Mapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis

This essay conducts a bibliometric study on innovation research in organizations within the three levels (i.e., individual, work team, and organizational) by using CiteSpace software to analyze 6,354 academic articles from the year 2000 to 2020 in four aspects: temporal distribution of published pap...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Renzhong Peng, Jingshuang Chen, Weiping Wu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d7e9c0e63dac468084682bd1e89ea82f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d7e9c0e63dac468084682bd1e89ea82f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d7e9c0e63dac468084682bd1e89ea82f2021-12-01T08:33:16ZMapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis1664-107810.3389/fpsyg.2021.750960https://doaj.org/article/d7e9c0e63dac468084682bd1e89ea82f2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.750960/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-1078This essay conducts a bibliometric study on innovation research in organizations within the three levels (i.e., individual, work team, and organizational) by using CiteSpace software to analyze 6,354 academic articles from the year 2000 to 2020 in four aspects: temporal distribution of published papers, scientific community (countries/regions/cited authors), intellectual structure (cited journals/cited references), and research hotspots. The research findings show that the total number and the growth rate of publications at the organizational level are far higher than the other two levels (individual and work team). The top three countries with the number of publications are United States, China, and United Kingdom. The top five highly cited authors are identified and listed from individual, work team, and organizational levels. Academy of Management Journal and Academy of Management Review are the top two highly cited journals at all three levels (i.e., individual, work team, and organizational levels). The most highly cited articles at the three levels are about topics of linking empowering leadership and employee creativity, team-level predictors of innovation at work, and organizational ambidexterity. The top three research hotspots are identified and listed from individual, work team, and organizational levels. These findings provide snapshots and comparisons of innovation research in management within the three levels (i.e., individual, work team, and organizational levels), which might be beneficial for researchers and scholars to understand and explore innovative behavior in organizations from a multilevel perspective.Renzhong PengJingshuang ChenWeiping WuFrontiers Media S.A.articleinnovationcreativityorganizationsbibliometric analysisCiteSpacePsychologyBF1-990ENFrontiers in Psychology, Vol 12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic innovation
creativity
organizations
bibliometric analysis
CiteSpace
Psychology
BF1-990
spellingShingle innovation
creativity
organizations
bibliometric analysis
CiteSpace
Psychology
BF1-990
Renzhong Peng
Jingshuang Chen
Weiping Wu
Mapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis
description This essay conducts a bibliometric study on innovation research in organizations within the three levels (i.e., individual, work team, and organizational) by using CiteSpace software to analyze 6,354 academic articles from the year 2000 to 2020 in four aspects: temporal distribution of published papers, scientific community (countries/regions/cited authors), intellectual structure (cited journals/cited references), and research hotspots. The research findings show that the total number and the growth rate of publications at the organizational level are far higher than the other two levels (individual and work team). The top three countries with the number of publications are United States, China, and United Kingdom. The top five highly cited authors are identified and listed from individual, work team, and organizational levels. Academy of Management Journal and Academy of Management Review are the top two highly cited journals at all three levels (i.e., individual, work team, and organizational levels). The most highly cited articles at the three levels are about topics of linking empowering leadership and employee creativity, team-level predictors of innovation at work, and organizational ambidexterity. The top three research hotspots are identified and listed from individual, work team, and organizational levels. These findings provide snapshots and comparisons of innovation research in management within the three levels (i.e., individual, work team, and organizational levels), which might be beneficial for researchers and scholars to understand and explore innovative behavior in organizations from a multilevel perspective.
format article
author Renzhong Peng
Jingshuang Chen
Weiping Wu
author_facet Renzhong Peng
Jingshuang Chen
Weiping Wu
author_sort Renzhong Peng
title Mapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_short Mapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_full Mapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_fullStr Mapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Mapping Innovation Research in Organizations: A Bibliometric Analysis
title_sort mapping innovation research in organizations: a bibliometric analysis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d7e9c0e63dac468084682bd1e89ea82f
work_keys_str_mv AT renzhongpeng mappinginnovationresearchinorganizationsabibliometricanalysis
AT jingshuangchen mappinginnovationresearchinorganizationsabibliometricanalysis
AT weipingwu mappinginnovationresearchinorganizationsabibliometricanalysis
_version_ 1718405383219838976