Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length

Abstract The accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is suboptimal for long or short eyes, which results in a low visual quality after multifocal IOL implantation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of IOL formulas (Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ayoung Choi, Hyunggoo Kwon, Sohee Jeon
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d69f199ed4c146ef9ebc5cddb9873550
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d69f199ed4c146ef9ebc5cddb9873550
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d69f199ed4c146ef9ebc5cddb98735502021-12-02T14:25:22ZAccuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length10.1038/s41598-021-86604-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/d69f199ed4c146ef9ebc5cddb98735502021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86604-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is suboptimal for long or short eyes, which results in a low visual quality after multifocal IOL implantation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of IOL formulas (Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haigis) for the Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States) implantation based on the axial length (AXL) from a large cohort of 2018 cases and identify the factors that are associated with a high mean absolute error (MAE). The Barrett Universal II showed the lowest MAE in the normal AXL group (0.30 ± 0.23), whereas the Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q showed the lowest MAE in the short AXL group (0.32 ± 0.22 D and 0.32 ± 0.21 D, respectively). The Haigis showed the lowest MAE in the long AXL group (0.24 ± 0.19 D). The Barrett Universal II did not perform well in short AXL eyes with higher astigmatism (P = 0.013), wider white-to-white (WTW; P < 0.001), and shorter AXL (P = 0.016). Study results suggest that the Barrett Universal II performed best for the TFNT IOL in the overall study population, except for the eyes with short AXL, particularly when the eyes had higher astigmatism, wider WTW, and shorter AXL.Ayoung ChoiHyunggoo KwonSohee JeonNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Ayoung Choi Hyunggoo Kwon Sohee Jeon Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
description	Abstract The accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is suboptimal for long or short eyes, which results in a low visual quality after multifocal IOL implantation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of IOL formulas (Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haigis) for the Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States) implantation based on the axial length (AXL) from a large cohort of 2018 cases and identify the factors that are associated with a high mean absolute error (MAE). The Barrett Universal II showed the lowest MAE in the normal AXL group (0.30 ± 0.23), whereas the Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q showed the lowest MAE in the short AXL group (0.32 ± 0.22 D and 0.32 ± 0.21 D, respectively). The Haigis showed the lowest MAE in the long AXL group (0.24 ± 0.19 D). The Barrett Universal II did not perform well in short AXL eyes with higher astigmatism (P = 0.013), wider white-to-white (WTW; P < 0.001), and shorter AXL (P = 0.016). Study results suggest that the Barrett Universal II performed best for the TFNT IOL in the overall study population, except for the eyes with short AXL, particularly when the eyes had higher astigmatism, wider WTW, and shorter AXL.
format	article
author	Ayoung Choi Hyunggoo Kwon Sohee Jeon
author_facet	Ayoung Choi Hyunggoo Kwon Sohee Jeon
author_sort	Ayoung Choi
title	Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
title_short	Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
title_full	Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
title_fullStr	Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
title_full_unstemmed	Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
title_sort	accuracy of theoretical iol formulas for panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/d69f199ed4c146ef9ebc5cddb9873550
work_keys_str_mv	AT ayoungchoi accuracyoftheoreticaliolformulasforpanoptixintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallength AT hyunggookwon accuracyoftheoreticaliolformulasforpanoptixintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallength AT soheejeon accuracyoftheoreticaliolformulasforpanoptixintraocularlensaccordingtoaxiallength
_version_	1718391399089438720

Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length

Ejemplares similares