UNILATERAL PROPTOSIS - A DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA

Objective: To study epidemiology, presentation and management of cases with unilateral proptosis presenting at a tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Case series. Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jan 2016 to Dec 2017. Methodolo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ubaid Ullah Yasin, Muhammad Amer Yaqub, Syed Abid Hassan Naqvi, Muhammad Shahid, Asad Habib, Muhammad Awais
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Army Medical College Rawalpindi 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d4bc37ba2d13463fbffd57fe2ed62596
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d4bc37ba2d13463fbffd57fe2ed62596
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d4bc37ba2d13463fbffd57fe2ed625962021-11-23T03:39:13ZUNILATERAL PROPTOSIS - A DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA0030-96482411-8842https://doaj.org/article/d4bc37ba2d13463fbffd57fe2ed625962021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/3593/3615https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842Objective: To study epidemiology, presentation and management of cases with unilateral proptosis presenting at a tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Case series. Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jan 2016 to Dec 2017. Methodology: Retrospective analysis of hospital record of patients with unilateral proptosis was carried out. Data was entered and analyzed in SPSS version 22. Chi square test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Thirty-three cases of unilateral proptosis with a mean age of 41.79 ± 3.87 years were included in the study. Pain was the most common association. Proptosis was mild in 42.4%, moderate in 48.5% and severe in 9.1% cases. In 61% cases, diagnosis was made on excisional or incisional biopsy and on the basis of radio imaging in 39% cases. Most common cause of proptosis found was pleomorphic adenoma (12%). Patients with axial and non-axial proptosis were 48.5% and 51.5% respectively. Fourteen cases (42.5%) were managed surgically and 2 cases (6%) were observed. Total of 22 cases (67%) improved after treatment, 8 cases (24%) went into remission, 2 (6%) deteriorated, and 1 (3%) died in the study period. Conclusion: Unilateral proptosis is a diagnostic challenge. Pertinent history taking and detail examination is the key, but associated signs or symptoms not always point towards correct diagnosis. Tissue biopsy provides a conclusive diagnosis especially where radio imaging is doubtful.Ubaid Ullah YasinMuhammad Amer YaqubSyed Abid Hassan NaqviMuhammad ShahidAsad HabibMuhammad AwaisArmy Medical College Rawalpindiarticleexophthalmoshertelproptosispleomorphic adenomathyroid eye diseaseMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENPakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, Vol 71, Iss 5, Pp 1755-1758 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic exophthalmos
hertel
proptosis
pleomorphic adenoma
thyroid eye disease
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle exophthalmos
hertel
proptosis
pleomorphic adenoma
thyroid eye disease
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Ubaid Ullah Yasin
Muhammad Amer Yaqub
Syed Abid Hassan Naqvi
Muhammad Shahid
Asad Habib
Muhammad Awais
UNILATERAL PROPTOSIS - A DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA
description Objective: To study epidemiology, presentation and management of cases with unilateral proptosis presenting at a tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Case series. Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jan 2016 to Dec 2017. Methodology: Retrospective analysis of hospital record of patients with unilateral proptosis was carried out. Data was entered and analyzed in SPSS version 22. Chi square test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Thirty-three cases of unilateral proptosis with a mean age of 41.79 ± 3.87 years were included in the study. Pain was the most common association. Proptosis was mild in 42.4%, moderate in 48.5% and severe in 9.1% cases. In 61% cases, diagnosis was made on excisional or incisional biopsy and on the basis of radio imaging in 39% cases. Most common cause of proptosis found was pleomorphic adenoma (12%). Patients with axial and non-axial proptosis were 48.5% and 51.5% respectively. Fourteen cases (42.5%) were managed surgically and 2 cases (6%) were observed. Total of 22 cases (67%) improved after treatment, 8 cases (24%) went into remission, 2 (6%) deteriorated, and 1 (3%) died in the study period. Conclusion: Unilateral proptosis is a diagnostic challenge. Pertinent history taking and detail examination is the key, but associated signs or symptoms not always point towards correct diagnosis. Tissue biopsy provides a conclusive diagnosis especially where radio imaging is doubtful.
format article
author Ubaid Ullah Yasin
Muhammad Amer Yaqub
Syed Abid Hassan Naqvi
Muhammad Shahid
Asad Habib
Muhammad Awais
author_facet Ubaid Ullah Yasin
Muhammad Amer Yaqub
Syed Abid Hassan Naqvi
Muhammad Shahid
Asad Habib
Muhammad Awais
author_sort Ubaid Ullah Yasin
title UNILATERAL PROPTOSIS - A DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA
title_short UNILATERAL PROPTOSIS - A DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA
title_full UNILATERAL PROPTOSIS - A DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA
title_fullStr UNILATERAL PROPTOSIS - A DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA
title_full_unstemmed UNILATERAL PROPTOSIS - A DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA
title_sort unilateral proptosis - a diagnostic dilemma
publisher Army Medical College Rawalpindi
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d4bc37ba2d13463fbffd57fe2ed62596
work_keys_str_mv AT ubaidullahyasin unilateralproptosisadiagnosticdilemma
AT muhammadameryaqub unilateralproptosisadiagnosticdilemma
AT syedabidhassannaqvi unilateralproptosisadiagnosticdilemma
AT muhammadshahid unilateralproptosisadiagnosticdilemma
AT asadhabib unilateralproptosisadiagnosticdilemma
AT muhammadawais unilateralproptosisadiagnosticdilemma
_version_ 1718417349512527872