Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma

Adel Galal Zaky,1 Ahmed Tarek Yassin,2 Saber Hamed El Sayid1 1Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El Kom, Menoufia, Egypt; 2Ophthalmology Department, Banha Educational Hospital, Banha, El Kalyobia, Egypt Objective: To assess the role and diagnostic effectiven...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaky AG, Yassin AT, El Sayid SH
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
OCT
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d75f862acd13464db4853372ffa165a9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d75f862acd13464db4853372ffa165a9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d75f862acd13464db4853372ffa165a92021-12-02T02:48:53ZShort wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/d75f862acd13464db4853372ffa165a92016-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/short-wavendashautomated-perimetry-versus-optical-coherence-tomography-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Adel Galal Zaky,1 Ahmed Tarek Yassin,2 Saber Hamed El Sayid1 1Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El Kom, Menoufia, Egypt; 2Ophthalmology Department, Banha Educational Hospital, Banha, El Kalyobia, Egypt Objective: To assess the role and diagnostic effectiveness of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) to distinguish between normal, glaucoma suspects, and surely diagnosed glaucomatous eye.Background: Changes in the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) often precede the appearance of visual field defect with standard automated perimetry. Unfortunately, RNFL defect can be difficult to identify during clinical examination. Early detection of glaucoma is still controversial, whether by OCT, SWAP, or frequency-doubling technology perimetry.Patients and methods: In this randomized controlled, consecutive, prospective study, a total 70 subjects (140 eyes) were included in the study, divided into three groups: Group A, 10 healthy volunteers (20 eyes); Group B, 30 patients (60 eyes) with glaucoma suspect; and Group C, 30 patients (60 eyes) with already diagnosed glaucomatous eyes.Results: Average RNFL thickness was 75±9.0 in the glaucoma group, 99±15.5 in the control group, and 94±12 in glaucoma suspect. The inferior quadrant was the early parameter affected. There was significant correlation between visual field parameters and RNFL thickness in both glaucoma and glaucoma suspect groups.Conclusion: Both RNFL thickness measured by OCT and SWAP indices are good discrimination tools between glaucomatous, glaucoma suspect, and normal eyes. OCT parameters tend to be more sensitive than SWAP parameters. Keywords: OCT, SWAP, glaucoma, intraocular pressure, RNFLZaky AGYassin ATEl Sayid SHDove Medical PressarticleOCTSWAPGlaucomaOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 10, Pp 1819-1824 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic OCT
SWAP
Glaucoma
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle OCT
SWAP
Glaucoma
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Zaky AG
Yassin AT
El Sayid SH
Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma
description Adel Galal Zaky,1 Ahmed Tarek Yassin,2 Saber Hamed El Sayid1 1Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El Kom, Menoufia, Egypt; 2Ophthalmology Department, Banha Educational Hospital, Banha, El Kalyobia, Egypt Objective: To assess the role and diagnostic effectiveness of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) to distinguish between normal, glaucoma suspects, and surely diagnosed glaucomatous eye.Background: Changes in the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) often precede the appearance of visual field defect with standard automated perimetry. Unfortunately, RNFL defect can be difficult to identify during clinical examination. Early detection of glaucoma is still controversial, whether by OCT, SWAP, or frequency-doubling technology perimetry.Patients and methods: In this randomized controlled, consecutive, prospective study, a total 70 subjects (140 eyes) were included in the study, divided into three groups: Group A, 10 healthy volunteers (20 eyes); Group B, 30 patients (60 eyes) with glaucoma suspect; and Group C, 30 patients (60 eyes) with already diagnosed glaucomatous eyes.Results: Average RNFL thickness was 75±9.0 in the glaucoma group, 99±15.5 in the control group, and 94±12 in glaucoma suspect. The inferior quadrant was the early parameter affected. There was significant correlation between visual field parameters and RNFL thickness in both glaucoma and glaucoma suspect groups.Conclusion: Both RNFL thickness measured by OCT and SWAP indices are good discrimination tools between glaucomatous, glaucoma suspect, and normal eyes. OCT parameters tend to be more sensitive than SWAP parameters. Keywords: OCT, SWAP, glaucoma, intraocular pressure, RNFL
format article
author Zaky AG
Yassin AT
El Sayid SH
author_facet Zaky AG
Yassin AT
El Sayid SH
author_sort Zaky AG
title Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma
title_short Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma
title_full Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma
title_fullStr Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Short wave–automated perimetry (SWAP) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma
title_sort short wave–automated perimetry (swap) versus optical coherence tomography in early detection of glaucoma
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/d75f862acd13464db4853372ffa165a9
work_keys_str_mv AT zakyag shortwavendashautomatedperimetryswapversusopticalcoherencetomographyinearlydetectionofglaucoma
AT yassinat shortwavendashautomatedperimetryswapversusopticalcoherencetomographyinearlydetectionofglaucoma
AT elsayidsh shortwavendashautomatedperimetryswapversusopticalcoherencetomographyinearlydetectionofglaucoma
_version_ 1718402130109267968