An evaluation of multi-species empirical tree mortality algorithms for dynamic vegetation modelling

Abstract Tree mortality is key for projecting forest dynamics, but difficult to portray in dynamic vegetation models (DVMs). Empirical mortality algorithms (MAs) are often considered promising, but little is known about DVM robustness when employing MAs of various structures and origins for multiple...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timothy Thrippleton, Lisa Hülsmann, Maxime Cailleret, Harald Bugmann
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d80e48bdb373425abacc97ab427f46ba
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d80e48bdb373425abacc97ab427f46ba
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d80e48bdb373425abacc97ab427f46ba2021-12-02T18:09:03ZAn evaluation of multi-species empirical tree mortality algorithms for dynamic vegetation modelling10.1038/s41598-021-98880-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/d80e48bdb373425abacc97ab427f46ba2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98880-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Tree mortality is key for projecting forest dynamics, but difficult to portray in dynamic vegetation models (DVMs). Empirical mortality algorithms (MAs) are often considered promising, but little is known about DVM robustness when employing MAs of various structures and origins for multiple species. We analysed empirical MAs for a suite of European tree species within a consistent DVM framework under present and future climates in two climatically different study areas in Switzerland and evaluated their performance using empirical data from old-growth forests across Europe. DVM projections under present climate showed substantial variations when using alternative empirical MAs for the same species. Under climate change, DVM projections showed partly contrasting mortality responses for the same species. These opposing patterns were associated with MA structures (i.e. explanatory variables) and occurred independent of species ecological characteristics. When comparing simulated forest structure with data from old-growth forests, we found frequent overestimations of basal area, which can lead to flawed projections of carbon sequestration and other ecosystem services. While using empirical MAs in DVMs may appear promising, our results emphasize the importance of selecting them cautiously. We therefore synthesize our insights into a guideline for the appropriate use of empirical MAs in DVM applications.Timothy ThrippletonLisa HülsmannMaxime CailleretHarald BugmannNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Timothy Thrippleton
Lisa Hülsmann
Maxime Cailleret
Harald Bugmann
An evaluation of multi-species empirical tree mortality algorithms for dynamic vegetation modelling
description Abstract Tree mortality is key for projecting forest dynamics, but difficult to portray in dynamic vegetation models (DVMs). Empirical mortality algorithms (MAs) are often considered promising, but little is known about DVM robustness when employing MAs of various structures and origins for multiple species. We analysed empirical MAs for a suite of European tree species within a consistent DVM framework under present and future climates in two climatically different study areas in Switzerland and evaluated their performance using empirical data from old-growth forests across Europe. DVM projections under present climate showed substantial variations when using alternative empirical MAs for the same species. Under climate change, DVM projections showed partly contrasting mortality responses for the same species. These opposing patterns were associated with MA structures (i.e. explanatory variables) and occurred independent of species ecological characteristics. When comparing simulated forest structure with data from old-growth forests, we found frequent overestimations of basal area, which can lead to flawed projections of carbon sequestration and other ecosystem services. While using empirical MAs in DVMs may appear promising, our results emphasize the importance of selecting them cautiously. We therefore synthesize our insights into a guideline for the appropriate use of empirical MAs in DVM applications.
format article
author Timothy Thrippleton
Lisa Hülsmann
Maxime Cailleret
Harald Bugmann
author_facet Timothy Thrippleton
Lisa Hülsmann
Maxime Cailleret
Harald Bugmann
author_sort Timothy Thrippleton
title An evaluation of multi-species empirical tree mortality algorithms for dynamic vegetation modelling
title_short An evaluation of multi-species empirical tree mortality algorithms for dynamic vegetation modelling
title_full An evaluation of multi-species empirical tree mortality algorithms for dynamic vegetation modelling
title_fullStr An evaluation of multi-species empirical tree mortality algorithms for dynamic vegetation modelling
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of multi-species empirical tree mortality algorithms for dynamic vegetation modelling
title_sort evaluation of multi-species empirical tree mortality algorithms for dynamic vegetation modelling
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d80e48bdb373425abacc97ab427f46ba
work_keys_str_mv AT timothythrippleton anevaluationofmultispeciesempiricaltreemortalityalgorithmsfordynamicvegetationmodelling
AT lisahulsmann anevaluationofmultispeciesempiricaltreemortalityalgorithmsfordynamicvegetationmodelling
AT maximecailleret anevaluationofmultispeciesempiricaltreemortalityalgorithmsfordynamicvegetationmodelling
AT haraldbugmann anevaluationofmultispeciesempiricaltreemortalityalgorithmsfordynamicvegetationmodelling
AT timothythrippleton evaluationofmultispeciesempiricaltreemortalityalgorithmsfordynamicvegetationmodelling
AT lisahulsmann evaluationofmultispeciesempiricaltreemortalityalgorithmsfordynamicvegetationmodelling
AT maximecailleret evaluationofmultispeciesempiricaltreemortalityalgorithmsfordynamicvegetationmodelling
AT haraldbugmann evaluationofmultispeciesempiricaltreemortalityalgorithmsfordynamicvegetationmodelling
_version_ 1718378660184981504