Modernité, anachronisme et ambivalence des risques et catastrophes naturelles à travers l’approche géohistorique

Historical data allows to raise the problem of natural hazard consideration in territorial management in an original way. The cultural and historical context of the production of old documents about natural disasters must be interpreted to clarify the qualitative evolutions of what is not yet called...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Nancy Meschinet De Richemond
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	FR
Publicado:	Éditions en environnement VertigO 2016
Materias:	natural hazard disaster Mediterranean flood historical vulnerability compensation perception Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d4cdbf1a043e42d4a5f372d4b4606f91
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d4cdbf1a043e42d4a5f372d4b4606f91
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d4cdbf1a043e42d4a5f372d4b4606f912021-12-02T09:59:19ZModernité, anachronisme et ambivalence des risques et catastrophes naturelles à travers l’approche géohistorique1492-844210.4000/vertigo.18034https://doaj.org/article/d4cdbf1a043e42d4a5f372d4b4606f912016-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/18034https://doaj.org/toc/1492-8442Historical data allows to raise the problem of natural hazard consideration in territorial management in an original way. The cultural and historical context of the production of old documents about natural disasters must be interpreted to clarify the qualitative evolutions of what is not yet called the vulnerability. Reduce the historical diversity of disaster victims aids procedures to a « compensation » may be educational but illustrates an « épistémisation » process (Chouquer, 2008) : aids procedures can easily be reduced to its financial side, as it is usually the most important today. But it was not the same during the XVIIIth century in France. The historical overwhelmingly implicit context, within which these aids are organized must be specified and constructed. The geohistorical approach of risk is not only interesting in itself to detect stereotypes and anachronisms, but also allows to re-question the contemporary practices of hazard management. To make allowance for the diversity of facts and representations allows then to wonder about the positive and creative side of hazard and disaster. This ambivalence of risk and disaster is often claimed by the victims as the creator of social cohesion through an empirical and global management. While wanting to restore a positive side of the vulnerabilities, the resilience notion may prevent the integration of this creative side by contributing to strengthen the modern framework thinking established on division and high specialization ?Nancy Meschinet De RichemondÉditions en environnement VertigOarticlenatural hazarddisasterMediterranean floodhistorical vulnerabilitycompensationperceptionEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350FRVertigO, Vol 16, Iss 3 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	FR
topic	natural hazard disaster Mediterranean flood historical vulnerability compensation perception Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	natural hazard disaster Mediterranean flood historical vulnerability compensation perception Environmental sciences GE1-350 Nancy Meschinet De Richemond Modernité, anachronisme et ambivalence des risques et catastrophes naturelles à travers l’approche géohistorique
description	Historical data allows to raise the problem of natural hazard consideration in territorial management in an original way. The cultural and historical context of the production of old documents about natural disasters must be interpreted to clarify the qualitative evolutions of what is not yet called the vulnerability. Reduce the historical diversity of disaster victims aids procedures to a « compensation » may be educational but illustrates an « épistémisation » process (Chouquer, 2008) : aids procedures can easily be reduced to its financial side, as it is usually the most important today. But it was not the same during the XVIIIth century in France. The historical overwhelmingly implicit context, within which these aids are organized must be specified and constructed. The geohistorical approach of risk is not only interesting in itself to detect stereotypes and anachronisms, but also allows to re-question the contemporary practices of hazard management. To make allowance for the diversity of facts and representations allows then to wonder about the positive and creative side of hazard and disaster. This ambivalence of risk and disaster is often claimed by the victims as the creator of social cohesion through an empirical and global management. While wanting to restore a positive side of the vulnerabilities, the resilience notion may prevent the integration of this creative side by contributing to strengthen the modern framework thinking established on division and high specialization ?
format	article
author	Nancy Meschinet De Richemond
author_facet	Nancy Meschinet De Richemond
author_sort	Nancy Meschinet De Richemond
title	Modernité, anachronisme et ambivalence des risques et catastrophes naturelles à travers l’approche géohistorique
title_short	Modernité, anachronisme et ambivalence des risques et catastrophes naturelles à travers l’approche géohistorique
title_full	Modernité, anachronisme et ambivalence des risques et catastrophes naturelles à travers l’approche géohistorique
title_fullStr	Modernité, anachronisme et ambivalence des risques et catastrophes naturelles à travers l’approche géohistorique
title_full_unstemmed	Modernité, anachronisme et ambivalence des risques et catastrophes naturelles à travers l’approche géohistorique
title_sort	modernité, anachronisme et ambivalence des risques et catastrophes naturelles à travers l’approche géohistorique
publisher	Éditions en environnement VertigO
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/d4cdbf1a043e42d4a5f372d4b4606f91
work_keys_str_mv	AT nancymeschinetderichemond moderniteanachronismeetambivalencedesrisquesetcatastrophesnaturellesatraverslapprochegeohistorique
_version_	1718397837871415296

Modernité, anachronisme et ambivalence des risques et catastrophes naturelles à travers l’approche géohistorique

Ejemplares similares