Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers

The peer review process is essential for quality checks and validation of journal submissions. Although it has some limitations, including manipulations and biased and unfair evaluations, there is no other alternative to the system. Several peer review models are now practised, with public review be...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Olena Zimba, Armen Gasparyan
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Termedia Publishing House 2021
Materias:	research peer review publishing periodicals as topic publication ethics rheumatology. Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d89824abc34a4d3c95b7a721150548f1
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d89824abc34a4d3c95b7a721150548f1
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d89824abc34a4d3c95b7a721150548f12021-12-02T18:55:17ZPeer review guidance: a primer for researchers0034-62332084-983410.5114/reum.2021.102709https://doaj.org/article/d89824abc34a4d3c95b7a721150548f12021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.termedia.pl/Peer-review-guidance-a-primer-for-researchers,18,43000,1,1.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/0034-6233https://doaj.org/toc/2084-9834The peer review process is essential for quality checks and validation of journal submissions. Although it has some limitations, including manipulations and biased and unfair evaluations, there is no other alternative to the system. Several peer review models are now practised, with public review being the most appropriate in view of the open science movement. Constructive reviewer comments are increasingly recognised as scholarly contributions which should meet certain ethics and reporting standards. The Publons platform, which is now part of the Web of Science Group (Clarivate Analytics), credits validated reviewer accomplishments and serves as an instrument for selecting and promoting the best reviewers. All authors with relevant profiles may act as reviewers. Adherence to research reporting standards and access to bibliographic databases are recommended to help reviewers draft evidence-based and detailed comments.Olena ZimbaArmen GasparyanTermedia Publishing Housearticleresearch peer review publishing periodicals as topic publication ethics rheumatology.MedicineRENRheumatology, Vol 59, Iss 1, Pp 3-8 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	research peer review publishing periodicals as topic publication ethics rheumatology. Medicine R
spellingShingle	research peer review publishing periodicals as topic publication ethics rheumatology. Medicine R Olena Zimba Armen Gasparyan Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers
description	The peer review process is essential for quality checks and validation of journal submissions. Although it has some limitations, including manipulations and biased and unfair evaluations, there is no other alternative to the system. Several peer review models are now practised, with public review being the most appropriate in view of the open science movement. Constructive reviewer comments are increasingly recognised as scholarly contributions which should meet certain ethics and reporting standards. The Publons platform, which is now part of the Web of Science Group (Clarivate Analytics), credits validated reviewer accomplishments and serves as an instrument for selecting and promoting the best reviewers. All authors with relevant profiles may act as reviewers. Adherence to research reporting standards and access to bibliographic databases are recommended to help reviewers draft evidence-based and detailed comments.
format	article
author	Olena Zimba Armen Gasparyan
author_facet	Olena Zimba Armen Gasparyan
author_sort	Olena Zimba
title	Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers
title_short	Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers
title_full	Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers
title_fullStr	Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers
title_full_unstemmed	Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers
title_sort	peer review guidance: a primer for researchers
publisher	Termedia Publishing House
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/d89824abc34a4d3c95b7a721150548f1
work_keys_str_mv	AT olenazimba peerreviewguidanceaprimerforresearchers AT armengasparyan peerreviewguidanceaprimerforresearchers
_version_	1718377297459806208

Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers

Ejemplares similares