Intellectual Structure Of Ongoing Studies on Business Schools

We examined the extant research on Business Schools (B-Schools) in an attempt to understand the intellectual structural influences in mainstream research, as well as the evolution and trends in research. Through a bibliometric study of co-citation and bibliographic coupling, supported by factor and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Isabel Cristina Scafuto, Fernando Serra, Luiz Guerrazzi, Emerson Maccari
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN PT
Publicado:	FUCAPE Business School 2020
Materias:	business schools relevance bibliometrics business schools strategy Business HF5001-6182
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d88a3f182e44413b8f1a07318b1cc874
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d88a3f182e44413b8f1a07318b1cc874
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d88a3f182e44413b8f1a07318b1cc8742021-11-11T15:48:08ZIntellectual Structure Of Ongoing Studies on Business Schools1807-734X10.15728/bbr.2020.17.4.6https://doaj.org/article/d88a3f182e44413b8f1a07318b1cc8742020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=123064005006https://doaj.org/toc/1807-734XWe examined the extant research on Business Schools (B-Schools) in an attempt to understand the intellectual structural influences in mainstream research, as well as the evolution and trends in research. Through a bibliometric study of co-citation and bibliographic coupling, supported by factor and network analyses of a sample of 493 articles, we examined 76 selected articles and their references. The results indicate that critiques of B-Schools influenced mainstream works. We found three primary sources of criticism at the intellectual level: Theory and Practice Gap, Social Relevance, and Curricula and Practice. The mainstream works identified six different topics: B-School Relevance, Teaching Relevance, Relevance to Practice, Curricula Relevance, B-School Evolution, and Influence, and Reputation. The longitudinal analysis identified four trends: Relevance to Practice, Social Relevance, Academic-Practitioner Divide, and Teaching Relevance. Through our bibliometric research, we contribute to the B-Schools research in two ways. It enabled the identification of works and themes that influenced reflections on B-Schools, as they influenced the ongoing research, and consequently, the research trends. Furthermore, the results serve as possible orientations for B-School managers.Isabel Cristina ScafutoFernando SerraLuiz GuerrazziEmerson MaccariFUCAPE Business Schoolarticlebusiness schools relevancebibliometricsbusiness schools strategyBusinessHF5001-6182ENPTBBR: Brazilian Business Review, Vol 17, Iss 4, Pp 458-487 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN PT
topic	business schools relevance bibliometrics business schools strategy Business HF5001-6182
spellingShingle	business schools relevance bibliometrics business schools strategy Business HF5001-6182 Isabel Cristina Scafuto Fernando Serra Luiz Guerrazzi Emerson Maccari Intellectual Structure Of Ongoing Studies on Business Schools
description	We examined the extant research on Business Schools (B-Schools) in an attempt to understand the intellectual structural influences in mainstream research, as well as the evolution and trends in research. Through a bibliometric study of co-citation and bibliographic coupling, supported by factor and network analyses of a sample of 493 articles, we examined 76 selected articles and their references. The results indicate that critiques of B-Schools influenced mainstream works. We found three primary sources of criticism at the intellectual level: Theory and Practice Gap, Social Relevance, and Curricula and Practice. The mainstream works identified six different topics: B-School Relevance, Teaching Relevance, Relevance to Practice, Curricula Relevance, B-School Evolution, and Influence, and Reputation. The longitudinal analysis identified four trends: Relevance to Practice, Social Relevance, Academic-Practitioner Divide, and Teaching Relevance. Through our bibliometric research, we contribute to the B-Schools research in two ways. It enabled the identification of works and themes that influenced reflections on B-Schools, as they influenced the ongoing research, and consequently, the research trends. Furthermore, the results serve as possible orientations for B-School managers.
format	article
author	Isabel Cristina Scafuto Fernando Serra Luiz Guerrazzi Emerson Maccari
author_facet	Isabel Cristina Scafuto Fernando Serra Luiz Guerrazzi Emerson Maccari
author_sort	Isabel Cristina Scafuto
title	Intellectual Structure Of Ongoing Studies on Business Schools
title_short	Intellectual Structure Of Ongoing Studies on Business Schools
title_full	Intellectual Structure Of Ongoing Studies on Business Schools
title_fullStr	Intellectual Structure Of Ongoing Studies on Business Schools
title_full_unstemmed	Intellectual Structure Of Ongoing Studies on Business Schools
title_sort	intellectual structure of ongoing studies on business schools
publisher	FUCAPE Business School
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/d88a3f182e44413b8f1a07318b1cc874
work_keys_str_mv	AT isabelcristinascafuto intellectualstructureofongoingstudiesonbusinessschools AT fernandoserra intellectualstructureofongoingstudiesonbusinessschools AT luizguerrazzi intellectualstructureofongoingstudiesonbusinessschools AT emersonmaccari intellectualstructureofongoingstudiesonbusinessschools
_version_	1718433924118478848

Intellectual Structure Of Ongoing Studies on Business Schools

Ejemplares similares