Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal
Background: Structured reporting (SR) in radiology has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR)-based reports in pancreatic adenocarcinoma during the staging phase in order to improve communicatio...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d5a1bb098ca243b6874e7b1493d5bfc4 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d5a1bb098ca243b6874e7b1493d5bfc4 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d5a1bb098ca243b6874e7b1493d5bfc42021-11-25T17:21:01ZStructured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal10.3390/diagnostics111120332075-4418https://doaj.org/article/d5a1bb098ca243b6874e7b1493d5bfc42021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/11/2033https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4418Background: Structured reporting (SR) in radiology has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR)-based reports in pancreatic adenocarcinoma during the staging phase in order to improve communication between the radiologist and members of multidisciplinary teams. Materials and Methods: A panel of expert radiologists, members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. A modified Delphi process was used to develop the CT-SR and MRI-SR, assessing a level of agreement for all report sections. Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency for each section and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. Results: The final CT-SR version was built by including n = 16 items in the “Patient Clinical Data” section, n = 11 items in the “Clinical Evaluation” section, n = 7 items in the “Imaging Protocol” section, and n = 18 items in the “Report” section. Overall, 52 items were included in the final version of the CT-SR. The final MRI-SR version was built by including n = 16 items in the “Patient Clinical Data” section, n = 11 items in the “Clinical Evaluation” section, n = 8 items in the “Imaging Protocol” section, and n = 14 items in the “Report” section. Overall, 49 items were included in the final version of the MRI-SR. In the first round for CT-SR, all sections received more than a good rating. The overall mean score of the experts was 4.85. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.85. In the second round, the overall mean score of the experts was 4.87, and the Cα correlation coefficient was 0.94. In the first round, for MRI-SR, all sections received more than a good rating. The overall mean score of the experts was 4.73. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.82. In the second round, the overall mean score of the experts was 4.91, and the Cα correlation coefficient was 0.93. Conclusions: The CT-SR and MRI-SR are based on a multi-round consensus-building Delphi exercise derived from the multidisciplinary agreement of expert radiologists in order to obtain more appropriate communication tools for referring physicians.Vincenza GranataGiovanni MoranaMirko D'OnofrioRoberta FuscoFrancesca CoppolaFrancesca GrassiSalvatore CappabiancaAlfonso ReginelliNicola MaggialettiDuccio BuccicardiAntonio BarileMarco RengoChandra BortolottoFabrizio UrraroGiorgia Viola La CasellaMarco MontellaEleonora CiaghiFrancesco BellifemineFederica De MuzioGinevra DantiGiulia GrazziniCarmelo BarresiLuca BruneseEmanuele NeriRoberto GrassiVittorio MieleLorenzo FaggioniMDPI AGarticleradiology reportstructured reportpancreatic adenocarcinomacomputed tomographymagnetic resonance imagingMedicine (General)R5-920ENDiagnostics, Vol 11, Iss 2033, p 2033 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
radiology report structured report pancreatic adenocarcinoma computed tomography magnetic resonance imaging Medicine (General) R5-920 |
| spellingShingle |
radiology report structured report pancreatic adenocarcinoma computed tomography magnetic resonance imaging Medicine (General) R5-920 Vincenza Granata Giovanni Morana Mirko D'Onofrio Roberta Fusco Francesca Coppola Francesca Grassi Salvatore Cappabianca Alfonso Reginelli Nicola Maggialetti Duccio Buccicardi Antonio Barile Marco Rengo Chandra Bortolotto Fabrizio Urraro Giorgia Viola La Casella Marco Montella Eleonora Ciaghi Francesco Bellifemine Federica De Muzio Ginevra Danti Giulia Grazzini Carmelo Barresi Luca Brunese Emanuele Neri Roberto Grassi Vittorio Miele Lorenzo Faggioni Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
| description |
Background: Structured reporting (SR) in radiology has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR)-based reports in pancreatic adenocarcinoma during the staging phase in order to improve communication between the radiologist and members of multidisciplinary teams. Materials and Methods: A panel of expert radiologists, members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. A modified Delphi process was used to develop the CT-SR and MRI-SR, assessing a level of agreement for all report sections. Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency for each section and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. Results: The final CT-SR version was built by including n = 16 items in the “Patient Clinical Data” section, n = 11 items in the “Clinical Evaluation” section, n = 7 items in the “Imaging Protocol” section, and n = 18 items in the “Report” section. Overall, 52 items were included in the final version of the CT-SR. The final MRI-SR version was built by including n = 16 items in the “Patient Clinical Data” section, n = 11 items in the “Clinical Evaluation” section, n = 8 items in the “Imaging Protocol” section, and n = 14 items in the “Report” section. Overall, 49 items were included in the final version of the MRI-SR. In the first round for CT-SR, all sections received more than a good rating. The overall mean score of the experts was 4.85. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.85. In the second round, the overall mean score of the experts was 4.87, and the Cα correlation coefficient was 0.94. In the first round, for MRI-SR, all sections received more than a good rating. The overall mean score of the experts was 4.73. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.82. In the second round, the overall mean score of the experts was 4.91, and the Cα correlation coefficient was 0.93. Conclusions: The CT-SR and MRI-SR are based on a multi-round consensus-building Delphi exercise derived from the multidisciplinary agreement of expert radiologists in order to obtain more appropriate communication tools for referring physicians. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Vincenza Granata Giovanni Morana Mirko D'Onofrio Roberta Fusco Francesca Coppola Francesca Grassi Salvatore Cappabianca Alfonso Reginelli Nicola Maggialetti Duccio Buccicardi Antonio Barile Marco Rengo Chandra Bortolotto Fabrizio Urraro Giorgia Viola La Casella Marco Montella Eleonora Ciaghi Francesco Bellifemine Federica De Muzio Ginevra Danti Giulia Grazzini Carmelo Barresi Luca Brunese Emanuele Neri Roberto Grassi Vittorio Miele Lorenzo Faggioni |
| author_facet |
Vincenza Granata Giovanni Morana Mirko D'Onofrio Roberta Fusco Francesca Coppola Francesca Grassi Salvatore Cappabianca Alfonso Reginelli Nicola Maggialetti Duccio Buccicardi Antonio Barile Marco Rengo Chandra Bortolotto Fabrizio Urraro Giorgia Viola La Casella Marco Montella Eleonora Ciaghi Francesco Bellifemine Federica De Muzio Ginevra Danti Giulia Grazzini Carmelo Barresi Luca Brunese Emanuele Neri Roberto Grassi Vittorio Miele Lorenzo Faggioni |
| author_sort |
Vincenza Granata |
| title |
Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
| title_short |
Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
| title_full |
Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
| title_fullStr |
Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
| title_sort |
structured reporting of computed tomography and magnetic resonance in the staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a delphi consensus proposal |
| publisher |
MDPI AG |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/d5a1bb098ca243b6874e7b1493d5bfc4 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT vincenzagranata structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT giovannimorana structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT mirkodonofrio structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT robertafusco structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT francescacoppola structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT francescagrassi structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT salvatorecappabianca structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT alfonsoreginelli structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT nicolamaggialetti structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT ducciobuccicardi structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT antoniobarile structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT marcorengo structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT chandrabortolotto structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT fabriziourraro structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT giorgiaviolalacasella structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT marcomontella structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT eleonoraciaghi structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT francescobellifemine structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT federicademuzio structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT ginevradanti structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT giuliagrazzini structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT carmelobarresi structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT lucabrunese structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT emanueleneri structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT robertograssi structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT vittoriomiele structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal AT lorenzofaggioni structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal |
| _version_ |
1718412498109988864 |