Hvordan analysere sociale differentieringer?

Hvordan analysere sociale differentieringer?

The current Danish reception of the concept of intersectionality has largely been of a poststructuralist bend. However, the history of the concept is not necessarily as tightly related to poststructuralist theory as often assumed. Although the contributions produced by this reception must be recogni...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sune Qvotrup Jensen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DA
EN
NB
SV
Publicado: The Royal Danish Library 2006
Materias:
Social Sciences
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d88ab6f8904e40c6b26e88b28d085fb8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d88ab6f8904e40c6b26e88b28d085fb8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d88ab6f8904e40c6b26e88b28d085fb82021-12-01T00:08:57ZHvordan analysere sociale differentieringer?10.7146/kkf.v0i2-3.280872245-6937https://doaj.org/article/d88ab6f8904e40c6b26e88b28d085fb82006-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://tidsskrift.dk/KKF/article/view/28087https://doaj.org/toc/2245-6937The current Danish reception of the concept of intersectionality has largely been of a poststructuralist bend. However, the history of the concept is not necessarily as tightly related to poststructuralist theory as often assumed. Although the contributions produced by this reception must be recognised, the poststructuralist version of intersectionality is problematic from a specific sociological position. When social categories are presented as something people do, the reality of social differentiation is downplayed. Poststructuralist thinking rests on an inadequate conception of the material, as this form of thought tends to theorize this as another type of discourse or as a consequence of discourse. It furthermore tends to homogenise the logics underlying different forms of social differentiation. These points are illustrated by the works of Bourgeois and Wacquant where socio-cultural interpretations are transformed by changes on a material level.Sune Qvotrup JensenThe Royal Danish LibraryarticleSocial SciencesHDAENNBSVKvinder, Køn & Forskning, Iss 2-3 (2006)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DA
EN
NB
SV
topic Social Sciences
H
spellingShingle Social Sciences
H
Sune Qvotrup Jensen
Hvordan analysere sociale differentieringer?
description The current Danish reception of the concept of intersectionality has largely been of a poststructuralist bend. However, the history of the concept is not necessarily as tightly related to poststructuralist theory as often assumed. Although the contributions produced by this reception must be recognised, the poststructuralist version of intersectionality is problematic from a specific sociological position. When social categories are presented as something people do, the reality of social differentiation is downplayed. Poststructuralist thinking rests on an inadequate conception of the material, as this form of thought tends to theorize this as another type of discourse or as a consequence of discourse. It furthermore tends to homogenise the logics underlying different forms of social differentiation. These points are illustrated by the works of Bourgeois and Wacquant where socio-cultural interpretations are transformed by changes on a material level.
format article
author Sune Qvotrup Jensen
author_facet Sune Qvotrup Jensen
author_sort Sune Qvotrup Jensen
title Hvordan analysere sociale differentieringer?
title_short Hvordan analysere sociale differentieringer?
title_full Hvordan analysere sociale differentieringer?
title_fullStr Hvordan analysere sociale differentieringer?
title_full_unstemmed Hvordan analysere sociale differentieringer?
title_sort hvordan analysere sociale differentieringer?
publisher The Royal Danish Library
publishDate 2006
url https://doaj.org/article/d88ab6f8904e40c6b26e88b28d085fb8
work_keys_str_mv AT suneqvotrupjensen hvordananalyseresocialedifferentieringer
_version_ 1718406109976330240

Ejemplares similares