Author Correction: Low frequency transcranial electrical stimulation does not entrain sleep rhythms measured by human intracranial recordings

It has come to our attention that we did not specify whether the stimulation magnitudes we report in this Article are peak amplitudes or peak-to-peak. All references to intensity given in mA in the manuscript refer to peak-to-peak amplitudes, except in Fig. 2, where the model is calibrated to 1 mA p...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Belen Lafon, Simon Henin, Yu Huang, Daniel Friedman, Lucia Melloni, Thomas Thesen, Werner Doyle, György Buzsáki, Orrin Devinsky, Lucas C. Parra, Anli Liu
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:	Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d77f86040daa4bf782bec7da13cfefe1
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d77f86040daa4bf782bec7da13cfefe1
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d77f86040daa4bf782bec7da13cfefe12021-12-02T14:40:09ZAuthor Correction: Low frequency transcranial electrical stimulation does not entrain sleep rhythms measured by human intracranial recordings10.1038/s41467-018-03392-92041-1723https://doaj.org/article/d77f86040daa4bf782bec7da13cfefe12018-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03392-9https://doaj.org/toc/2041-1723It has come to our attention that we did not specify whether the stimulation magnitudes we report in this Article are peak amplitudes or peak-to-peak. All references to intensity given in mA in the manuscript refer to peak-to-peak amplitudes, except in Fig. 2, where the model is calibrated to 1 mA peak amplitude, as stated. In the original version of the paper we incorrectly calibrated the computational models to 1 mA peak-to-peak, rather than 1 mA peak amplitude. This means that we divided by a value twice as large as we should have. The correct estimated fields are therefore twice as large as shown in the original Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figure 11. The corrected figures are now properly calibrated to 1 mA peak amplitude. Furthermore, the sentence in the first paragraph of the Results section ‘Intensity ranged from 0.5 to 2.5 mA (current density 0.125–0.625 mA mA/cm2), which is stronger than in previous reports’, should have read ‘Intensity ranged from 0.5 to 2.5 mA peak to peak (peak current density 0.0625–0.3125 mA/cm2), which is stronger than in previous reports.’ These errors do not affect any of the Article’s conclusions.Belen LafonSimon HeninYu HuangDaniel FriedmanLucia MelloniThomas ThesenWerner DoyleGyörgy BuzsákiOrrin DevinskyLucas C. ParraAnli LiuNature PortfolioarticleScienceQENNature Communications, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-2 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Science Q
spellingShingle	Science Q Belen Lafon Simon Henin Yu Huang Daniel Friedman Lucia Melloni Thomas Thesen Werner Doyle György Buzsáki Orrin Devinsky Lucas C. Parra Anli Liu Author Correction: Low frequency transcranial electrical stimulation does not entrain sleep rhythms measured by human intracranial recordings
description	It has come to our attention that we did not specify whether the stimulation magnitudes we report in this Article are peak amplitudes or peak-to-peak. All references to intensity given in mA in the manuscript refer to peak-to-peak amplitudes, except in Fig. 2, where the model is calibrated to 1 mA peak amplitude, as stated. In the original version of the paper we incorrectly calibrated the computational models to 1 mA peak-to-peak, rather than 1 mA peak amplitude. This means that we divided by a value twice as large as we should have. The correct estimated fields are therefore twice as large as shown in the original Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figure 11. The corrected figures are now properly calibrated to 1 mA peak amplitude. Furthermore, the sentence in the first paragraph of the Results section ‘Intensity ranged from 0.5 to 2.5 mA (current density 0.125–0.625 mA mA/cm2), which is stronger than in previous reports’, should have read ‘Intensity ranged from 0.5 to 2.5 mA peak to peak (peak current density 0.0625–0.3125 mA/cm2), which is stronger than in previous reports.’ These errors do not affect any of the Article’s conclusions.
format	article
author	Belen Lafon Simon Henin Yu Huang Daniel Friedman Lucia Melloni Thomas Thesen Werner Doyle György Buzsáki Orrin Devinsky Lucas C. Parra Anli Liu
author_facet	Belen Lafon Simon Henin Yu Huang Daniel Friedman Lucia Melloni Thomas Thesen Werner Doyle György Buzsáki Orrin Devinsky Lucas C. Parra Anli Liu
author_sort	Belen Lafon
title	Author Correction: Low frequency transcranial electrical stimulation does not entrain sleep rhythms measured by human intracranial recordings
title_short	Author Correction: Low frequency transcranial electrical stimulation does not entrain sleep rhythms measured by human intracranial recordings
title_full	Author Correction: Low frequency transcranial electrical stimulation does not entrain sleep rhythms measured by human intracranial recordings
title_fullStr	Author Correction: Low frequency transcranial electrical stimulation does not entrain sleep rhythms measured by human intracranial recordings
title_full_unstemmed	Author Correction: Low frequency transcranial electrical stimulation does not entrain sleep rhythms measured by human intracranial recordings
title_sort	author correction: low frequency transcranial electrical stimulation does not entrain sleep rhythms measured by human intracranial recordings
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/d77f86040daa4bf782bec7da13cfefe1
work_keys_str_mv	AT belenlafon authorcorrectionlowfrequencytranscranialelectricalstimulationdoesnotentrainsleeprhythmsmeasuredbyhumanintracranialrecordings AT simonhenin authorcorrectionlowfrequencytranscranialelectricalstimulationdoesnotentrainsleeprhythmsmeasuredbyhumanintracranialrecordings AT yuhuang authorcorrectionlowfrequencytranscranialelectricalstimulationdoesnotentrainsleeprhythmsmeasuredbyhumanintracranialrecordings AT danielfriedman authorcorrectionlowfrequencytranscranialelectricalstimulationdoesnotentrainsleeprhythmsmeasuredbyhumanintracranialrecordings AT luciamelloni authorcorrectionlowfrequencytranscranialelectricalstimulationdoesnotentrainsleeprhythmsmeasuredbyhumanintracranialrecordings AT thomasthesen authorcorrectionlowfrequencytranscranialelectricalstimulationdoesnotentrainsleeprhythmsmeasuredbyhumanintracranialrecordings AT wernerdoyle authorcorrectionlowfrequencytranscranialelectricalstimulationdoesnotentrainsleeprhythmsmeasuredbyhumanintracranialrecordings AT gyorgybuzsaki authorcorrectionlowfrequencytranscranialelectricalstimulationdoesnotentrainsleeprhythmsmeasuredbyhumanintracranialrecordings AT orrindevinsky authorcorrectionlowfrequencytranscranialelectricalstimulationdoesnotentrainsleeprhythmsmeasuredbyhumanintracranialrecordings AT lucascparra authorcorrectionlowfrequencytranscranialelectricalstimulationdoesnotentrainsleeprhythmsmeasuredbyhumanintracranialrecordings AT anliliu authorcorrectionlowfrequencytranscranialelectricalstimulationdoesnotentrainsleeprhythmsmeasuredbyhumanintracranialrecordings
_version_	1718390445860454400

Author Correction: Low frequency transcranial electrical stimulation does not entrain sleep rhythms measured by human intracranial recordings

Ejemplares similares