Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol

Introduction Primary healthcare nurse practitioners (PHCNPs) practice in a wide range of clinical settings and with diverse patient populations. Several systematic reviews have examined outcomes of PHCNP roles. However, there is a lack of consistency in the definitions used for the PHCNP role across...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Maud-Christine Chouinard, Eric Nguemeleu Tchouaket, Kelley Kilpatrick, Isabelle Savard, Naima Bouabdillah, Julie Houle, Geneviève St-Louis, Mira Jabbour, Renee Atallah
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:	Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d8ba7e6d646a41618fa83f94f2904f02
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d8ba7e6d646a41618fa83f94f2904f02
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d8ba7e6d646a41618fa83f94f2904f022021-11-19T15:30:04ZIdentifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol10.1136/bmjopen-2020-0432132044-6055https://doaj.org/article/d8ba7e6d646a41618fa83f94f2904f022021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/1/e043213.fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2044-6055Introduction Primary healthcare nurse practitioners (PHCNPs) practice in a wide range of clinical settings and with diverse patient populations. Several systematic reviews have examined outcomes of PHCNP roles. However, there is a lack of consistency in the definitions used for the PHCNP role across the reviews. The identification of indicators sensitive to PHCNP practice from the perspective of patients, providers and the healthcare system will allow researchers, clinicians and decision-makers to understand how these providers contribute to outcomes of care.Methods and analysis A review of systematic reviews is proposed to describe the current state of knowledge about indicators sensitive to PHCNP practice using recognised role definitions. Outcomes of interest include any outcome indicator measuring the effectiveness of PHCNPs. We will limit our search to 2010 onwards to capture the most up-to-date trends. The following electronic databases will be searched: Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews and Controlled Trials Register, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, EMBASE, Global Health, Health Economics Evaluation Database, Health Evidence, HealthStar, Health Systems Evidence, Joanna Briggs Institute, Medline, PDQ-Evidence, PubMed and Web of Science. The search strategies will be reviewed by an academic librarian. Reference lists of all relevant publications will be reviewed. Grey literature will be searched from 2010 onwards, and will include: CADTH Information Services, CADTH’s Grey Matters tool, OpenGrey, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ProQuest Dissertation and Theses and WHO. The PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews will be searched to identify registered review protocols. The review protocol was developed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols recommendations. A narrative synthesis will be used to summarise study findings.Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required for the study. The data used in the study will be abstracted from published systematic reviews. Dissemination strategies will include peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and presentations to key stakeholders.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020198182.Maud-Christine ChouinardEric Nguemeleu TchouaketKelley KilpatrickIsabelle SavardNaima BouabdillahJulie HouleGeneviève St-LouisMira JabbourRenee AtallahBMJ Publishing GrouparticleMedicineRENBMJ Open, Vol 11, Iss 1 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R
spellingShingle	Medicine R Maud-Christine Chouinard Eric Nguemeleu Tchouaket Kelley Kilpatrick Isabelle Savard Naima Bouabdillah Julie Houle Geneviève St-Louis Mira Jabbour Renee Atallah Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol
description	Introduction Primary healthcare nurse practitioners (PHCNPs) practice in a wide range of clinical settings and with diverse patient populations. Several systematic reviews have examined outcomes of PHCNP roles. However, there is a lack of consistency in the definitions used for the PHCNP role across the reviews. The identification of indicators sensitive to PHCNP practice from the perspective of patients, providers and the healthcare system will allow researchers, clinicians and decision-makers to understand how these providers contribute to outcomes of care.Methods and analysis A review of systematic reviews is proposed to describe the current state of knowledge about indicators sensitive to PHCNP practice using recognised role definitions. Outcomes of interest include any outcome indicator measuring the effectiveness of PHCNPs. We will limit our search to 2010 onwards to capture the most up-to-date trends. The following electronic databases will be searched: Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews and Controlled Trials Register, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, EMBASE, Global Health, Health Economics Evaluation Database, Health Evidence, HealthStar, Health Systems Evidence, Joanna Briggs Institute, Medline, PDQ-Evidence, PubMed and Web of Science. The search strategies will be reviewed by an academic librarian. Reference lists of all relevant publications will be reviewed. Grey literature will be searched from 2010 onwards, and will include: CADTH Information Services, CADTH’s Grey Matters tool, OpenGrey, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ProQuest Dissertation and Theses and WHO. The PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews will be searched to identify registered review protocols. The review protocol was developed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols recommendations. A narrative synthesis will be used to summarise study findings.Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required for the study. The data used in the study will be abstracted from published systematic reviews. Dissemination strategies will include peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and presentations to key stakeholders.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020198182.
format	article
author	Maud-Christine Chouinard Eric Nguemeleu Tchouaket Kelley Kilpatrick Isabelle Savard Naima Bouabdillah Julie Houle Geneviève St-Louis Mira Jabbour Renee Atallah
author_facet	Maud-Christine Chouinard Eric Nguemeleu Tchouaket Kelley Kilpatrick Isabelle Savard Naima Bouabdillah Julie Houle Geneviève St-Louis Mira Jabbour Renee Atallah
author_sort	Maud-Christine Chouinard
title	Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol
title_short	Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol
title_full	Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol
title_fullStr	Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol
title_full_unstemmed	Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol
title_sort	identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol
publisher	BMJ Publishing Group
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/d8ba7e6d646a41618fa83f94f2904f02
work_keys_str_mv	AT maudchristinechouinard identifyingindicatorssensitivetoprimaryhealthcarenursepractitionerpracticeareviewofsystematicreviewsprotocol AT ericnguemeleutchouaket identifyingindicatorssensitivetoprimaryhealthcarenursepractitionerpracticeareviewofsystematicreviewsprotocol AT kelleykilpatrick identifyingindicatorssensitivetoprimaryhealthcarenursepractitionerpracticeareviewofsystematicreviewsprotocol AT isabellesavard identifyingindicatorssensitivetoprimaryhealthcarenursepractitionerpracticeareviewofsystematicreviewsprotocol AT naimabouabdillah identifyingindicatorssensitivetoprimaryhealthcarenursepractitionerpracticeareviewofsystematicreviewsprotocol AT juliehoule identifyingindicatorssensitivetoprimaryhealthcarenursepractitionerpracticeareviewofsystematicreviewsprotocol AT genevievestlouis identifyingindicatorssensitivetoprimaryhealthcarenursepractitionerpracticeareviewofsystematicreviewsprotocol AT mirajabbour identifyingindicatorssensitivetoprimaryhealthcarenursepractitionerpracticeareviewofsystematicreviewsprotocol AT reneeatallah identifyingindicatorssensitivetoprimaryhealthcarenursepractitionerpracticeareviewofsystematicreviewsprotocol
_version_	1718420040731066368

Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol

Ejemplares similares