AVALIAÇÃO DA EVOLUÇÃO DO ÍNDICE GERAL DE CURSOS - IGC DAS INSTITUIÇÕES DE ENSINO SUPERIOR DE SANTA CATARINA

The competitiveness in the education sector makes Higher Education Institution (HEI) to be attentive to the quality of service they offer, aiming to maintain and win new students, partners or investors. For many students, the institution's image and its perceived quality are the main criteria i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cleber Cervi, Adriane Cervi Blümke
Formato: article
Lenguaje:ES
PT
Publicado: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina 2019
Materias:
igc
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.5007/1983-4535.2019v12n1p162
https://doaj.org/article/d77b3253ad45408fa8c76b58ebcaba0c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d77b3253ad45408fa8c76b58ebcaba0c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d77b3253ad45408fa8c76b58ebcaba0c2021-11-11T15:49:49ZAVALIAÇÃO DA EVOLUÇÃO DO ÍNDICE GERAL DE CURSOS - IGC DAS INSTITUIÇÕES DE ENSINO SUPERIOR DE SANTA CATARINA1983-4535https://doi.org/10.5007/1983-4535.2019v12n1p162https://doaj.org/article/d77b3253ad45408fa8c76b58ebcaba0c2019-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=319357660008https://doaj.org/toc/1983-4535The competitiveness in the education sector makes Higher Education Institution (HEI) to be attentive to the quality of service they offer, aiming to maintain and win new students, partners or investors. For many students, the institution's image and its perceived quality are the main criteria in choosing an HEI and it is transmitted, often, through the media that publishes rankings. Most rankings and indicators take into account the concepts of General Index of Courses - IGC, so HEI’s managers should be aware of them, looking for strategies to improve them, as they will be responsible for conveying the quality of HEIs and course. Thus, this study sought to determine the evolution of IGC of the Santa Catarina’s HEI from 2007 to 2014 and if has difference in the quality of public and private HEI, as well as to evaluate the difference between types of academic organization – namely university, university centers, colleges and federal institutes, in order to examine whether disclosure of such indicators really serves as a promoter of improvement in the quality of the HEI. Using data from the E-MEC system and with the help of statistical techniques it’s possible to conclude that (1) the evolution of the IGC was marginally significant in the analyzed period, (2) the universities have higher IGC than colleges only in three analyzed years, (3) the public’s HEI are superior of private’s HEI.Cleber CerviAdriane Cervi BlümkeUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarinaarticleigcquality indicatorshigher education institutionEducation (General)L7-991Special aspects of educationLC8-6691ESPTRevista Gestão Universitária na América Latina , Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 162-182 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language ES
PT
topic igc
quality indicators
higher education institution
Education (General)
L7-991
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle igc
quality indicators
higher education institution
Education (General)
L7-991
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Cleber Cervi
Adriane Cervi Blümke
AVALIAÇÃO DA EVOLUÇÃO DO ÍNDICE GERAL DE CURSOS - IGC DAS INSTITUIÇÕES DE ENSINO SUPERIOR DE SANTA CATARINA
description The competitiveness in the education sector makes Higher Education Institution (HEI) to be attentive to the quality of service they offer, aiming to maintain and win new students, partners or investors. For many students, the institution's image and its perceived quality are the main criteria in choosing an HEI and it is transmitted, often, through the media that publishes rankings. Most rankings and indicators take into account the concepts of General Index of Courses - IGC, so HEI’s managers should be aware of them, looking for strategies to improve them, as they will be responsible for conveying the quality of HEIs and course. Thus, this study sought to determine the evolution of IGC of the Santa Catarina’s HEI from 2007 to 2014 and if has difference in the quality of public and private HEI, as well as to evaluate the difference between types of academic organization – namely university, university centers, colleges and federal institutes, in order to examine whether disclosure of such indicators really serves as a promoter of improvement in the quality of the HEI. Using data from the E-MEC system and with the help of statistical techniques it’s possible to conclude that (1) the evolution of the IGC was marginally significant in the analyzed period, (2) the universities have higher IGC than colleges only in three analyzed years, (3) the public’s HEI are superior of private’s HEI.
format article
author Cleber Cervi
Adriane Cervi Blümke
author_facet Cleber Cervi
Adriane Cervi Blümke
author_sort Cleber Cervi
title AVALIAÇÃO DA EVOLUÇÃO DO ÍNDICE GERAL DE CURSOS - IGC DAS INSTITUIÇÕES DE ENSINO SUPERIOR DE SANTA CATARINA
title_short AVALIAÇÃO DA EVOLUÇÃO DO ÍNDICE GERAL DE CURSOS - IGC DAS INSTITUIÇÕES DE ENSINO SUPERIOR DE SANTA CATARINA
title_full AVALIAÇÃO DA EVOLUÇÃO DO ÍNDICE GERAL DE CURSOS - IGC DAS INSTITUIÇÕES DE ENSINO SUPERIOR DE SANTA CATARINA
title_fullStr AVALIAÇÃO DA EVOLUÇÃO DO ÍNDICE GERAL DE CURSOS - IGC DAS INSTITUIÇÕES DE ENSINO SUPERIOR DE SANTA CATARINA
title_full_unstemmed AVALIAÇÃO DA EVOLUÇÃO DO ÍNDICE GERAL DE CURSOS - IGC DAS INSTITUIÇÕES DE ENSINO SUPERIOR DE SANTA CATARINA
title_sort avaliação da evolução do índice geral de cursos - igc das instituições de ensino superior de santa catarina
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.5007/1983-4535.2019v12n1p162
https://doaj.org/article/d77b3253ad45408fa8c76b58ebcaba0c
work_keys_str_mv AT clebercervi avaliacaodaevolucaodoindicegeraldecursosigcdasinstituicoesdeensinosuperiordesantacatarina
AT adrianecerviblumke avaliacaodaevolucaodoindicegeraldecursosigcdasinstituicoesdeensinosuperiordesantacatarina
_version_ 1718433605593595904