Analyzing learning during Peer Instruction dialogues: A resource activation framework

Peer Instruction (PI) is an evidence based pedagogy commonly used in undergraduate physics instruction. When asked questions designed to test conceptual understanding, it has been observed that the proportion of students choosing the correct answer increases following peer discussion; however, relat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anna K. Wood, Ross K. Galloway, Judy Hardy, Christine M. Sinclair
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Physical Society 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d864cc3c801b435585d11b8924727fb5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d864cc3c801b435585d11b8924727fb5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d864cc3c801b435585d11b8924727fb52021-12-02T11:51:46ZAnalyzing learning during Peer Instruction dialogues: A resource activation framework10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.0201071554-9178https://doaj.org/article/d864cc3c801b435585d11b8924727fb52014-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020107http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020107https://doaj.org/toc/1554-9178Peer Instruction (PI) is an evidence based pedagogy commonly used in undergraduate physics instruction. When asked questions designed to test conceptual understanding, it has been observed that the proportion of students choosing the correct answer increases following peer discussion; however, relatively little is known about what takes place during these discussions or how they are beneficial to the processes of learning physics [M. C. James and S. Willoughby, Am. J. Phys. 79, 123 (2011)]. In this paper a framework for analyzing PI discussions developed through the lens of the “resources model” [D. Hammer, Am. J. Phys. 64, 1316 (1996); D. Hammer et al., Information Age Publishing (2005)] is proposed. A central hypothesis for this framework is that the dialogue with peers plays a crucial role in activating appropriate cognitive resources, enabling the students to see the problem differently, and therefore to answer the questions correctly. This framework is used to gain greater insights into the PI discussions of first year undergraduate physics students at the University of Edinburgh, UK, which were recorded using Livescribe Smartpens. Analysis of the dialogues revealed three different types of resource activation corresponding to increasing cognitive grain size. These were activation of knowledge elements, activation of linkages between knowledge elements, and activation of control structures (epistemic games and epistemological frames). Three case studies are examined to illustrate the role that peer dialogue plays in the activation of these cognitive resources in a PI session. The implications for pedagogical practice are discussed.Anna K. WoodRoss K. GallowayJudy HardyChristine M. SinclairAmerican Physical SocietyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691PhysicsQC1-999ENPhysical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research, Vol 10, Iss 2, p 020107 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
Anna K. Wood
Ross K. Galloway
Judy Hardy
Christine M. Sinclair
Analyzing learning during Peer Instruction dialogues: A resource activation framework
description Peer Instruction (PI) is an evidence based pedagogy commonly used in undergraduate physics instruction. When asked questions designed to test conceptual understanding, it has been observed that the proportion of students choosing the correct answer increases following peer discussion; however, relatively little is known about what takes place during these discussions or how they are beneficial to the processes of learning physics [M. C. James and S. Willoughby, Am. J. Phys. 79, 123 (2011)]. In this paper a framework for analyzing PI discussions developed through the lens of the “resources model” [D. Hammer, Am. J. Phys. 64, 1316 (1996); D. Hammer et al., Information Age Publishing (2005)] is proposed. A central hypothesis for this framework is that the dialogue with peers plays a crucial role in activating appropriate cognitive resources, enabling the students to see the problem differently, and therefore to answer the questions correctly. This framework is used to gain greater insights into the PI discussions of first year undergraduate physics students at the University of Edinburgh, UK, which were recorded using Livescribe Smartpens. Analysis of the dialogues revealed three different types of resource activation corresponding to increasing cognitive grain size. These were activation of knowledge elements, activation of linkages between knowledge elements, and activation of control structures (epistemic games and epistemological frames). Three case studies are examined to illustrate the role that peer dialogue plays in the activation of these cognitive resources in a PI session. The implications for pedagogical practice are discussed.
format article
author Anna K. Wood
Ross K. Galloway
Judy Hardy
Christine M. Sinclair
author_facet Anna K. Wood
Ross K. Galloway
Judy Hardy
Christine M. Sinclair
author_sort Anna K. Wood
title Analyzing learning during Peer Instruction dialogues: A resource activation framework
title_short Analyzing learning during Peer Instruction dialogues: A resource activation framework
title_full Analyzing learning during Peer Instruction dialogues: A resource activation framework
title_fullStr Analyzing learning during Peer Instruction dialogues: A resource activation framework
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing learning during Peer Instruction dialogues: A resource activation framework
title_sort analyzing learning during peer instruction dialogues: a resource activation framework
publisher American Physical Society
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/d864cc3c801b435585d11b8924727fb5
work_keys_str_mv AT annakwood analyzinglearningduringpeerinstructiondialoguesaresourceactivationframework
AT rosskgalloway analyzinglearningduringpeerinstructiondialoguesaresourceactivationframework
AT judyhardy analyzinglearningduringpeerinstructiondialoguesaresourceactivationframework
AT christinemsinclair analyzinglearningduringpeerinstructiondialoguesaresourceactivationframework
_version_ 1718395134106664960