Envisioning a Successful Steady-State Economy

There are two interacting types of argument for a steady-state economy: its biopyhsical necessity, and its ethical desirability. The first argument is made in terms of the finitude, entropy, and physical maintenance requirements of “dissipative structures” (populations of human bodies and their exo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Herman Daly
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	The White Horse Press 2018
Materias:	Environmental sciences GE1-350 Demography. Population. Vital events HB848-3697
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d6e84aca531d4cdfabd3be5f8e32ff5b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d6e84aca531d4cdfabd3be5f8e32ff5b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d6e84aca531d4cdfabd3be5f8e32ff5b2021-12-02T19:03:14ZEnvisioning a Successful Steady-State Economy10.3197/jps.2018.3.1.212398-54882398-5496https://doaj.org/article/d6e84aca531d4cdfabd3be5f8e32ff5b2018-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.whp-journals.co.uk/JPS/article/view/630https://doaj.org/toc/2398-5488https://doaj.org/toc/2398-5496 There are two interacting types of argument for a steady-state economy: its biopyhsical necessity, and its ethical desirability. The first argument is made in terms of the finitude, entropy, and physical maintenance requirements of “dissipative structures” (populations of human bodies and their exosomatic extensions). The second argument considers that the evolution of the human species is now purpose-driven, no longer random, if indeed it ever was. Purpose introduces value judgments of right and wrong regarding how our economy should relate to the rest of creation – judgments ignored by both neoclassical economics and neo-Darwinist naturalism. Herman DalyThe White Horse PressarticleEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350Demography. Population. Vital eventsHB848-3697ENThe Journal of Population and Sustainability, Vol 3, Iss 1 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Environmental sciences GE1-350 Demography. Population. Vital events HB848-3697
spellingShingle	Environmental sciences GE1-350 Demography. Population. Vital events HB848-3697 Herman Daly Envisioning a Successful Steady-State Economy
description	There are two interacting types of argument for a steady-state economy: its biopyhsical necessity, and its ethical desirability. The first argument is made in terms of the finitude, entropy, and physical maintenance requirements of “dissipative structures” (populations of human bodies and their exosomatic extensions). The second argument considers that the evolution of the human species is now purpose-driven, no longer random, if indeed it ever was. Purpose introduces value judgments of right and wrong regarding how our economy should relate to the rest of creation – judgments ignored by both neoclassical economics and neo-Darwinist naturalism.
format	article
author	Herman Daly
author_facet	Herman Daly
author_sort	Herman Daly
title	Envisioning a Successful Steady-State Economy
title_short	Envisioning a Successful Steady-State Economy
title_full	Envisioning a Successful Steady-State Economy
title_fullStr	Envisioning a Successful Steady-State Economy
title_full_unstemmed	Envisioning a Successful Steady-State Economy
title_sort	envisioning a successful steady-state economy
publisher	The White Horse Press
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/d6e84aca531d4cdfabd3be5f8e32ff5b
work_keys_str_mv	AT hermandaly envisioningasuccessfulsteadystateeconomy
_version_	1718377239214555136

Envisioning a Successful Steady-State Economy

Ejemplares similares