Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean
Background: Short-term, primary care medical service trips (MSTs) frequently use inexpensive, portable point of care (POC) tests to guide diagnosis and treatment of patients in low-resource settings. However, the degree to which different POC tests are carried by organizations serving remote communi...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d83d372d5b6a496889c761a16e1a32ea |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d83d372d5b6a496889c761a16e1a32ea |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d83d372d5b6a496889c761a16e1a32ea2021-12-02T07:34:56ZPrevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean2214-999610.29024/aogh.2385https://doaj.org/article/d83d372d5b6a496889c761a16e1a32ea2018-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/2385https://doaj.org/toc/2214-9996Background: Short-term, primary care medical service trips (MSTs) frequently use inexpensive, portable point of care (POC) tests to guide diagnosis and treatment of patients in low-resource settings. However, the degree to which different POC tests are carried by organizations serving remote communities is currently unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of various POC tests used by MST-sending organizations operating in Latin America. Methods: We surveyed 166 organizations operating mobile MSTs in Latin America and the Caribbean on the types of POC tests carried on their brigades. Findings: Forty-eight organizations responded (response rate: 28.9%). The most commonly carried tests were glucometers (40/48; 83.3%), urine dipsticks (31/48; 77.1%), and urine pregnancy tests (32/48; 66.7%). Fewer groups carried hemoglobinometers (16/48; 33.3%), malaria diagnostic tests (18/48; 37.5%), tests for sexually transmitted infection (8/48; 16.7%), or portable ultrasound (19/48; 40.0%). Conclusions: These tests may be useful for field diagnosis, but clinicians should understand the performance limitations of each test compared to its gold standard. When combined with knowledge of local epidemiology, these exploratory results will be useful in resource planning, guidelines development for MSTs, and in establishing minimum recommendations for diagnostic resources that should be available on MSTs.Christopher DaintonNikki ShahCharlene H. ChuUbiquity PressarticleInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENAnnals of Global Health, Vol 84, Iss 4, Pp 736-742 (2018) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 |
spellingShingle |
Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 Christopher Dainton Nikki Shah Charlene H. Chu Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean |
description |
Background: Short-term, primary care medical service trips (MSTs) frequently use inexpensive, portable point of care (POC) tests to guide diagnosis and treatment of patients in low-resource settings. However, the degree to which different POC tests are carried by organizations serving remote communities is currently unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of various POC tests used by MST-sending organizations operating in Latin America. Methods: We surveyed 166 organizations operating mobile MSTs in Latin America and the Caribbean on the types of POC tests carried on their brigades. Findings: Forty-eight organizations responded (response rate: 28.9%). The most commonly carried tests were glucometers (40/48; 83.3%), urine dipsticks (31/48; 77.1%), and urine pregnancy tests (32/48; 66.7%). Fewer groups carried hemoglobinometers (16/48; 33.3%), malaria diagnostic tests (18/48; 37.5%), tests for sexually transmitted infection (8/48; 16.7%), or portable ultrasound (19/48; 40.0%). Conclusions: These tests may be useful for field diagnosis, but clinicians should understand the performance limitations of each test compared to its gold standard. When combined with knowledge of local epidemiology, these exploratory results will be useful in resource planning, guidelines development for MSTs, and in establishing minimum recommendations for diagnostic resources that should be available on MSTs. |
format |
article |
author |
Christopher Dainton Nikki Shah Charlene H. Chu |
author_facet |
Christopher Dainton Nikki Shah Charlene H. Chu |
author_sort |
Christopher Dainton |
title |
Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean |
title_short |
Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean |
title_full |
Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean |
title_fullStr |
Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean |
title_sort |
prevalence of portable point of care tests used on medical service trips in latin america and the caribbean |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d83d372d5b6a496889c761a16e1a32ea |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christopherdainton prevalenceofportablepointofcaretestsusedonmedicalservicetripsinlatinamericaandthecaribbean AT nikkishah prevalenceofportablepointofcaretestsusedonmedicalservicetripsinlatinamericaandthecaribbean AT charlenehchu prevalenceofportablepointofcaretestsusedonmedicalservicetripsinlatinamericaandthecaribbean |
_version_ |
1718399369546301440 |