Prostate cancer-derived holoclones: a novel and effective model for evaluating cancer stemness

Abstract Prostate cancer accounts for approximately 13.5% of all newly diagnosed male cancer cases. Significant clinical burdens remain in terms of ineffective prognostication, with overtreatment of insignificant disease. Additionally, the pathobiology underlying disease heterogeneity remains poorly...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Louise Flynn, Martin P. Barr, Anne-Marie Baird, Paul Smyth, Orla M. Casey, Gordon Blackshields, John Greene, Stephen R. Pennington, Emily Hams, Padraic G. Fallon, John O’Leary, Orla Sheils, Stephen P. Finn
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d612e913180e4043beedde23937a643d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d612e913180e4043beedde23937a643d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d612e913180e4043beedde23937a643d2021-12-02T15:39:49ZProstate cancer-derived holoclones: a novel and effective model for evaluating cancer stemness10.1038/s41598-020-68187-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/d612e913180e4043beedde23937a643d2020-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68187-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Prostate cancer accounts for approximately 13.5% of all newly diagnosed male cancer cases. Significant clinical burdens remain in terms of ineffective prognostication, with overtreatment of insignificant disease. Additionally, the pathobiology underlying disease heterogeneity remains poorly understood. As the role of cancer stem cells in the perpetuation of aggressive carcinoma is being substantiated by experimental evidence, it is crucially important to understand the molecular mechanisms, which regulate key features of cancer stem cells. We investigated two methods for in vitro cultivation of putative prostate cancer stem cells based on ‘high-salt agar’ and ‘monoclonal cultivation’. Data demonstrated ‘monoclonal cultivation’ as the superior method. We demonstrated that ‘holoclones’ expressed canonical stem markers, retained the exclusive ability to generate poorly differentiated tumours in NOD/SCID mice and possessed a unique mRNA-miRNA gene signature. miRNA:Target interactions analysis visualised potentially critical regulatory networks, which are dysregulated in prostate cancer holoclones. The characterisation of this tumorigenic population lays the groundwork for this model to be used in the identification of proteomic or small non-coding RNA therapeutic targets for the eradication of this critical cellular population. This is significant, as it provides a potential route to limit development of aggressive disease and thus improve survival rates.Louise FlynnMartin P. BarrAnne-Marie BairdPaul SmythOrla M. CaseyGordon BlackshieldsJohn GreeneStephen R. PenningtonEmily HamsPadraic G. FallonJohn O’LearyOrla SheilsStephen P. FinnNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Louise Flynn
Martin P. Barr
Anne-Marie Baird
Paul Smyth
Orla M. Casey
Gordon Blackshields
John Greene
Stephen R. Pennington
Emily Hams
Padraic G. Fallon
John O’Leary
Orla Sheils
Stephen P. Finn
Prostate cancer-derived holoclones: a novel and effective model for evaluating cancer stemness
description Abstract Prostate cancer accounts for approximately 13.5% of all newly diagnosed male cancer cases. Significant clinical burdens remain in terms of ineffective prognostication, with overtreatment of insignificant disease. Additionally, the pathobiology underlying disease heterogeneity remains poorly understood. As the role of cancer stem cells in the perpetuation of aggressive carcinoma is being substantiated by experimental evidence, it is crucially important to understand the molecular mechanisms, which regulate key features of cancer stem cells. We investigated two methods for in vitro cultivation of putative prostate cancer stem cells based on ‘high-salt agar’ and ‘monoclonal cultivation’. Data demonstrated ‘monoclonal cultivation’ as the superior method. We demonstrated that ‘holoclones’ expressed canonical stem markers, retained the exclusive ability to generate poorly differentiated tumours in NOD/SCID mice and possessed a unique mRNA-miRNA gene signature. miRNA:Target interactions analysis visualised potentially critical regulatory networks, which are dysregulated in prostate cancer holoclones. The characterisation of this tumorigenic population lays the groundwork for this model to be used in the identification of proteomic or small non-coding RNA therapeutic targets for the eradication of this critical cellular population. This is significant, as it provides a potential route to limit development of aggressive disease and thus improve survival rates.
format article
author Louise Flynn
Martin P. Barr
Anne-Marie Baird
Paul Smyth
Orla M. Casey
Gordon Blackshields
John Greene
Stephen R. Pennington
Emily Hams
Padraic G. Fallon
John O’Leary
Orla Sheils
Stephen P. Finn
author_facet Louise Flynn
Martin P. Barr
Anne-Marie Baird
Paul Smyth
Orla M. Casey
Gordon Blackshields
John Greene
Stephen R. Pennington
Emily Hams
Padraic G. Fallon
John O’Leary
Orla Sheils
Stephen P. Finn
author_sort Louise Flynn
title Prostate cancer-derived holoclones: a novel and effective model for evaluating cancer stemness
title_short Prostate cancer-derived holoclones: a novel and effective model for evaluating cancer stemness
title_full Prostate cancer-derived holoclones: a novel and effective model for evaluating cancer stemness
title_fullStr Prostate cancer-derived holoclones: a novel and effective model for evaluating cancer stemness
title_full_unstemmed Prostate cancer-derived holoclones: a novel and effective model for evaluating cancer stemness
title_sort prostate cancer-derived holoclones: a novel and effective model for evaluating cancer stemness
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/d612e913180e4043beedde23937a643d
work_keys_str_mv AT louiseflynn prostatecancerderivedholoclonesanovelandeffectivemodelforevaluatingcancerstemness
AT martinpbarr prostatecancerderivedholoclonesanovelandeffectivemodelforevaluatingcancerstemness
AT annemariebaird prostatecancerderivedholoclonesanovelandeffectivemodelforevaluatingcancerstemness
AT paulsmyth prostatecancerderivedholoclonesanovelandeffectivemodelforevaluatingcancerstemness
AT orlamcasey prostatecancerderivedholoclonesanovelandeffectivemodelforevaluatingcancerstemness
AT gordonblackshields prostatecancerderivedholoclonesanovelandeffectivemodelforevaluatingcancerstemness
AT johngreene prostatecancerderivedholoclonesanovelandeffectivemodelforevaluatingcancerstemness
AT stephenrpennington prostatecancerderivedholoclonesanovelandeffectivemodelforevaluatingcancerstemness
AT emilyhams prostatecancerderivedholoclonesanovelandeffectivemodelforevaluatingcancerstemness
AT padraicgfallon prostatecancerderivedholoclonesanovelandeffectivemodelforevaluatingcancerstemness
AT johnoleary prostatecancerderivedholoclonesanovelandeffectivemodelforevaluatingcancerstemness
AT orlasheils prostatecancerderivedholoclonesanovelandeffectivemodelforevaluatingcancerstemness
AT stephenpfinn prostatecancerderivedholoclonesanovelandeffectivemodelforevaluatingcancerstemness
_version_ 1718385902548418560