Resonance frequency is not always stable over time and could be related to the inter-beat interval

Abstract Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) is based on breathing at an optimal rate (or resonance frequency, RF) corresponding to the respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). Our aim is to check whether the RF is a stable factor and analyse the HRV parameters individually per each breathing rate,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Lluis Capdevila, Eva Parrado, Juan Ramos-Castro, Rafael Zapata-Lamana, Jaume F. Lalanza
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d4d9fe6955a64fa6b1d00efce902f999
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d4d9fe6955a64fa6b1d00efce902f999
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d4d9fe6955a64fa6b1d00efce902f9992021-12-02T18:03:31ZResonance frequency is not always stable over time and could be related to the inter-beat interval10.1038/s41598-021-87867-82045-2322https://doaj.org/article/d4d9fe6955a64fa6b1d00efce902f9992021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87867-8https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) is based on breathing at an optimal rate (or resonance frequency, RF) corresponding to the respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). Our aim is to check whether the RF is a stable factor and analyse the HRV parameters individually per each breathing rate, comparing it with free slow breathing. A sample of 21 participants were trained in a test–retest HRVB protocol. The results indicated that RF changed between Test and Retest sessions in 66.7% of participants. This instability could be related to the average of interbeat interval (IBI). HRV time domain parameters (SDNN and RMSSD) were significantly higher for RF than for other breathing rates, including 6 breath/min and free slow breathing. Free slow breathing showed a lower heart rate averages than RF and other slow breathing rates. Overall, our study suggests the relevance of assessing RF individually and before each HRVB session, because the maximum cardiovascular benefits in terms of increasing HRV were found only at RF. Thus, breathing at the individualized and momentary frequency of resonance increases cardiac variability.Lluis CapdevilaEva ParradoJuan Ramos-CastroRafael Zapata-LamanaJaume F. LalanzaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Lluis Capdevila Eva Parrado Juan Ramos-Castro Rafael Zapata-Lamana Jaume F. Lalanza Resonance frequency is not always stable over time and could be related to the inter-beat interval
description	Abstract Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) is based on breathing at an optimal rate (or resonance frequency, RF) corresponding to the respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). Our aim is to check whether the RF is a stable factor and analyse the HRV parameters individually per each breathing rate, comparing it with free slow breathing. A sample of 21 participants were trained in a test–retest HRVB protocol. The results indicated that RF changed between Test and Retest sessions in 66.7% of participants. This instability could be related to the average of interbeat interval (IBI). HRV time domain parameters (SDNN and RMSSD) were significantly higher for RF than for other breathing rates, including 6 breath/min and free slow breathing. Free slow breathing showed a lower heart rate averages than RF and other slow breathing rates. Overall, our study suggests the relevance of assessing RF individually and before each HRVB session, because the maximum cardiovascular benefits in terms of increasing HRV were found only at RF. Thus, breathing at the individualized and momentary frequency of resonance increases cardiac variability.
format	article
author	Lluis Capdevila Eva Parrado Juan Ramos-Castro Rafael Zapata-Lamana Jaume F. Lalanza
author_facet	Lluis Capdevila Eva Parrado Juan Ramos-Castro Rafael Zapata-Lamana Jaume F. Lalanza
author_sort	Lluis Capdevila
title	Resonance frequency is not always stable over time and could be related to the inter-beat interval
title_short	Resonance frequency is not always stable over time and could be related to the inter-beat interval
title_full	Resonance frequency is not always stable over time and could be related to the inter-beat interval
title_fullStr	Resonance frequency is not always stable over time and could be related to the inter-beat interval
title_full_unstemmed	Resonance frequency is not always stable over time and could be related to the inter-beat interval
title_sort	resonance frequency is not always stable over time and could be related to the inter-beat interval
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/d4d9fe6955a64fa6b1d00efce902f999
work_keys_str_mv	AT lluiscapdevila resonancefrequencyisnotalwaysstableovertimeandcouldberelatedtotheinterbeatinterval AT evaparrado resonancefrequencyisnotalwaysstableovertimeandcouldberelatedtotheinterbeatinterval AT juanramoscastro resonancefrequencyisnotalwaysstableovertimeandcouldberelatedtotheinterbeatinterval AT rafaelzapatalamana resonancefrequencyisnotalwaysstableovertimeandcouldberelatedtotheinterbeatinterval AT jaumeflalanza resonancefrequencyisnotalwaysstableovertimeandcouldberelatedtotheinterbeatinterval
_version_	1718378715407187968

Resonance frequency is not always stable over time and could be related to the inter-beat interval

Ejemplares similares