Residual malaria among migrant workers in Myanmar: why still persistent and how to eliminate it?

Abstract Background Residual malaria is probably an important source for the re-emergence of malaria infection in the elimination era. Assessment to identify the factors influencing residual malaria in high-risk groups is needed to develop evidence-based decisions by stakeholders and policymakers. M...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myat Htut Nyunt, Khin Myo Aye, Shine Thura Naing, Aye Su Mon, Mi Mi Htwe, Su Mon Win, Wai Myat Thwe, Ni Ni Zaw, Myat Phone Kyaw, Aung Thi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d72f37902435464fb3119eabcc64a81a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d72f37902435464fb3119eabcc64a81a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d72f37902435464fb3119eabcc64a81a2021-11-14T12:44:28ZResidual malaria among migrant workers in Myanmar: why still persistent and how to eliminate it?10.1186/s12879-021-06839-51471-2334https://doaj.org/article/d72f37902435464fb3119eabcc64a81a2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06839-5https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2334Abstract Background Residual malaria is probably an important source for the re-emergence of malaria infection in the elimination era. Assessment to identify the factors influencing residual malaria in high-risk groups is needed to develop evidence-based decisions by stakeholders and policymakers. Methods This study was conducted to explore the factors influencing the residual malaria infection among migrant workers in two sentinel sites (endemic vs. pre-elimination areas) in Myanmar using the mixed-model method. Results A total of 102 migrant respondents (65 in Bamauk and 37 in Shwegyin) were included for the quantitative assessment using pretested questionnaires during household visits. Although 87.3% of them had insecticidal bed nets (ITNs/LLINs), only 68.3% of the migrants in Bamauk and 57.9% in Shwegyin used it regularly. The use of any bed net was high (79.9% in Bamauk vs. 91.0% in Shwegyin). The mean LLINs in their families were 1.64 (95%CI: 1.48–1.81) in Bamauk and 2.89 (95%CI: 2.67–3.11) in Shwegyin. Most of them received no health information for malaria prevention within the last year and their knowledge about malaria was low. Their working nature was a challenge for control measures against malaria in migrants. Conclusion The strategy for distributing LLINs and health promotion activities for mobile/migrant populations should be reviewed, and an appropriate action plan should be developed for the specific migrant group. Moreover, health promotion activities for behavior change communication should be strengthened in the migrant population in Myanmar.Myat Htut NyuntKhin Myo AyeShine Thura NaingAye Su MonMi Mi HtweSu Mon WinWai Myat ThweNi Ni ZawMyat Phone KyawAung ThiBMCarticleMalariaMigrantsMalaria eliminationMyanmarInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216ENBMC Infectious Diseases, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Malaria
Migrants
Malaria elimination
Myanmar
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
spellingShingle Malaria
Migrants
Malaria elimination
Myanmar
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Myat Htut Nyunt
Khin Myo Aye
Shine Thura Naing
Aye Su Mon
Mi Mi Htwe
Su Mon Win
Wai Myat Thwe
Ni Ni Zaw
Myat Phone Kyaw
Aung Thi
Residual malaria among migrant workers in Myanmar: why still persistent and how to eliminate it?
description Abstract Background Residual malaria is probably an important source for the re-emergence of malaria infection in the elimination era. Assessment to identify the factors influencing residual malaria in high-risk groups is needed to develop evidence-based decisions by stakeholders and policymakers. Methods This study was conducted to explore the factors influencing the residual malaria infection among migrant workers in two sentinel sites (endemic vs. pre-elimination areas) in Myanmar using the mixed-model method. Results A total of 102 migrant respondents (65 in Bamauk and 37 in Shwegyin) were included for the quantitative assessment using pretested questionnaires during household visits. Although 87.3% of them had insecticidal bed nets (ITNs/LLINs), only 68.3% of the migrants in Bamauk and 57.9% in Shwegyin used it regularly. The use of any bed net was high (79.9% in Bamauk vs. 91.0% in Shwegyin). The mean LLINs in their families were 1.64 (95%CI: 1.48–1.81) in Bamauk and 2.89 (95%CI: 2.67–3.11) in Shwegyin. Most of them received no health information for malaria prevention within the last year and their knowledge about malaria was low. Their working nature was a challenge for control measures against malaria in migrants. Conclusion The strategy for distributing LLINs and health promotion activities for mobile/migrant populations should be reviewed, and an appropriate action plan should be developed for the specific migrant group. Moreover, health promotion activities for behavior change communication should be strengthened in the migrant population in Myanmar.
format article
author Myat Htut Nyunt
Khin Myo Aye
Shine Thura Naing
Aye Su Mon
Mi Mi Htwe
Su Mon Win
Wai Myat Thwe
Ni Ni Zaw
Myat Phone Kyaw
Aung Thi
author_facet Myat Htut Nyunt
Khin Myo Aye
Shine Thura Naing
Aye Su Mon
Mi Mi Htwe
Su Mon Win
Wai Myat Thwe
Ni Ni Zaw
Myat Phone Kyaw
Aung Thi
author_sort Myat Htut Nyunt
title Residual malaria among migrant workers in Myanmar: why still persistent and how to eliminate it?
title_short Residual malaria among migrant workers in Myanmar: why still persistent and how to eliminate it?
title_full Residual malaria among migrant workers in Myanmar: why still persistent and how to eliminate it?
title_fullStr Residual malaria among migrant workers in Myanmar: why still persistent and how to eliminate it?
title_full_unstemmed Residual malaria among migrant workers in Myanmar: why still persistent and how to eliminate it?
title_sort residual malaria among migrant workers in myanmar: why still persistent and how to eliminate it?
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d72f37902435464fb3119eabcc64a81a
work_keys_str_mv AT myathtutnyunt residualmalariaamongmigrantworkersinmyanmarwhystillpersistentandhowtoeliminateit
AT khinmyoaye residualmalariaamongmigrantworkersinmyanmarwhystillpersistentandhowtoeliminateit
AT shinethuranaing residualmalariaamongmigrantworkersinmyanmarwhystillpersistentandhowtoeliminateit
AT ayesumon residualmalariaamongmigrantworkersinmyanmarwhystillpersistentandhowtoeliminateit
AT mimihtwe residualmalariaamongmigrantworkersinmyanmarwhystillpersistentandhowtoeliminateit
AT sumonwin residualmalariaamongmigrantworkersinmyanmarwhystillpersistentandhowtoeliminateit
AT waimyatthwe residualmalariaamongmigrantworkersinmyanmarwhystillpersistentandhowtoeliminateit
AT ninizaw residualmalariaamongmigrantworkersinmyanmarwhystillpersistentandhowtoeliminateit
AT myatphonekyaw residualmalariaamongmigrantworkersinmyanmarwhystillpersistentandhowtoeliminateit
AT aungthi residualmalariaamongmigrantworkersinmyanmarwhystillpersistentandhowtoeliminateit
_version_ 1718429076921778176