Study of Forage Quality of Grasslands on the Southern Margin of the Pannonian Basin

Since grasslands provide many ecosystem services, there are often different opinions on their management (e.g., agronomy, ecology, botany). Multidisciplinary research on this topic is therefore needed. This article focuses on the impact of ecological conditions, functional groups, ecological strateg...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andraž Čarni, Mirjana Ćuk, Daniel Krstonošić, Željko Škvorc
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
S
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d93fe7d051694b36850e7fd79288ad82
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d93fe7d051694b36850e7fd79288ad82
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d93fe7d051694b36850e7fd79288ad822021-11-25T16:03:44ZStudy of Forage Quality of Grasslands on the Southern Margin of the Pannonian Basin10.3390/agronomy111121322073-4395https://doaj.org/article/d93fe7d051694b36850e7fd79288ad822021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/11/2132https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395Since grasslands provide many ecosystem services, there are often different opinions on their management (e.g., agronomy, ecology, botany). Multidisciplinary research on this topic is therefore needed. This article focuses on the impact of ecological conditions, functional groups, ecological strategies, floristic composition (through habitat preference of species), major floristic gradients (presented as first two NMDS axes), and the management on forage quality. We estimated the forage quality using indicator values. All of the available vegetation plots in the region on wet and mesic meadows, managed pastures, and tall-herb meadow/pasture fringes on deeper or shallower soils (i.e., grasslands) were collected, organized in a database, and elaborated according to standard procedure. We used a widely accepted grassland classification system that uses floristic composition to define grassland types. Based on an NMDS ordination diagram and according to functional groups, ecological strategies, and habitat preferences (behavior of species) and management, we defined three major groups: mesic meadows (mowed), wet meadows (mowed), and pastures (grazed). We correlated all groups’ functional groups, ecological strategies, habitat preferences (behavior of species), major floristic gradients, management, and forage quality. We found that forage quality mainly depends on moisture conditions and that nutrients and grazing are less important. Within the grasslands under consideration, mesic meadows and mesic pastures have the highest forage quality.Andraž ČarniMirjana ĆukDaniel KrstonošićŽeljko ŠkvorcMDPI AGarticlefunctional groupecological strategygrazingmowingvegetationAgricultureSENAgronomy, Vol 11, Iss 2132, p 2132 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic functional group
ecological strategy
grazing
mowing
vegetation
Agriculture
S
spellingShingle functional group
ecological strategy
grazing
mowing
vegetation
Agriculture
S
Andraž Čarni
Mirjana Ćuk
Daniel Krstonošić
Željko Škvorc
Study of Forage Quality of Grasslands on the Southern Margin of the Pannonian Basin
description Since grasslands provide many ecosystem services, there are often different opinions on their management (e.g., agronomy, ecology, botany). Multidisciplinary research on this topic is therefore needed. This article focuses on the impact of ecological conditions, functional groups, ecological strategies, floristic composition (through habitat preference of species), major floristic gradients (presented as first two NMDS axes), and the management on forage quality. We estimated the forage quality using indicator values. All of the available vegetation plots in the region on wet and mesic meadows, managed pastures, and tall-herb meadow/pasture fringes on deeper or shallower soils (i.e., grasslands) were collected, organized in a database, and elaborated according to standard procedure. We used a widely accepted grassland classification system that uses floristic composition to define grassland types. Based on an NMDS ordination diagram and according to functional groups, ecological strategies, and habitat preferences (behavior of species) and management, we defined three major groups: mesic meadows (mowed), wet meadows (mowed), and pastures (grazed). We correlated all groups’ functional groups, ecological strategies, habitat preferences (behavior of species), major floristic gradients, management, and forage quality. We found that forage quality mainly depends on moisture conditions and that nutrients and grazing are less important. Within the grasslands under consideration, mesic meadows and mesic pastures have the highest forage quality.
format article
author Andraž Čarni
Mirjana Ćuk
Daniel Krstonošić
Željko Škvorc
author_facet Andraž Čarni
Mirjana Ćuk
Daniel Krstonošić
Željko Škvorc
author_sort Andraž Čarni
title Study of Forage Quality of Grasslands on the Southern Margin of the Pannonian Basin
title_short Study of Forage Quality of Grasslands on the Southern Margin of the Pannonian Basin
title_full Study of Forage Quality of Grasslands on the Southern Margin of the Pannonian Basin
title_fullStr Study of Forage Quality of Grasslands on the Southern Margin of the Pannonian Basin
title_full_unstemmed Study of Forage Quality of Grasslands on the Southern Margin of the Pannonian Basin
title_sort study of forage quality of grasslands on the southern margin of the pannonian basin
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d93fe7d051694b36850e7fd79288ad82
work_keys_str_mv AT andrazcarni studyofforagequalityofgrasslandsonthesouthernmarginofthepannonianbasin
AT mirjanacuk studyofforagequalityofgrasslandsonthesouthernmarginofthepannonianbasin
AT danielkrstonosic studyofforagequalityofgrasslandsonthesouthernmarginofthepannonianbasin
AT zeljkoskvorc studyofforagequalityofgrasslandsonthesouthernmarginofthepannonianbasin
_version_ 1718413346069282816