Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies

The aim of this discussion paper is to raise awareness of the conceptual and practical limits of mainstream practices in social measurement and to suggest possible directions for social indicator construction, in view of effectively supporting policies for social sustainability and well-being promot...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alberto Arcagni, Marco Fattore, Filomena Maggino, Giorgio Vittadini
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d907160306e649a093f33d2e71d5ae49
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d907160306e649a093f33d2e71d5ae49
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d907160306e649a093f33d2e71d5ae492021-11-25T19:03:14ZSome Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies10.3390/su1322126792071-1050https://doaj.org/article/d907160306e649a093f33d2e71d5ae492021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12679https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050The aim of this discussion paper is to raise awareness of the conceptual and practical limits of mainstream practices in social measurement and to suggest possible directions for social indicator construction, in view of effectively supporting policies for social sustainability and well-being promotion. We start with a review of the epistemological issues raised by the measurement of social phenomena, investigate the notion of social complexity, and discuss the critical link between it and measurement. We then suggest that social indicators should be primarily designed to build structural syntheses of the data, unfolding the patterns and stylizing the complexity of social phenomena, rather than computed pursuing numerical precision, through hardly interpretable aggregated measures. This calls for tools and algorithms capable of rendering structural information, preserving the essential traits of complexity and overcoming the limitations of classical aggregation procedures. We provide some examples along this line, using real data pertaining to regional well-being in OECD countries.Alberto ArcagniMarco FattoreFilomena MagginoGiorgio VittadiniMDPI AGarticlecomplexitynon-aggregative approachsocial measurementsocial sustainabilitysynthetic indicatorswell-beingEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 12679, p 12679 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic complexity
non-aggregative approach
social measurement
social sustainability
synthetic indicators
well-being
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle complexity
non-aggregative approach
social measurement
social sustainability
synthetic indicators
well-being
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Alberto Arcagni
Marco Fattore
Filomena Maggino
Giorgio Vittadini
Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies
description The aim of this discussion paper is to raise awareness of the conceptual and practical limits of mainstream practices in social measurement and to suggest possible directions for social indicator construction, in view of effectively supporting policies for social sustainability and well-being promotion. We start with a review of the epistemological issues raised by the measurement of social phenomena, investigate the notion of social complexity, and discuss the critical link between it and measurement. We then suggest that social indicators should be primarily designed to build structural syntheses of the data, unfolding the patterns and stylizing the complexity of social phenomena, rather than computed pursuing numerical precision, through hardly interpretable aggregated measures. This calls for tools and algorithms capable of rendering structural information, preserving the essential traits of complexity and overcoming the limitations of classical aggregation procedures. We provide some examples along this line, using real data pertaining to regional well-being in OECD countries.
format article
author Alberto Arcagni
Marco Fattore
Filomena Maggino
Giorgio Vittadini
author_facet Alberto Arcagni
Marco Fattore
Filomena Maggino
Giorgio Vittadini
author_sort Alberto Arcagni
title Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies
title_short Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies
title_full Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies
title_fullStr Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies
title_full_unstemmed Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies
title_sort some critical reflections on the measurement of social sustainability and well-being in complex societies
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d907160306e649a093f33d2e71d5ae49
work_keys_str_mv AT albertoarcagni somecriticalreflectionsonthemeasurementofsocialsustainabilityandwellbeingincomplexsocieties
AT marcofattore somecriticalreflectionsonthemeasurementofsocialsustainabilityandwellbeingincomplexsocieties
AT filomenamaggino somecriticalreflectionsonthemeasurementofsocialsustainabilityandwellbeingincomplexsocieties
AT giorgiovittadini somecriticalreflectionsonthemeasurementofsocialsustainabilityandwellbeingincomplexsocieties
_version_ 1718410367462277120