Mapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis
This essay conducts a bibliometric study on innovation research in organizations within the three levels (i.e., individual, work team, and organizational) by using CiteSpace software to analyze 6,354 academic articles from the year 2000 to 2020 in four aspects: temporal distribution of published pap...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d7e9c0e63dac468084682bd1e89ea82f |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d7e9c0e63dac468084682bd1e89ea82f |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d7e9c0e63dac468084682bd1e89ea82f2021-12-01T08:33:16ZMapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis1664-107810.3389/fpsyg.2021.750960https://doaj.org/article/d7e9c0e63dac468084682bd1e89ea82f2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.750960/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-1078This essay conducts a bibliometric study on innovation research in organizations within the three levels (i.e., individual, work team, and organizational) by using CiteSpace software to analyze 6,354 academic articles from the year 2000 to 2020 in four aspects: temporal distribution of published papers, scientific community (countries/regions/cited authors), intellectual structure (cited journals/cited references), and research hotspots. The research findings show that the total number and the growth rate of publications at the organizational level are far higher than the other two levels (individual and work team). The top three countries with the number of publications are United States, China, and United Kingdom. The top five highly cited authors are identified and listed from individual, work team, and organizational levels. Academy of Management Journal and Academy of Management Review are the top two highly cited journals at all three levels (i.e., individual, work team, and organizational levels). The most highly cited articles at the three levels are about topics of linking empowering leadership and employee creativity, team-level predictors of innovation at work, and organizational ambidexterity. The top three research hotspots are identified and listed from individual, work team, and organizational levels. These findings provide snapshots and comparisons of innovation research in management within the three levels (i.e., individual, work team, and organizational levels), which might be beneficial for researchers and scholars to understand and explore innovative behavior in organizations from a multilevel perspective.Renzhong PengJingshuang ChenWeiping WuFrontiers Media S.A.articleinnovationcreativityorganizationsbibliometric analysisCiteSpacePsychologyBF1-990ENFrontiers in Psychology, Vol 12 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
innovation creativity organizations bibliometric analysis CiteSpace Psychology BF1-990 |
spellingShingle |
innovation creativity organizations bibliometric analysis CiteSpace Psychology BF1-990 Renzhong Peng Jingshuang Chen Weiping Wu Mapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis |
description |
This essay conducts a bibliometric study on innovation research in organizations within the three levels (i.e., individual, work team, and organizational) by using CiteSpace software to analyze 6,354 academic articles from the year 2000 to 2020 in four aspects: temporal distribution of published papers, scientific community (countries/regions/cited authors), intellectual structure (cited journals/cited references), and research hotspots. The research findings show that the total number and the growth rate of publications at the organizational level are far higher than the other two levels (individual and work team). The top three countries with the number of publications are United States, China, and United Kingdom. The top five highly cited authors are identified and listed from individual, work team, and organizational levels. Academy of Management Journal and Academy of Management Review are the top two highly cited journals at all three levels (i.e., individual, work team, and organizational levels). The most highly cited articles at the three levels are about topics of linking empowering leadership and employee creativity, team-level predictors of innovation at work, and organizational ambidexterity. The top three research hotspots are identified and listed from individual, work team, and organizational levels. These findings provide snapshots and comparisons of innovation research in management within the three levels (i.e., individual, work team, and organizational levels), which might be beneficial for researchers and scholars to understand and explore innovative behavior in organizations from a multilevel perspective. |
format |
article |
author |
Renzhong Peng Jingshuang Chen Weiping Wu |
author_facet |
Renzhong Peng Jingshuang Chen Weiping Wu |
author_sort |
Renzhong Peng |
title |
Mapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis |
title_short |
Mapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis |
title_full |
Mapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Mapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis |
title_sort |
mapping innovation research in organizations: a bibliometric analysis |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d7e9c0e63dac468084682bd1e89ea82f |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT renzhongpeng mappinginnovationresearchinorganizationsabibliometricanalysis AT jingshuangchen mappinginnovationresearchinorganizationsabibliometricanalysis AT weipingwu mappinginnovationresearchinorganizationsabibliometricanalysis |
_version_ |
1718405383219838976 |