Does the facebow affect the outcome of CAD/CAM occlusal splint. Randomized clinical trial

Background: Occlusal appliances can distribute aggressive loads which are generated by bruxism and can reduce their frequency. The facebow record, when used in the construction of occlusal appliances, helps in minimizing occlusal discrepancies. This study aimed to compare the effect of CAD/CAM stabi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi, Radwan Algabri, Wafaa Ibrahim Ibrahim, Sary Borzangy
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d95db903b6254bf0931547c01fee80dc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d95db903b6254bf0931547c01fee80dc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d95db903b6254bf0931547c01fee80dc2021-11-10T04:19:01ZDoes the facebow affect the outcome of CAD/CAM occlusal splint. Randomized clinical trial1013-905210.1016/j.sdentj.2020.07.002https://doaj.org/article/d95db903b6254bf0931547c01fee80dc2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905220307434https://doaj.org/toc/1013-9052Background: Occlusal appliances can distribute aggressive loads which are generated by bruxism and can reduce their frequency. The facebow record, when used in the construction of occlusal appliances, helps in minimizing occlusal discrepancies. This study aimed to compare the effect of CAD/CAM stabilization occlusal splint made with and without facebow for management of bruxer patients. Method: 24 Patients who were diagnosed as bruxers were randomly assigned into two equal groups and obtained maxillary CAD/CAM occlusal stabilizing splint recorded with centric relation either with or without using a facebow. The patient satisfaction using the visual analog scale (VAS) was recorded at baseline, one month and three months’ follow-up periods. The adjustment time of both splints, from the start of splint delivery until becoming well-fitted and occlusally adjusted, was calculated using a stopwatch. Results: The CAD/CAM occlusal splints with or without the use of facebow improved the patient's satisfaction with no statistically significant difference between both groups at baseline, one month and three months with p values of 0.73, 0.24 and 0.45 respectively. The comparison between the two modalities regarding the adjustment time showed no statistically significant difference between both groups (P = 0.06). Conclusion: According to the results of this study; no difference was detected in patient satisfaction and the time required for adjustment of CAD/CAM occlus.Ahmed Yaseen AlqutaibiRadwan AlgabriWafaa Ibrahim IbrahimSary BorzangyElsevierarticleFacebowBruxismOcclusal splintCAD/CAMMedicineRDentistryRK1-715ENSaudi Dental Journal, Vol 33, Iss 7, Pp 628-634 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Facebow
Bruxism
Occlusal splint
CAD/CAM
Medicine
R
Dentistry
RK1-715
spellingShingle Facebow
Bruxism
Occlusal splint
CAD/CAM
Medicine
R
Dentistry
RK1-715
Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi
Radwan Algabri
Wafaa Ibrahim Ibrahim
Sary Borzangy
Does the facebow affect the outcome of CAD/CAM occlusal splint. Randomized clinical trial
description Background: Occlusal appliances can distribute aggressive loads which are generated by bruxism and can reduce their frequency. The facebow record, when used in the construction of occlusal appliances, helps in minimizing occlusal discrepancies. This study aimed to compare the effect of CAD/CAM stabilization occlusal splint made with and without facebow for management of bruxer patients. Method: 24 Patients who were diagnosed as bruxers were randomly assigned into two equal groups and obtained maxillary CAD/CAM occlusal stabilizing splint recorded with centric relation either with or without using a facebow. The patient satisfaction using the visual analog scale (VAS) was recorded at baseline, one month and three months’ follow-up periods. The adjustment time of both splints, from the start of splint delivery until becoming well-fitted and occlusally adjusted, was calculated using a stopwatch. Results: The CAD/CAM occlusal splints with or without the use of facebow improved the patient's satisfaction with no statistically significant difference between both groups at baseline, one month and three months with p values of 0.73, 0.24 and 0.45 respectively. The comparison between the two modalities regarding the adjustment time showed no statistically significant difference between both groups (P = 0.06). Conclusion: According to the results of this study; no difference was detected in patient satisfaction and the time required for adjustment of CAD/CAM occlus.
format article
author Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi
Radwan Algabri
Wafaa Ibrahim Ibrahim
Sary Borzangy
author_facet Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi
Radwan Algabri
Wafaa Ibrahim Ibrahim
Sary Borzangy
author_sort Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi
title Does the facebow affect the outcome of CAD/CAM occlusal splint. Randomized clinical trial
title_short Does the facebow affect the outcome of CAD/CAM occlusal splint. Randomized clinical trial
title_full Does the facebow affect the outcome of CAD/CAM occlusal splint. Randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Does the facebow affect the outcome of CAD/CAM occlusal splint. Randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Does the facebow affect the outcome of CAD/CAM occlusal splint. Randomized clinical trial
title_sort does the facebow affect the outcome of cad/cam occlusal splint. randomized clinical trial
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d95db903b6254bf0931547c01fee80dc
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedyaseenalqutaibi doesthefacebowaffecttheoutcomeofcadcamocclusalsplintrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT radwanalgabri doesthefacebowaffecttheoutcomeofcadcamocclusalsplintrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT wafaaibrahimibrahim doesthefacebowaffecttheoutcomeofcadcamocclusalsplintrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT saryborzangy doesthefacebowaffecttheoutcomeofcadcamocclusalsplintrandomizedclinicaltrial
_version_ 1718440697952993280