Vaccination strategies against COVID-19 and the diffusion of anti-vaccination views
Abstract Misinformation is usually adjusted to fit distinct narratives and propagates rapidly through social networks. False beliefs, once adopted, are rarely corrected. Amidst the COVID-19 crisis, pandemic-deniers and people who oppose wearing face masks or quarantine have already been a substantia...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d79f2b2f7a8d4f04bf2d872691d719d8 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d79f2b2f7a8d4f04bf2d872691d719d8 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d79f2b2f7a8d4f04bf2d872691d719d82021-12-02T16:36:13ZVaccination strategies against COVID-19 and the diffusion of anti-vaccination views10.1038/s41598-021-85555-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/d79f2b2f7a8d4f04bf2d872691d719d82021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85555-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Misinformation is usually adjusted to fit distinct narratives and propagates rapidly through social networks. False beliefs, once adopted, are rarely corrected. Amidst the COVID-19 crisis, pandemic-deniers and people who oppose wearing face masks or quarantine have already been a substantial aspect of the development of the pandemic. With the vaccine for COVID-19, different anti-vaccine narratives are being created and are probably being adopted by large population groups with critical consequences. Assuming full adherence to vaccine administration, we use a diffusion model to analyse epidemic spreading and the impact of different vaccination strategies, measured with the average years of life lost, in three network topologies (a proximity, a scale-free and a small-world network). Then, using a similar diffusion model, we consider the spread of anti-vaccine views in the network, which are adopted based on a persuasiveness parameter of anti-vaccine views. Results show that even if anti-vaccine narratives have a small persuasiveness, a large part of the population will be rapidly exposed to them. Assuming that all individuals are equally likely to adopt anti-vaccine views after being exposed, more central nodes in the network, which are more exposed to these views, are more likely to adopt them. Comparing years of life lost, anti-vaccine views could have a significant cost not only on those who share them, since the core social benefits of a limited vaccination strategy (reduction of susceptible hosts, network disruptions and slowing the spread of the disease) are substantially shortened.Rafael Prieto CurielHumberto González RamírezNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Rafael Prieto Curiel Humberto González Ramírez Vaccination strategies against COVID-19 and the diffusion of anti-vaccination views |
description |
Abstract Misinformation is usually adjusted to fit distinct narratives and propagates rapidly through social networks. False beliefs, once adopted, are rarely corrected. Amidst the COVID-19 crisis, pandemic-deniers and people who oppose wearing face masks or quarantine have already been a substantial aspect of the development of the pandemic. With the vaccine for COVID-19, different anti-vaccine narratives are being created and are probably being adopted by large population groups with critical consequences. Assuming full adherence to vaccine administration, we use a diffusion model to analyse epidemic spreading and the impact of different vaccination strategies, measured with the average years of life lost, in three network topologies (a proximity, a scale-free and a small-world network). Then, using a similar diffusion model, we consider the spread of anti-vaccine views in the network, which are adopted based on a persuasiveness parameter of anti-vaccine views. Results show that even if anti-vaccine narratives have a small persuasiveness, a large part of the population will be rapidly exposed to them. Assuming that all individuals are equally likely to adopt anti-vaccine views after being exposed, more central nodes in the network, which are more exposed to these views, are more likely to adopt them. Comparing years of life lost, anti-vaccine views could have a significant cost not only on those who share them, since the core social benefits of a limited vaccination strategy (reduction of susceptible hosts, network disruptions and slowing the spread of the disease) are substantially shortened. |
format |
article |
author |
Rafael Prieto Curiel Humberto González Ramírez |
author_facet |
Rafael Prieto Curiel Humberto González Ramírez |
author_sort |
Rafael Prieto Curiel |
title |
Vaccination strategies against COVID-19 and the diffusion of anti-vaccination views |
title_short |
Vaccination strategies against COVID-19 and the diffusion of anti-vaccination views |
title_full |
Vaccination strategies against COVID-19 and the diffusion of anti-vaccination views |
title_fullStr |
Vaccination strategies against COVID-19 and the diffusion of anti-vaccination views |
title_full_unstemmed |
Vaccination strategies against COVID-19 and the diffusion of anti-vaccination views |
title_sort |
vaccination strategies against covid-19 and the diffusion of anti-vaccination views |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d79f2b2f7a8d4f04bf2d872691d719d8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rafaelprietocuriel vaccinationstrategiesagainstcovid19andthediffusionofantivaccinationviews AT humbertogonzalezramirez vaccinationstrategiesagainstcovid19andthediffusionofantivaccinationviews |
_version_ |
1718383661293764608 |