Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
Abstract Preventing biofilm-related risks such as gingivitis and white spot lesions during orthodontic treatments is very challenging. The cleaning efficiencies of AirFloss Ultra and I-Prox P sulcus brushes were evaluated using an orthodontic phantom model. After attaching brackets onto black-coated...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d8862f40deb44f6c83e7d10b32b9a063 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d8862f40deb44f6c83e7d10b32b9a063 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d8862f40deb44f6c83e7d10b32b9a0632021-12-02T13:48:41ZComparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model10.1038/s41598-021-81603-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/d8862f40deb44f6c83e7d10b32b9a0632021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81603-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Preventing biofilm-related risks such as gingivitis and white spot lesions during orthodontic treatments is very challenging. The cleaning efficiencies of AirFloss Ultra and I-Prox P sulcus brushes were evaluated using an orthodontic phantom model. After attaching brackets onto black-coated maxillary KaVo teeth, a plaque substitute was applied. The evaluated tooth surfaces were divided into two areas. Cleaning was performed with an AirFloss Ultra with two (A-2) or four (A-4) sprays or an I-Prox P for two (I-2) or four (I-4) seconds. Images before and after cleaning were digitally subtracted, and the percentage of fully cleaned surfaces was determined (Adobe Photoshop CS5, ImageJ). Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA and post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction (SPSS 25, p < 0.05). The mean values of total cleaning efficacy were 26.87% for I-2, 43.73% for I-4, 34.93%, for A-2 and 56.78% for A-4. The efficacy was significantly higher for A-4 than for A-2, I-4, and I-2. There were significant differences between the four groups. Repeated cleaning led to an improved result. Within the study limitations, the AirFloss Ultra with four sprays proved to be more efficient than the sulcus brush I-Prox P for cleaning.Hanna BoesSören BrüstleGholamreza DaneshStefan ZimmerMozhgan BizhangNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Hanna Boes Sören Brüstle Gholamreza Danesh Stefan Zimmer Mozhgan Bizhang Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model |
description |
Abstract Preventing biofilm-related risks such as gingivitis and white spot lesions during orthodontic treatments is very challenging. The cleaning efficiencies of AirFloss Ultra and I-Prox P sulcus brushes were evaluated using an orthodontic phantom model. After attaching brackets onto black-coated maxillary KaVo teeth, a plaque substitute was applied. The evaluated tooth surfaces were divided into two areas. Cleaning was performed with an AirFloss Ultra with two (A-2) or four (A-4) sprays or an I-Prox P for two (I-2) or four (I-4) seconds. Images before and after cleaning were digitally subtracted, and the percentage of fully cleaned surfaces was determined (Adobe Photoshop CS5, ImageJ). Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA and post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction (SPSS 25, p < 0.05). The mean values of total cleaning efficacy were 26.87% for I-2, 43.73% for I-4, 34.93%, for A-2 and 56.78% for A-4. The efficacy was significantly higher for A-4 than for A-2, I-4, and I-2. There were significant differences between the four groups. Repeated cleaning led to an improved result. Within the study limitations, the AirFloss Ultra with four sprays proved to be more efficient than the sulcus brush I-Prox P for cleaning. |
format |
article |
author |
Hanna Boes Sören Brüstle Gholamreza Danesh Stefan Zimmer Mozhgan Bizhang |
author_facet |
Hanna Boes Sören Brüstle Gholamreza Danesh Stefan Zimmer Mozhgan Bizhang |
author_sort |
Hanna Boes |
title |
Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model |
title_short |
Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model |
title_full |
Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model |
title_fullStr |
Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model |
title_sort |
comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of airfloss ultra and i-prox sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d8862f40deb44f6c83e7d10b32b9a063 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hannaboes comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel AT sorenbrustle comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel AT gholamrezadanesh comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel AT stefanzimmer comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel AT mozhganbizhang comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel |
_version_ |
1718392467822215168 |