Effects of Adper<sup>™</sup> Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> 1 XT, Clearfil<sup>™</sup> SE Bond 2 and Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> Universal in Odontoblasts
This study aimed to assess the cytotoxicity of commercially available adhesive strategies—etch-and-rinse (Adper<sup>™</sup> Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> 1 XT, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA, SB1), self-etch (Clearfil<sup>™</sup> SE Bond 2, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Toky...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d94776ae5bc340d3a08ed8bbb771ddf6 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d94776ae5bc340d3a08ed8bbb771ddf6 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d94776ae5bc340d3a08ed8bbb771ddf62021-11-11T18:00:53ZEffects of Adper<sup>™</sup> Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> 1 XT, Clearfil<sup>™</sup> SE Bond 2 and Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> Universal in Odontoblasts10.3390/ma142164351996-1944https://doaj.org/article/d94776ae5bc340d3a08ed8bbb771ddf62021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6435https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1944This study aimed to assess the cytotoxicity of commercially available adhesive strategies—etch-and-rinse (Adper<sup>™</sup> Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> 1 XT, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA, SB1), self-etch (Clearfil<sup>™</sup> SE Bond 2, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Tokyo, Japan, CSE), and universal (Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> Universal, 3M Deutschland GmbH, Neuss, Germany, SBU). MDPC-23 cells were exposed to adhesives extracts in different concentrations and exposure times. To access cell metabolic activity, viability, types of cell death, and cell cycle, the MTT assay, SRB assay, double labeling with annexin V and propidium iodide, and labeling with propidium iodide/RNAse were performed, respectively. Cultures were stained with May-Grünwald Giemsa for qualitative cytotoxicity assessment. The SB1, CSE, and SBU extracts determined a significant reduction in cell metabolism and viability. This reduction was higher for prolonged exposures, even for less concentrated extracts. CSE extracts significantly reduced the cell’s metabolic activity at higher concentrations (50% and 100%) from 2 h of exposure. After 24 and 96 h, a metabolic activity reduction was verified for all adhesives, even at lower concentrations. These changes were dependent on the adhesive, its concentration, and the incubation time. Regarding cell viability, SBU extracts were the least cytotoxic, and CSE was significantly more cytotoxic than SB1 and SBU. The adhesives determined a reduction in viable cells and an increase in apoptotic, late apoptosis/necrosis, and necrotic cells. Moreover, on cultures exposed to SB1 and CSE extracts, a decrease in the cells in S and G2/M phases and an increase in the cells in G0/G1 phase was observed. Exposure to SBU led to an increase of cells in the S phase. In general, all adhesives determined cytotoxicity. CSE extracts were the most cytotoxic and were classified as having a higher degree of reactivity, leading to more significant inhibition of cell growth and destruction of the cell’s layers.Miguel CardosoAna CoelhoCarlos Miguel MartoAna Cristina GonçalvesAnabela PaulaAna Bela Sarmento RibeiroManuel Marques FerreiraMaria Filomena BotelhoMafalda LaranjoEunice CarrilhoMDPI AGarticledental adhesivesadhesive systemscytotoxicityOdontoblastscell cultureTechnologyTElectrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringTK1-9971Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040MicroscopyQH201-278.5Descriptive and experimental mechanicsQC120-168.85ENMaterials, Vol 14, Iss 6435, p 6435 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
dental adhesives adhesive systems cytotoxicity Odontoblasts cell culture Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85 |
spellingShingle |
dental adhesives adhesive systems cytotoxicity Odontoblasts cell culture Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85 Miguel Cardoso Ana Coelho Carlos Miguel Marto Ana Cristina Gonçalves Anabela Paula Ana Bela Sarmento Ribeiro Manuel Marques Ferreira Maria Filomena Botelho Mafalda Laranjo Eunice Carrilho Effects of Adper<sup>™</sup> Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> 1 XT, Clearfil<sup>™</sup> SE Bond 2 and Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> Universal in Odontoblasts |
description |
This study aimed to assess the cytotoxicity of commercially available adhesive strategies—etch-and-rinse (Adper<sup>™</sup> Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> 1 XT, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA, SB1), self-etch (Clearfil<sup>™</sup> SE Bond 2, Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Tokyo, Japan, CSE), and universal (Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> Universal, 3M Deutschland GmbH, Neuss, Germany, SBU). MDPC-23 cells were exposed to adhesives extracts in different concentrations and exposure times. To access cell metabolic activity, viability, types of cell death, and cell cycle, the MTT assay, SRB assay, double labeling with annexin V and propidium iodide, and labeling with propidium iodide/RNAse were performed, respectively. Cultures were stained with May-Grünwald Giemsa for qualitative cytotoxicity assessment. The SB1, CSE, and SBU extracts determined a significant reduction in cell metabolism and viability. This reduction was higher for prolonged exposures, even for less concentrated extracts. CSE extracts significantly reduced the cell’s metabolic activity at higher concentrations (50% and 100%) from 2 h of exposure. After 24 and 96 h, a metabolic activity reduction was verified for all adhesives, even at lower concentrations. These changes were dependent on the adhesive, its concentration, and the incubation time. Regarding cell viability, SBU extracts were the least cytotoxic, and CSE was significantly more cytotoxic than SB1 and SBU. The adhesives determined a reduction in viable cells and an increase in apoptotic, late apoptosis/necrosis, and necrotic cells. Moreover, on cultures exposed to SB1 and CSE extracts, a decrease in the cells in S and G2/M phases and an increase in the cells in G0/G1 phase was observed. Exposure to SBU led to an increase of cells in the S phase. In general, all adhesives determined cytotoxicity. CSE extracts were the most cytotoxic and were classified as having a higher degree of reactivity, leading to more significant inhibition of cell growth and destruction of the cell’s layers. |
format |
article |
author |
Miguel Cardoso Ana Coelho Carlos Miguel Marto Ana Cristina Gonçalves Anabela Paula Ana Bela Sarmento Ribeiro Manuel Marques Ferreira Maria Filomena Botelho Mafalda Laranjo Eunice Carrilho |
author_facet |
Miguel Cardoso Ana Coelho Carlos Miguel Marto Ana Cristina Gonçalves Anabela Paula Ana Bela Sarmento Ribeiro Manuel Marques Ferreira Maria Filomena Botelho Mafalda Laranjo Eunice Carrilho |
author_sort |
Miguel Cardoso |
title |
Effects of Adper<sup>™</sup> Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> 1 XT, Clearfil<sup>™</sup> SE Bond 2 and Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> Universal in Odontoblasts |
title_short |
Effects of Adper<sup>™</sup> Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> 1 XT, Clearfil<sup>™</sup> SE Bond 2 and Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> Universal in Odontoblasts |
title_full |
Effects of Adper<sup>™</sup> Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> 1 XT, Clearfil<sup>™</sup> SE Bond 2 and Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> Universal in Odontoblasts |
title_fullStr |
Effects of Adper<sup>™</sup> Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> 1 XT, Clearfil<sup>™</sup> SE Bond 2 and Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> Universal in Odontoblasts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of Adper<sup>™</sup> Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> 1 XT, Clearfil<sup>™</sup> SE Bond 2 and Scotchbond<sup>™</sup> Universal in Odontoblasts |
title_sort |
effects of adper<sup>™</sup> scotchbond<sup>™</sup> 1 xt, clearfil<sup>™</sup> se bond 2 and scotchbond<sup>™</sup> universal in odontoblasts |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d94776ae5bc340d3a08ed8bbb771ddf6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT miguelcardoso effectsofadpersupsupscotchbondsupsup1xtclearfilsupsupsebond2andscotchbondsupsupuniversalinodontoblasts AT anacoelho effectsofadpersupsupscotchbondsupsup1xtclearfilsupsupsebond2andscotchbondsupsupuniversalinodontoblasts AT carlosmiguelmarto effectsofadpersupsupscotchbondsupsup1xtclearfilsupsupsebond2andscotchbondsupsupuniversalinodontoblasts AT anacristinagoncalves effectsofadpersupsupscotchbondsupsup1xtclearfilsupsupsebond2andscotchbondsupsupuniversalinodontoblasts AT anabelapaula effectsofadpersupsupscotchbondsupsup1xtclearfilsupsupsebond2andscotchbondsupsupuniversalinodontoblasts AT anabelasarmentoribeiro effectsofadpersupsupscotchbondsupsup1xtclearfilsupsupsebond2andscotchbondsupsupuniversalinodontoblasts AT manuelmarquesferreira effectsofadpersupsupscotchbondsupsup1xtclearfilsupsupsebond2andscotchbondsupsupuniversalinodontoblasts AT mariafilomenabotelho effectsofadpersupsupscotchbondsupsup1xtclearfilsupsupsebond2andscotchbondsupsupuniversalinodontoblasts AT mafaldalaranjo effectsofadpersupsupscotchbondsupsup1xtclearfilsupsupsebond2andscotchbondsupsupuniversalinodontoblasts AT eunicecarrilho effectsofadpersupsupscotchbondsupsup1xtclearfilsupsupsebond2andscotchbondsupsupuniversalinodontoblasts |
_version_ |
1718431972557062144 |