A review and comparison of breast tumor cell nuclei segmentation performances using deep convolutional neural networks
Abstract Breast cancer is currently the second most common cause of cancer-related death in women. Presently, the clinical benchmark in cancer diagnosis is tissue biopsy examination. However, the manual process of histopathological analysis is laborious, time-consuming, and limited by the quality of...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d7bbeb5b75be4d00a2d11586bba4830e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d7bbeb5b75be4d00a2d11586bba4830e |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d7bbeb5b75be4d00a2d11586bba4830e2021-12-02T15:51:13ZA review and comparison of breast tumor cell nuclei segmentation performances using deep convolutional neural networks10.1038/s41598-021-87496-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/d7bbeb5b75be4d00a2d11586bba4830e2021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87496-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Breast cancer is currently the second most common cause of cancer-related death in women. Presently, the clinical benchmark in cancer diagnosis is tissue biopsy examination. However, the manual process of histopathological analysis is laborious, time-consuming, and limited by the quality of the specimen and the experience of the pathologist. This study's objective was to determine if deep convolutional neural networks can be trained, with transfer learning, on a set of histopathological images independent of breast tissue to segment tumor nuclei of the breast. Various deep convolutional neural networks were evaluated for the study, including U-Net, Mask R-CNN, and a novel network (GB U-Net). The networks were trained on a set of Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained images of eight diverse types of tissues. GB U-Net demonstrated superior performance in segmenting sites of invasive diseases (AJI = 0.53, mAP = 0.39 & AJI = 0.54, mAP = 0.38), validated on two hold-out datasets exclusively containing breast tissue images of approximately 7,582 annotated cells. The results of the networks, trained on images independent of breast tissue, demonstrated that tumor nuclei of the breast could be accurately segmented.Andrew LagreeMajidreza MohebpourNicholas MetiKhadijeh SaedniaFang-I. LuElzbieta SlodkowskaSonal GandhiEileen RakovitchAlex ShenfieldAli Sadeghi-NainiWilliam T. TranNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Andrew Lagree Majidreza Mohebpour Nicholas Meti Khadijeh Saednia Fang-I. Lu Elzbieta Slodkowska Sonal Gandhi Eileen Rakovitch Alex Shenfield Ali Sadeghi-Naini William T. Tran A review and comparison of breast tumor cell nuclei segmentation performances using deep convolutional neural networks |
description |
Abstract Breast cancer is currently the second most common cause of cancer-related death in women. Presently, the clinical benchmark in cancer diagnosis is tissue biopsy examination. However, the manual process of histopathological analysis is laborious, time-consuming, and limited by the quality of the specimen and the experience of the pathologist. This study's objective was to determine if deep convolutional neural networks can be trained, with transfer learning, on a set of histopathological images independent of breast tissue to segment tumor nuclei of the breast. Various deep convolutional neural networks were evaluated for the study, including U-Net, Mask R-CNN, and a novel network (GB U-Net). The networks were trained on a set of Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained images of eight diverse types of tissues. GB U-Net demonstrated superior performance in segmenting sites of invasive diseases (AJI = 0.53, mAP = 0.39 & AJI = 0.54, mAP = 0.38), validated on two hold-out datasets exclusively containing breast tissue images of approximately 7,582 annotated cells. The results of the networks, trained on images independent of breast tissue, demonstrated that tumor nuclei of the breast could be accurately segmented. |
format |
article |
author |
Andrew Lagree Majidreza Mohebpour Nicholas Meti Khadijeh Saednia Fang-I. Lu Elzbieta Slodkowska Sonal Gandhi Eileen Rakovitch Alex Shenfield Ali Sadeghi-Naini William T. Tran |
author_facet |
Andrew Lagree Majidreza Mohebpour Nicholas Meti Khadijeh Saednia Fang-I. Lu Elzbieta Slodkowska Sonal Gandhi Eileen Rakovitch Alex Shenfield Ali Sadeghi-Naini William T. Tran |
author_sort |
Andrew Lagree |
title |
A review and comparison of breast tumor cell nuclei segmentation performances using deep convolutional neural networks |
title_short |
A review and comparison of breast tumor cell nuclei segmentation performances using deep convolutional neural networks |
title_full |
A review and comparison of breast tumor cell nuclei segmentation performances using deep convolutional neural networks |
title_fullStr |
A review and comparison of breast tumor cell nuclei segmentation performances using deep convolutional neural networks |
title_full_unstemmed |
A review and comparison of breast tumor cell nuclei segmentation performances using deep convolutional neural networks |
title_sort |
review and comparison of breast tumor cell nuclei segmentation performances using deep convolutional neural networks |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d7bbeb5b75be4d00a2d11586bba4830e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andrewlagree areviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT majidrezamohebpour areviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT nicholasmeti areviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT khadijehsaednia areviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT fangilu areviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT elzbietaslodkowska areviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT sonalgandhi areviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT eileenrakovitch areviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT alexshenfield areviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT alisadeghinaini areviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT williamttran areviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT andrewlagree reviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT majidrezamohebpour reviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT nicholasmeti reviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT khadijehsaednia reviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT fangilu reviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT elzbietaslodkowska reviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT sonalgandhi reviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT eileenrakovitch reviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT alexshenfield reviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT alisadeghinaini reviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT williamttran reviewandcomparisonofbreasttumorcellnucleisegmentationperformancesusingdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworks |
_version_ |
1718385661909663744 |