Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean

Background: Short-term, primary care medical service trips (MSTs) frequently use inexpensive, portable point of care (POC) tests to guide diagnosis and treatment of patients in low-resource settings. However, the degree to which different POC tests are carried by organizations serving remote communi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christopher Dainton, Nikki Shah, Charlene H. Chu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d83d372d5b6a496889c761a16e1a32ea
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d83d372d5b6a496889c761a16e1a32ea
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d83d372d5b6a496889c761a16e1a32ea2021-12-02T07:34:56ZPrevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean2214-999610.29024/aogh.2385https://doaj.org/article/d83d372d5b6a496889c761a16e1a32ea2018-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/2385https://doaj.org/toc/2214-9996Background: Short-term, primary care medical service trips (MSTs) frequently use inexpensive, portable point of care (POC) tests to guide diagnosis and treatment of patients in low-resource settings. However, the degree to which different POC tests are carried by organizations serving remote communities is currently unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of various POC tests used by MST-sending organizations operating in Latin America. Methods: We surveyed 166 organizations operating mobile MSTs in Latin America and the Caribbean on the types of POC tests carried on their brigades. Findings: Forty-eight organizations responded (response rate: 28.9%). The most commonly carried tests were glucometers (40/48; 83.3%), urine dipsticks (31/48; 77.1%), and urine pregnancy tests (32/48; 66.7%). Fewer groups carried hemoglobinometers (16/48; 33.3%), malaria diagnostic tests (18/48; 37.5%), tests for sexually transmitted infection (8/48; 16.7%), or portable ultrasound (19/48; 40.0%). Conclusions: These tests may be useful for field diagnosis, but clinicians should understand the performance limitations of each test compared to its gold standard. When combined with knowledge of local epidemiology, these exploratory results will be useful in resource planning, guidelines development for MSTs, and in establishing minimum recommendations for diagnostic resources that should be available on MSTs.Christopher DaintonNikki ShahCharlene H. ChuUbiquity PressarticleInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENAnnals of Global Health, Vol 84, Iss 4, Pp 736-742 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Christopher Dainton
Nikki Shah
Charlene H. Chu
Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean
description Background: Short-term, primary care medical service trips (MSTs) frequently use inexpensive, portable point of care (POC) tests to guide diagnosis and treatment of patients in low-resource settings. However, the degree to which different POC tests are carried by organizations serving remote communities is currently unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of various POC tests used by MST-sending organizations operating in Latin America. Methods: We surveyed 166 organizations operating mobile MSTs in Latin America and the Caribbean on the types of POC tests carried on their brigades. Findings: Forty-eight organizations responded (response rate: 28.9%). The most commonly carried tests were glucometers (40/48; 83.3%), urine dipsticks (31/48; 77.1%), and urine pregnancy tests (32/48; 66.7%). Fewer groups carried hemoglobinometers (16/48; 33.3%), malaria diagnostic tests (18/48; 37.5%), tests for sexually transmitted infection (8/48; 16.7%), or portable ultrasound (19/48; 40.0%). Conclusions: These tests may be useful for field diagnosis, but clinicians should understand the performance limitations of each test compared to its gold standard. When combined with knowledge of local epidemiology, these exploratory results will be useful in resource planning, guidelines development for MSTs, and in establishing minimum recommendations for diagnostic resources that should be available on MSTs.
format article
author Christopher Dainton
Nikki Shah
Charlene H. Chu
author_facet Christopher Dainton
Nikki Shah
Charlene H. Chu
author_sort Christopher Dainton
title Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean
title_short Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean
title_full Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean
title_fullStr Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Portable Point of Care Tests Used on Medical Service Trips in Latin America and the Caribbean
title_sort prevalence of portable point of care tests used on medical service trips in latin america and the caribbean
publisher Ubiquity Press
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/d83d372d5b6a496889c761a16e1a32ea
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherdainton prevalenceofportablepointofcaretestsusedonmedicalservicetripsinlatinamericaandthecaribbean
AT nikkishah prevalenceofportablepointofcaretestsusedonmedicalservicetripsinlatinamericaandthecaribbean
AT charlenehchu prevalenceofportablepointofcaretestsusedonmedicalservicetripsinlatinamericaandthecaribbean
_version_ 1718399369546301440