The trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics

Recent decades have seen the rapid development of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and methods of prenatal diagnosis. As a result, there are now several ways to predict the genetic sex of embryos as well as visualizing the sex of fetuses. However, how, when and where these technologies may...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lisa Lindén, Helena Tinnerholm Ljungberg
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DA
EN
NB
SV
Publicado: The Royal Danish Library 2018
Materias:
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d91d85cf0c5d40819789d30271be63e7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d91d85cf0c5d40819789d30271be63e7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d91d85cf0c5d40819789d30271be63e72021-12-01T00:04:52ZThe trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics10.7146/kkf.v27i1.1096782245-6937https://doaj.org/article/d91d85cf0c5d40819789d30271be63e72018-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://tidsskrift.dk/KKF/article/view/109678https://doaj.org/toc/2245-6937 Recent decades have seen the rapid development of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and methods of prenatal diagnosis. As a result, there are now several ways to predict the genetic sex of embryos as well as visualizing the sex of fetuses. However, how, when and where these technologies may be used have become politicized questions, both internationally and in Sweden. By providing a close reading of the Swedish political debate about technologies for the determination of the sex of fetuses and embryos from the end of the 1980s onwards, this article shows how technologies of prenatal diagnosis are articulated as problematic in the context of sex-determination. By “staying with the trouble” of sex in the political debate about sex-determination, we discuss how the ability to identify fetal or chromosomic sex through prenatal diagnosis is articulated as an unwanted trouble warranting political and ethical concern. The article also highlights the “ethico-political” restrictions imposed on information about the unborn’s sex. It shows that, rather than prenatal diagnosis enabling promissory or hopeful visions of the future, the political debate is preoccupied with feelings of concern about the potential misuses of these technologies.  Lisa LindénHelena Tinnerholm LjungbergThe Royal Danish Libraryarticleprenatal diagnosispolitical debatesex-determinationtechnologies of troubleethico-politicsfeelings of concernSocial SciencesHDAENNBSVKvinder, Køn & Forskning, Vol 27, Iss 1 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DA
EN
NB
SV
topic prenatal diagnosis
political debate
sex-determination
technologies of trouble
ethico-politics
feelings of concern
Social Sciences
H
spellingShingle prenatal diagnosis
political debate
sex-determination
technologies of trouble
ethico-politics
feelings of concern
Social Sciences
H
Lisa Lindén
Helena Tinnerholm Ljungberg
The trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics
description Recent decades have seen the rapid development of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and methods of prenatal diagnosis. As a result, there are now several ways to predict the genetic sex of embryos as well as visualizing the sex of fetuses. However, how, when and where these technologies may be used have become politicized questions, both internationally and in Sweden. By providing a close reading of the Swedish political debate about technologies for the determination of the sex of fetuses and embryos from the end of the 1980s onwards, this article shows how technologies of prenatal diagnosis are articulated as problematic in the context of sex-determination. By “staying with the trouble” of sex in the political debate about sex-determination, we discuss how the ability to identify fetal or chromosomic sex through prenatal diagnosis is articulated as an unwanted trouble warranting political and ethical concern. The article also highlights the “ethico-political” restrictions imposed on information about the unborn’s sex. It shows that, rather than prenatal diagnosis enabling promissory or hopeful visions of the future, the political debate is preoccupied with feelings of concern about the potential misuses of these technologies. 
format article
author Lisa Lindén
Helena Tinnerholm Ljungberg
author_facet Lisa Lindén
Helena Tinnerholm Ljungberg
author_sort Lisa Lindén
title The trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics
title_short The trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics
title_full The trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics
title_fullStr The trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics
title_full_unstemmed The trouble of sex: Sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics
title_sort trouble of sex: sex-determination, prenatal diagnosis and politics
publisher The Royal Danish Library
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/d91d85cf0c5d40819789d30271be63e7
work_keys_str_mv AT lisalinden thetroubleofsexsexdeterminationprenataldiagnosisandpolitics
AT helenatinnerholmljungberg thetroubleofsexsexdeterminationprenataldiagnosisandpolitics
AT lisalinden troubleofsexsexdeterminationprenataldiagnosisandpolitics
AT helenatinnerholmljungberg troubleofsexsexdeterminationprenataldiagnosisandpolitics
_version_ 1718406168661983232