Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory
ABSTRACT Antibiotic intervention is an effective treatment strategy for many bacterial infections and liberates bacterial antigens and stimulatory products that can induce an inflammatory response. Despite the opportunity for bacterial killing to enhance the development of adaptive immunity, patient...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d8ecf2cc32ca478d86e26dd1385f3aad |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d8ecf2cc32ca478d86e26dd1385f3aad |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d8ecf2cc32ca478d86e26dd1385f3aad2021-11-15T15:50:16ZCollateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory10.1128/mBio.01520-162150-7511https://doaj.org/article/d8ecf2cc32ca478d86e26dd1385f3aad2016-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mBio.01520-16https://doaj.org/toc/2150-7511ABSTRACT Antibiotic intervention is an effective treatment strategy for many bacterial infections and liberates bacterial antigens and stimulatory products that can induce an inflammatory response. Despite the opportunity for bacterial killing to enhance the development of adaptive immunity, patients treated successfully with antibiotics can suffer from reinfection. Studies in mouse models of Salmonella and Chlamydia infection also demonstrate that early antibiotic intervention reduces host protective immunity to subsequent infection. This heightened susceptibility to reinfection correlates with poor development of Th1 and antibody responses in antibiotic-treated mice but can be overcome by delayed antibiotic intervention, thus suggesting a requirement for sustained T cell stimulation for protection. Although the contribution of memory T cell subsets is imperfectly understood in both of these infection models, a protective role for noncirculating memory cells is suggested by recent studies. Together, these data propose a model where antibiotic treatment specifically interrupts tissue-resident memory T cell formation. Greater understanding of the mechanistic basis of this phenomenon might suggest therapeutic interventions to restore a protective memory response in antibiotic-treated patients, thus reducing the incidence of reinfection.Joseph M. BenounJasmine C. LabudaStephen J. McSorleyAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleMicrobiologyQR1-502ENmBio, Vol 7, Iss 6 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Microbiology QR1-502 |
spellingShingle |
Microbiology QR1-502 Joseph M. Benoun Jasmine C. Labuda Stephen J. McSorley Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory |
description |
ABSTRACT Antibiotic intervention is an effective treatment strategy for many bacterial infections and liberates bacterial antigens and stimulatory products that can induce an inflammatory response. Despite the opportunity for bacterial killing to enhance the development of adaptive immunity, patients treated successfully with antibiotics can suffer from reinfection. Studies in mouse models of Salmonella and Chlamydia infection also demonstrate that early antibiotic intervention reduces host protective immunity to subsequent infection. This heightened susceptibility to reinfection correlates with poor development of Th1 and antibody responses in antibiotic-treated mice but can be overcome by delayed antibiotic intervention, thus suggesting a requirement for sustained T cell stimulation for protection. Although the contribution of memory T cell subsets is imperfectly understood in both of these infection models, a protective role for noncirculating memory cells is suggested by recent studies. Together, these data propose a model where antibiotic treatment specifically interrupts tissue-resident memory T cell formation. Greater understanding of the mechanistic basis of this phenomenon might suggest therapeutic interventions to restore a protective memory response in antibiotic-treated patients, thus reducing the incidence of reinfection. |
format |
article |
author |
Joseph M. Benoun Jasmine C. Labuda Stephen J. McSorley |
author_facet |
Joseph M. Benoun Jasmine C. Labuda Stephen J. McSorley |
author_sort |
Joseph M. Benoun |
title |
Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory |
title_short |
Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory |
title_full |
Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory |
title_fullStr |
Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Collateral Damage: Detrimental Effect of Antibiotics on the Development of Protective Immune Memory |
title_sort |
collateral damage: detrimental effect of antibiotics on the development of protective immune memory |
publisher |
American Society for Microbiology |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d8ecf2cc32ca478d86e26dd1385f3aad |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT josephmbenoun collateraldamagedetrimentaleffectofantibioticsonthedevelopmentofprotectiveimmunememory AT jasmineclabuda collateraldamagedetrimentaleffectofantibioticsonthedevelopmentofprotectiveimmunememory AT stephenjmcsorley collateraldamagedetrimentaleffectofantibioticsonthedevelopmentofprotectiveimmunememory |
_version_ |
1718427490093891584 |