THE FEBRUARY REVOLUTION OF 1917 AND SERBIA

The paper considers the Serbian-Russian official relations on the eve and during the February Revolution of 1917 in Russia. The study is based on numerous archival sources and on the wide range of Russian and Serbian historiography. For the best understanding of changes of Russian foreign policy on...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: A. Yu. Timofeev
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: MGIMO University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d4afc59984884bc68b217f2246e688a2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d4afc59984884bc68b217f2246e688a2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d4afc59984884bc68b217f2246e688a22021-11-23T14:50:39ZTHE FEBRUARY REVOLUTION OF 1917 AND SERBIA2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2017-3-54-16-40https://doaj.org/article/d4afc59984884bc68b217f2246e688a22017-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/699https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099The paper considers the Serbian-Russian official relations on the eve and during the February Revolution of 1917 in Russia. The study is based on numerous archival sources and on the wide range of Russian and Serbian historiography. For the best understanding of changes of Russian foreign policy on the Balkans caused by the Provisional Government’s coming to power the author investigates the Russian Empire plans of post-war reorganization of the western part of the Balkan Peninsula; the influence of other countries – allies of Russia in World War I is also analyzed. The Serbian official representatives noted the English influence on the coup in Russia though they did not provide any exact data about it. The official representatives of Serbia were not unanimous in their reactions towards the February revolution. The military took a cautious approach and noted the growth of negative phenomena, their opinions were rather conservative. Diplomats were more liberal in their assessments, they criticized the fallen dynasty more strongly and showed greater optimism than the military. At the same time all of them were unanimous in the necessity to follow the path of full neutrality and non-interference in internal affairs of Russia. The author comes to the conclusion that despite the radical changes that the February revolution made in the post-war reconstruction of the Balkan Peninsula, Serbia could not have foreseen those changes beforehand. The exceptions were only some analytical works of the officers of the Serbian General Staff.A. Yu. TimofeevMGIMO University Pressarticlethe february revolution of 1917serbian-russian relationsrussian policy in the balkansthe black sea straitsthe bosporus and the dardanellesthe first world warthe ententethe history of diplomacyInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 3(54), Pp 16-40 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic the february revolution of 1917
serbian-russian relations
russian policy in the balkans
the black sea straits
the bosporus and the dardanelles
the first world war
the entente
the history of diplomacy
International relations
JZ2-6530
spellingShingle the february revolution of 1917
serbian-russian relations
russian policy in the balkans
the black sea straits
the bosporus and the dardanelles
the first world war
the entente
the history of diplomacy
International relations
JZ2-6530
A. Yu. Timofeev
THE FEBRUARY REVOLUTION OF 1917 AND SERBIA
description The paper considers the Serbian-Russian official relations on the eve and during the February Revolution of 1917 in Russia. The study is based on numerous archival sources and on the wide range of Russian and Serbian historiography. For the best understanding of changes of Russian foreign policy on the Balkans caused by the Provisional Government’s coming to power the author investigates the Russian Empire plans of post-war reorganization of the western part of the Balkan Peninsula; the influence of other countries – allies of Russia in World War I is also analyzed. The Serbian official representatives noted the English influence on the coup in Russia though they did not provide any exact data about it. The official representatives of Serbia were not unanimous in their reactions towards the February revolution. The military took a cautious approach and noted the growth of negative phenomena, their opinions were rather conservative. Diplomats were more liberal in their assessments, they criticized the fallen dynasty more strongly and showed greater optimism than the military. At the same time all of them were unanimous in the necessity to follow the path of full neutrality and non-interference in internal affairs of Russia. The author comes to the conclusion that despite the radical changes that the February revolution made in the post-war reconstruction of the Balkan Peninsula, Serbia could not have foreseen those changes beforehand. The exceptions were only some analytical works of the officers of the Serbian General Staff.
format article
author A. Yu. Timofeev
author_facet A. Yu. Timofeev
author_sort A. Yu. Timofeev
title THE FEBRUARY REVOLUTION OF 1917 AND SERBIA
title_short THE FEBRUARY REVOLUTION OF 1917 AND SERBIA
title_full THE FEBRUARY REVOLUTION OF 1917 AND SERBIA
title_fullStr THE FEBRUARY REVOLUTION OF 1917 AND SERBIA
title_full_unstemmed THE FEBRUARY REVOLUTION OF 1917 AND SERBIA
title_sort february revolution of 1917 and serbia
publisher MGIMO University Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/d4afc59984884bc68b217f2246e688a2
work_keys_str_mv AT ayutimofeev thefebruaryrevolutionof1917andserbia
AT ayutimofeev februaryrevolutionof1917andserbia
_version_ 1718416677449760768