Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model

Abstract Preventing biofilm-related risks such as gingivitis and white spot lesions during orthodontic treatments is very challenging. The cleaning efficiencies of AirFloss Ultra and I-Prox P sulcus brushes were evaluated using an orthodontic phantom model. After attaching brackets onto black-coated...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanna Boes, Sören Brüstle, Gholamreza Danesh, Stefan Zimmer, Mozhgan Bizhang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d8862f40deb44f6c83e7d10b32b9a063
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d8862f40deb44f6c83e7d10b32b9a063
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d8862f40deb44f6c83e7d10b32b9a0632021-12-02T13:48:41ZComparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model10.1038/s41598-021-81603-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/d8862f40deb44f6c83e7d10b32b9a0632021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81603-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Preventing biofilm-related risks such as gingivitis and white spot lesions during orthodontic treatments is very challenging. The cleaning efficiencies of AirFloss Ultra and I-Prox P sulcus brushes were evaluated using an orthodontic phantom model. After attaching brackets onto black-coated maxillary KaVo teeth, a plaque substitute was applied. The evaluated tooth surfaces were divided into two areas. Cleaning was performed with an AirFloss Ultra with two (A-2) or four (A-4) sprays or an I-Prox P for two (I-2) or four (I-4) seconds. Images before and after cleaning were digitally subtracted, and the percentage of fully cleaned surfaces was determined (Adobe Photoshop CS5, ImageJ). Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA and post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction (SPSS 25, p < 0.05). The mean values of total cleaning efficacy were 26.87% for I-2, 43.73% for I-4, 34.93%, for A-2 and 56.78% for A-4. The efficacy was significantly higher for A-4 than for A-2, I-4, and I-2. There were significant differences between the four groups. Repeated cleaning led to an improved result. Within the study limitations, the AirFloss Ultra with four sprays proved to be more efficient than the sulcus brush I-Prox P for cleaning.Hanna BoesSören BrüstleGholamreza DaneshStefan ZimmerMozhgan BizhangNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Hanna Boes
Sören Brüstle
Gholamreza Danesh
Stefan Zimmer
Mozhgan Bizhang
Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
description Abstract Preventing biofilm-related risks such as gingivitis and white spot lesions during orthodontic treatments is very challenging. The cleaning efficiencies of AirFloss Ultra and I-Prox P sulcus brushes were evaluated using an orthodontic phantom model. After attaching brackets onto black-coated maxillary KaVo teeth, a plaque substitute was applied. The evaluated tooth surfaces were divided into two areas. Cleaning was performed with an AirFloss Ultra with two (A-2) or four (A-4) sprays or an I-Prox P for two (I-2) or four (I-4) seconds. Images before and after cleaning were digitally subtracted, and the percentage of fully cleaned surfaces was determined (Adobe Photoshop CS5, ImageJ). Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA and post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction (SPSS 25, p < 0.05). The mean values of total cleaning efficacy were 26.87% for I-2, 43.73% for I-4, 34.93%, for A-2 and 56.78% for A-4. The efficacy was significantly higher for A-4 than for A-2, I-4, and I-2. There were significant differences between the four groups. Repeated cleaning led to an improved result. Within the study limitations, the AirFloss Ultra with four sprays proved to be more efficient than the sulcus brush I-Prox P for cleaning.
format article
author Hanna Boes
Sören Brüstle
Gholamreza Danesh
Stefan Zimmer
Mozhgan Bizhang
author_facet Hanna Boes
Sören Brüstle
Gholamreza Danesh
Stefan Zimmer
Mozhgan Bizhang
author_sort Hanna Boes
title Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
title_short Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
title_full Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
title_fullStr Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
title_full_unstemmed Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
title_sort comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of airfloss ultra and i-prox sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d8862f40deb44f6c83e7d10b32b9a063
work_keys_str_mv AT hannaboes comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel
AT sorenbrustle comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel
AT gholamrezadanesh comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel
AT stefanzimmer comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel
AT mozhganbizhang comparativeinvitrostudyofthecleaningefficacyofairflossultraandiproxsulcusbrushesinanorthodonticphantommodel
_version_ 1718392467822215168