Parasismique, oser éprouver l’acceptabilité sociale

Coping with natural hazards induces a social re-organization. Threat acceptance and the acceptability of technical solutions to reduce seismic vulnerability are linked to knowledge of the hazard and the willingness of the constraint. In France, the importance of state managed defense about natural d...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Stéphane Cartier, Cloé Vallette
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	FR
Publicado:	Éditions en environnement VertigO 2016
Materias:	acceptability anti-seismic building codes professional organization risk perception natural hazards Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d83f929f250c428fba5f66eb0bf4b345
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d83f929f250c428fba5f66eb0bf4b345
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d83f929f250c428fba5f66eb0bf4b3452021-12-02T09:59:15ZParasismique, oser éprouver l’acceptabilité sociale1492-844210.4000/vertigo.17115https://doaj.org/article/d83f929f250c428fba5f66eb0bf4b3452016-05-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/17115https://doaj.org/toc/1492-8442Coping with natural hazards induces a social re-organization. Threat acceptance and the acceptability of technical solutions to reduce seismic vulnerability are linked to knowledge of the hazard and the willingness of the constraint. In France, the importance of state managed defense about natural disasters skips more interrogation about social acceptance of it. Anti-seismic technologies in housing impose a zoning of seismic hazard to graduate architectural constraints according to the probability of shakes. The new probabilistic zoning gives opportunity to examine the spirit and the scientific matrix to understand the choices of experts and public authorities. In opposition, the REVDOU sociological survey developed in 2011 at Salon de Provence, Albertville, Mulhouse and Tarbes cities about the engagement of owners, builders and administrations in anti-seismic technologies shows the variation of risk acceptability according to the local social consensus about acceptable organization and inacceptable threat. These four situations of moderate seismic exposition illustrate how some changes in the seismic zonation and building codes oblige local actors to appreciate the modalities of common control and the definition of the solidity of buildings. The study shows the gap between probabilistic concepts of hazard incorporated in the rule and local acceptability of seismic threat and professional constraints to reduce some invisible threat.Stéphane CartierCloé ValletteÉditions en environnement VertigOarticleacceptabilityanti-seismic buildingcodesprofessional organizationrisk perceptionnatural hazardsEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350FRVertigO, Vol 16, Iss 1 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	FR
topic	acceptability anti-seismic building codes professional organization risk perception natural hazards Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	acceptability anti-seismic building codes professional organization risk perception natural hazards Environmental sciences GE1-350 Stéphane Cartier Cloé Vallette Parasismique, oser éprouver l’acceptabilité sociale
description	Coping with natural hazards induces a social re-organization. Threat acceptance and the acceptability of technical solutions to reduce seismic vulnerability are linked to knowledge of the hazard and the willingness of the constraint. In France, the importance of state managed defense about natural disasters skips more interrogation about social acceptance of it. Anti-seismic technologies in housing impose a zoning of seismic hazard to graduate architectural constraints according to the probability of shakes. The new probabilistic zoning gives opportunity to examine the spirit and the scientific matrix to understand the choices of experts and public authorities. In opposition, the REVDOU sociological survey developed in 2011 at Salon de Provence, Albertville, Mulhouse and Tarbes cities about the engagement of owners, builders and administrations in anti-seismic technologies shows the variation of risk acceptability according to the local social consensus about acceptable organization and inacceptable threat. These four situations of moderate seismic exposition illustrate how some changes in the seismic zonation and building codes oblige local actors to appreciate the modalities of common control and the definition of the solidity of buildings. The study shows the gap between probabilistic concepts of hazard incorporated in the rule and local acceptability of seismic threat and professional constraints to reduce some invisible threat.
format	article
author	Stéphane Cartier Cloé Vallette
author_facet	Stéphane Cartier Cloé Vallette
author_sort	Stéphane Cartier
title	Parasismique, oser éprouver l’acceptabilité sociale
title_short	Parasismique, oser éprouver l’acceptabilité sociale
title_full	Parasismique, oser éprouver l’acceptabilité sociale
title_fullStr	Parasismique, oser éprouver l’acceptabilité sociale
title_full_unstemmed	Parasismique, oser éprouver l’acceptabilité sociale
title_sort	parasismique, oser éprouver l’acceptabilité sociale
publisher	Éditions en environnement VertigO
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/d83f929f250c428fba5f66eb0bf4b345
work_keys_str_mv	AT stephanecartier parasismiqueosereprouverlacceptabilitesociale AT cloevallette parasismiqueosereprouverlacceptabilitesociale
_version_	1718397911897735168

Parasismique, oser éprouver l’acceptabilité sociale

Ejemplares similares