Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies
The aim of this discussion paper is to raise awareness of the conceptual and practical limits of mainstream practices in social measurement and to suggest possible directions for social indicator construction, in view of effectively supporting policies for social sustainability and well-being promot...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d907160306e649a093f33d2e71d5ae49 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d907160306e649a093f33d2e71d5ae49 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d907160306e649a093f33d2e71d5ae492021-11-25T19:03:14ZSome Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies10.3390/su1322126792071-1050https://doaj.org/article/d907160306e649a093f33d2e71d5ae492021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12679https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050The aim of this discussion paper is to raise awareness of the conceptual and practical limits of mainstream practices in social measurement and to suggest possible directions for social indicator construction, in view of effectively supporting policies for social sustainability and well-being promotion. We start with a review of the epistemological issues raised by the measurement of social phenomena, investigate the notion of social complexity, and discuss the critical link between it and measurement. We then suggest that social indicators should be primarily designed to build structural syntheses of the data, unfolding the patterns and stylizing the complexity of social phenomena, rather than computed pursuing numerical precision, through hardly interpretable aggregated measures. This calls for tools and algorithms capable of rendering structural information, preserving the essential traits of complexity and overcoming the limitations of classical aggregation procedures. We provide some examples along this line, using real data pertaining to regional well-being in OECD countries.Alberto ArcagniMarco FattoreFilomena MagginoGiorgio VittadiniMDPI AGarticlecomplexitynon-aggregative approachsocial measurementsocial sustainabilitysynthetic indicatorswell-beingEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 12679, p 12679 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
complexity non-aggregative approach social measurement social sustainability synthetic indicators well-being Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350 |
spellingShingle |
complexity non-aggregative approach social measurement social sustainability synthetic indicators well-being Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Alberto Arcagni Marco Fattore Filomena Maggino Giorgio Vittadini Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies |
description |
The aim of this discussion paper is to raise awareness of the conceptual and practical limits of mainstream practices in social measurement and to suggest possible directions for social indicator construction, in view of effectively supporting policies for social sustainability and well-being promotion. We start with a review of the epistemological issues raised by the measurement of social phenomena, investigate the notion of social complexity, and discuss the critical link between it and measurement. We then suggest that social indicators should be primarily designed to build structural syntheses of the data, unfolding the patterns and stylizing the complexity of social phenomena, rather than computed pursuing numerical precision, through hardly interpretable aggregated measures. This calls for tools and algorithms capable of rendering structural information, preserving the essential traits of complexity and overcoming the limitations of classical aggregation procedures. We provide some examples along this line, using real data pertaining to regional well-being in OECD countries. |
format |
article |
author |
Alberto Arcagni Marco Fattore Filomena Maggino Giorgio Vittadini |
author_facet |
Alberto Arcagni Marco Fattore Filomena Maggino Giorgio Vittadini |
author_sort |
Alberto Arcagni |
title |
Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies |
title_short |
Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies |
title_full |
Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies |
title_fullStr |
Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Some Critical Reflections on the Measurement of Social Sustainability and Well-Being in Complex Societies |
title_sort |
some critical reflections on the measurement of social sustainability and well-being in complex societies |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d907160306e649a093f33d2e71d5ae49 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT albertoarcagni somecriticalreflectionsonthemeasurementofsocialsustainabilityandwellbeingincomplexsocieties AT marcofattore somecriticalreflectionsonthemeasurementofsocialsustainabilityandwellbeingincomplexsocieties AT filomenamaggino somecriticalreflectionsonthemeasurementofsocialsustainabilityandwellbeingincomplexsocieties AT giorgiovittadini somecriticalreflectionsonthemeasurementofsocialsustainabilityandwellbeingincomplexsocieties |
_version_ |
1718410367462277120 |