The trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics
Recent decades have seen the rapid development of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and methods of prenatal diagnosis. As a result, there are now several ways to predict the genetic sex of embryos as well as visualizing the sex of fetuses. However, how, when and where these technologies may...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | DA EN NB SV |
Publicado: |
The Royal Danish Library
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d91d85cf0c5d40819789d30271be63e7 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d91d85cf0c5d40819789d30271be63e7 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d91d85cf0c5d40819789d30271be63e72021-12-01T00:04:52ZThe trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics10.7146/kkf.v27i1.1096782245-6937https://doaj.org/article/d91d85cf0c5d40819789d30271be63e72018-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://tidsskrift.dk/KKF/article/view/109678https://doaj.org/toc/2245-6937 Recent decades have seen the rapid development of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and methods of prenatal diagnosis. As a result, there are now several ways to predict the genetic sex of embryos as well as visualizing the sex of fetuses. However, how, when and where these technologies may be used have become politicized questions, both internationally and in Sweden. By providing a close reading of the Swedish political debate about technologies for the determination of the sex of fetuses and embryos from the end of the 1980s onwards, this article shows how technologies of prenatal diagnosis are articulated as problematic in the context of sex-determination. By “staying with the trouble” of sex in the political debate about sex-determination, we discuss how the ability to identify fetal or chromosomic sex through prenatal diagnosis is articulated as an unwanted trouble warranting political and ethical concern. The article also highlights the “ethico-political” restrictions imposed on information about the unborn’s sex. It shows that, rather than prenatal diagnosis enabling promissory or hopeful visions of the future, the political debate is preoccupied with feelings of concern about the potential misuses of these technologies. Lisa LindénHelena Tinnerholm LjungbergThe Royal Danish Libraryarticleprenatal diagnosispolitical debatesex-determinationtechnologies of troubleethico-politicsfeelings of concernSocial SciencesHDAENNBSVKvinder, Køn & Forskning, Vol 27, Iss 1 (2018) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
DA EN NB SV |
topic |
prenatal diagnosis political debate sex-determination technologies of trouble ethico-politics feelings of concern Social Sciences H |
spellingShingle |
prenatal diagnosis political debate sex-determination technologies of trouble ethico-politics feelings of concern Social Sciences H Lisa Lindén Helena Tinnerholm Ljungberg The trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics |
description |
Recent decades have seen the rapid development of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and methods of prenatal diagnosis. As a result, there are now several ways to predict the genetic sex of embryos as well as visualizing the sex of fetuses. However, how, when and where these technologies may be used have become politicized questions, both internationally and in Sweden. By providing a close reading of the Swedish political debate about technologies for the determination of the sex of fetuses and embryos from the end of the 1980s onwards, this article shows how technologies of prenatal diagnosis are articulated as problematic in the context of sex-determination. By “staying with the trouble” of sex in the political debate about sex-determination, we discuss how the ability to identify fetal or chromosomic sex through prenatal diagnosis is articulated as an unwanted trouble warranting political and ethical concern. The article also highlights the “ethico-political” restrictions imposed on information about the unborn’s sex. It shows that, rather than prenatal diagnosis enabling promissory or hopeful visions of the future, the political debate is preoccupied with feelings of concern about the potential misuses of these technologies.
|
format |
article |
author |
Lisa Lindén Helena Tinnerholm Ljungberg |
author_facet |
Lisa Lindén Helena Tinnerholm Ljungberg |
author_sort |
Lisa Lindén |
title |
The trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics |
title_short |
The trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics |
title_full |
The trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics |
title_fullStr |
The trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics |
title_full_unstemmed |
The trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics |
title_sort |
trouble of sex: sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics |
publisher |
The Royal Danish Library |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d91d85cf0c5d40819789d30271be63e7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lisalinden thetroubleofsexsexdeterminationprenataldiagnosisandpolitics AT helenatinnerholmljungberg thetroubleofsexsexdeterminationprenataldiagnosisandpolitics AT lisalinden troubleofsexsexdeterminationprenataldiagnosisandpolitics AT helenatinnerholmljungberg troubleofsexsexdeterminationprenataldiagnosisandpolitics |
_version_ |
1718406168661983232 |