Contestation ou négociation à Jakarta ? Deux quartiers face aux projets urbains de la métropole

As a metropolis and the capital city of Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta fits into the neoliberal context, producing competition between spaces and cities. These kinds of urban production and urban management do not reduce inequalities inside the urban area. Moreover, it contributes to strain land acc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Judicaëlle Dietrich
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR IT PT
Publicado:	Unité Mixte de Recherche 8504 Géographie-cités 2015
Materias:	contestation informal Jakarta land use conflict negotiation power relations Geography (General) G1-922
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d7db9c09cf4048e996e58cef04d57775
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d7db9c09cf4048e996e58cef04d57775
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d7db9c09cf4048e996e58cef04d577752021-12-02T11:12:34ZContestation ou négociation à Jakarta ? Deux quartiers face aux projets urbains de la métropole1278-336610.4000/cybergeo.27370https://doaj.org/article/d7db9c09cf4048e996e58cef04d577752015-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/cybergeo/27370https://doaj.org/toc/1278-3366As a metropolis and the capital city of Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta fits into the neoliberal context, producing competition between spaces and cities. These kinds of urban production and urban management do not reduce inequalities inside the urban area. Moreover, it contributes to strain land access. We can question the governance modes in that metropolitan context. This paper compares two areas and its stakeholders in different phases of the urban project. The aim is to describe the negotiation and the contestation according to several factors: the legal status of people and of the land, the size of the community involved, the principles of urban development. At local scale, the top down production of the city is less relevant. Urban governance practices highlight new power relations and negotiation. The emergence of informal governments is linked to contested land uses. Also, some daily quiet encroachments cohabit with official planning practices: it contributes to the production of inequalities and vulnerability inside the city. In Budidharma (North Jakarta), a household’s group helped by a NGO can negotiate with the owner (a developer company) and the local government to avoid their eviction. In Bintara (Bekasi), some residents resisted hardily against a residential high standing compound project because of unclear land use. They may be forced to leave this area very quickly. These two case studies question uses of ordinary citizen and of urban planners between individualization of social relations and collective mobilization.Judicaëlle DietrichUnité Mixte de Recherche 8504 Géographie-citésarticlecontestationinformalJakartaland use conflictnegotiationpower relationsGeography (General)G1-922DEENFRITPTCybergeo (2015)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR IT PT
topic	contestation informal Jakarta land use conflict negotiation power relations Geography (General) G1-922
spellingShingle	contestation informal Jakarta land use conflict negotiation power relations Geography (General) G1-922 Judicaëlle Dietrich Contestation ou négociation à Jakarta ? Deux quartiers face aux projets urbains de la métropole
description	As a metropolis and the capital city of Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta fits into the neoliberal context, producing competition between spaces and cities. These kinds of urban production and urban management do not reduce inequalities inside the urban area. Moreover, it contributes to strain land access. We can question the governance modes in that metropolitan context. This paper compares two areas and its stakeholders in different phases of the urban project. The aim is to describe the negotiation and the contestation according to several factors: the legal status of people and of the land, the size of the community involved, the principles of urban development. At local scale, the top down production of the city is less relevant. Urban governance practices highlight new power relations and negotiation. The emergence of informal governments is linked to contested land uses. Also, some daily quiet encroachments cohabit with official planning practices: it contributes to the production of inequalities and vulnerability inside the city. In Budidharma (North Jakarta), a household’s group helped by a NGO can negotiate with the owner (a developer company) and the local government to avoid their eviction. In Bintara (Bekasi), some residents resisted hardily against a residential high standing compound project because of unclear land use. They may be forced to leave this area very quickly. These two case studies question uses of ordinary citizen and of urban planners between individualization of social relations and collective mobilization.
format	article
author	Judicaëlle Dietrich
author_facet	Judicaëlle Dietrich
author_sort	Judicaëlle Dietrich
title	Contestation ou négociation à Jakarta ? Deux quartiers face aux projets urbains de la métropole
title_short	Contestation ou négociation à Jakarta ? Deux quartiers face aux projets urbains de la métropole
title_full	Contestation ou négociation à Jakarta ? Deux quartiers face aux projets urbains de la métropole
title_fullStr	Contestation ou négociation à Jakarta ? Deux quartiers face aux projets urbains de la métropole
title_full_unstemmed	Contestation ou négociation à Jakarta ? Deux quartiers face aux projets urbains de la métropole
title_sort	contestation ou négociation à jakarta ? deux quartiers face aux projets urbains de la métropole
publisher	Unité Mixte de Recherche 8504 Géographie-cités
publishDate	2015
url	https://doaj.org/article/d7db9c09cf4048e996e58cef04d57775
work_keys_str_mv	AT judicaelledietrich contestationounegociationajakartadeuxquartiersfaceauxprojetsurbainsdelametropole
_version_	1718396141072023552

Contestation ou négociation à Jakarta ? Deux quartiers face aux projets urbains de la métropole

Ejemplares similares