Too many rights: too many people without rights—two opposite case studies of claiming spaces and rights in Turin and Geneva

Abstract Introduction The multiple forms of living in the contemporary city clearly demonstrate how the relationship between living space and rights reveals itself in many ways, even to the point of being divergent and contradictory. Case description In order to analyze this point, we decided to obs...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cristina Bianchetti, Ianira Vassallo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SpringerOpen 2021
Materias:
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d725edad37764ef2b263f25c5cec999d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d725edad37764ef2b263f25c5cec999d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d725edad37764ef2b263f25c5cec999d2021-12-05T12:19:51ZToo many rights: too many people without rights—two opposite case studies of claiming spaces and rights in Turin and Geneva10.1186/s40410-021-00143-02195-2701https://doaj.org/article/d725edad37764ef2b263f25c5cec999d2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-021-00143-0https://doaj.org/toc/2195-2701Abstract Introduction The multiple forms of living in the contemporary city clearly demonstrate how the relationship between living space and rights reveals itself in many ways, even to the point of being divergent and contradictory. Case description In order to analyze this point, we decided to observe two case studies that are emblematic for the divergence of issues that they are able to highlight. The neighbourhood of Les Grottes in Geneva can be described as a ‘manifesto of living’ based on sharing, solidarity, and freedom. On the other hand, the former Olympic Village in Turin expresses the “individual need to exist” of a population (of political refugees and migrants) not legitimatized to be in that place but one which, generally speaking, has nowhere to live. Discussion and evaluation These two situations are able to highlight how the right to housing today no longer has a universal meaning as in the struggles of the last century (70 s) but explodes in very different meanings. Conclusions For this reason the aim of this paper is try to rethink the concept of housing rights in order to emphasize how this term is still able to tell a lot about the urban and social transformations in contemporary cities.Cristina BianchettiIanira VassalloSpringerOpenarticleHousing rightsClaiming spacesSocial inequalityUrban transformation processesResidential segregationSocial SciencesHCommunities. Classes. RacesHT51-1595Urban groups. The city. Urban sociologyHT101-395ENCity, Territory and Architecture, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Housing rights
Claiming spaces
Social inequality
Urban transformation processes
Residential segregation
Social Sciences
H
Communities. Classes. Races
HT51-1595
Urban groups. The city. Urban sociology
HT101-395
spellingShingle Housing rights
Claiming spaces
Social inequality
Urban transformation processes
Residential segregation
Social Sciences
H
Communities. Classes. Races
HT51-1595
Urban groups. The city. Urban sociology
HT101-395
Cristina Bianchetti
Ianira Vassallo
Too many rights: too many people without rights—two opposite case studies of claiming spaces and rights in Turin and Geneva
description Abstract Introduction The multiple forms of living in the contemporary city clearly demonstrate how the relationship between living space and rights reveals itself in many ways, even to the point of being divergent and contradictory. Case description In order to analyze this point, we decided to observe two case studies that are emblematic for the divergence of issues that they are able to highlight. The neighbourhood of Les Grottes in Geneva can be described as a ‘manifesto of living’ based on sharing, solidarity, and freedom. On the other hand, the former Olympic Village in Turin expresses the “individual need to exist” of a population (of political refugees and migrants) not legitimatized to be in that place but one which, generally speaking, has nowhere to live. Discussion and evaluation These two situations are able to highlight how the right to housing today no longer has a universal meaning as in the struggles of the last century (70 s) but explodes in very different meanings. Conclusions For this reason the aim of this paper is try to rethink the concept of housing rights in order to emphasize how this term is still able to tell a lot about the urban and social transformations in contemporary cities.
format article
author Cristina Bianchetti
Ianira Vassallo
author_facet Cristina Bianchetti
Ianira Vassallo
author_sort Cristina Bianchetti
title Too many rights: too many people without rights—two opposite case studies of claiming spaces and rights in Turin and Geneva
title_short Too many rights: too many people without rights—two opposite case studies of claiming spaces and rights in Turin and Geneva
title_full Too many rights: too many people without rights—two opposite case studies of claiming spaces and rights in Turin and Geneva
title_fullStr Too many rights: too many people without rights—two opposite case studies of claiming spaces and rights in Turin and Geneva
title_full_unstemmed Too many rights: too many people without rights—two opposite case studies of claiming spaces and rights in Turin and Geneva
title_sort too many rights: too many people without rights—two opposite case studies of claiming spaces and rights in turin and geneva
publisher SpringerOpen
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d725edad37764ef2b263f25c5cec999d
work_keys_str_mv AT cristinabianchetti toomanyrightstoomanypeoplewithoutrightstwooppositecasestudiesofclaimingspacesandrightsinturinandgeneva
AT ianiravassallo toomanyrightstoomanypeoplewithoutrightstwooppositecasestudiesofclaimingspacesandrightsinturinandgeneva
_version_ 1718372044105580544