1
work_keys_str_mv AT johnhorton associativepoliticalobligationsandthedistributiveobjection
AT ryanwindeknecht associativepoliticalobligationsandthedistributiveobjection
_version_ 1718398092198281216