State of the art methods to post-process mechanical test data to characterize the hot deformation behavior of metals

Materials engineering and science rely heavily on the indirect measurement of plastic stress and strain by post-processing of mechanical test data, including tension, torsion, and compression test. There is no consensus among researchers regarding the best test or the post-processing theory nor do a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahin Khoddam, Soheil Solhjoo, Peter D Hodgson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SAGE Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d78fa354929548c9b9615891c0658562
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d78fa354929548c9b9615891c0658562
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d78fa354929548c9b9615891c06585622021-11-23T05:33:19ZState of the art methods to post-process mechanical test data to characterize the hot deformation behavior of metals1687-814010.1177/16878140211061026https://doaj.org/article/d78fa354929548c9b9615891c06585622021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1177/16878140211061026https://doaj.org/toc/1687-8140Materials engineering and science rely heavily on the indirect measurement of plastic stress and strain by post-processing of mechanical test data, including tension, torsion, and compression test. There is no consensus among researchers regarding the best test or the post-processing theory nor do adequate standards exist on the characterization methods. The tests are typically performed as customized tests, discrepancies exist in the flow curves obtained by different methods and the chosen mechanical test. More critically, the curves are dominantly treated (perceived) as a set of measured data rather than calculated values. The plasticity-based calculated flow curves and their gradients are, in turn, the basis for several second-tier indirect measurements, such as stacking fault energy and recrystallization. Such measurements are quite prone to errors due to oversimplified post-processing of the tests’ data and can only be experimentally verified in a qualitative or in an average fashion. Therefore, their findings are highly restricted by the limitations of each test, data type and post-processing method, and should be used carefully. This review examines some of the most commonly used data conversion methods and some recent developments in the field followed by recommendations. It will highlight the need to develop test rigs that can provide new data types and to provide advanced post-processing techniques for the indirect measurement.Shahin KhoddamSoheil SolhjooPeter D HodgsonSAGE PublishingarticleMechanical engineering and machineryTJ1-1570ENAdvances in Mechanical Engineering, Vol 13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ1-1570
spellingShingle Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ1-1570
Shahin Khoddam
Soheil Solhjoo
Peter D Hodgson
State of the art methods to post-process mechanical test data to characterize the hot deformation behavior of metals
description Materials engineering and science rely heavily on the indirect measurement of plastic stress and strain by post-processing of mechanical test data, including tension, torsion, and compression test. There is no consensus among researchers regarding the best test or the post-processing theory nor do adequate standards exist on the characterization methods. The tests are typically performed as customized tests, discrepancies exist in the flow curves obtained by different methods and the chosen mechanical test. More critically, the curves are dominantly treated (perceived) as a set of measured data rather than calculated values. The plasticity-based calculated flow curves and their gradients are, in turn, the basis for several second-tier indirect measurements, such as stacking fault energy and recrystallization. Such measurements are quite prone to errors due to oversimplified post-processing of the tests’ data and can only be experimentally verified in a qualitative or in an average fashion. Therefore, their findings are highly restricted by the limitations of each test, data type and post-processing method, and should be used carefully. This review examines some of the most commonly used data conversion methods and some recent developments in the field followed by recommendations. It will highlight the need to develop test rigs that can provide new data types and to provide advanced post-processing techniques for the indirect measurement.
format article
author Shahin Khoddam
Soheil Solhjoo
Peter D Hodgson
author_facet Shahin Khoddam
Soheil Solhjoo
Peter D Hodgson
author_sort Shahin Khoddam
title State of the art methods to post-process mechanical test data to characterize the hot deformation behavior of metals
title_short State of the art methods to post-process mechanical test data to characterize the hot deformation behavior of metals
title_full State of the art methods to post-process mechanical test data to characterize the hot deformation behavior of metals
title_fullStr State of the art methods to post-process mechanical test data to characterize the hot deformation behavior of metals
title_full_unstemmed State of the art methods to post-process mechanical test data to characterize the hot deformation behavior of metals
title_sort state of the art methods to post-process mechanical test data to characterize the hot deformation behavior of metals
publisher SAGE Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d78fa354929548c9b9615891c0658562
work_keys_str_mv AT shahinkhoddam stateoftheartmethodstopostprocessmechanicaltestdatatocharacterizethehotdeformationbehaviorofmetals
AT soheilsolhjoo stateoftheartmethodstopostprocessmechanicaltestdatatocharacterizethehotdeformationbehaviorofmetals
AT peterdhodgson stateoftheartmethodstopostprocessmechanicaltestdatatocharacterizethehotdeformationbehaviorofmetals
_version_ 1718417350452051968