Productivity Metrics and Its Implementations in Construction Projects: A Case Study of Singapore
Although some studies have used or developed different types of metrics to assess construction productivity in the existing literature, few of them investigated those metrics systematically and the differences between assessment results. This study examined the various types of metrics used in the a...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d9640f9c26ad4b7fa15eaaa7838b4fca |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d9640f9c26ad4b7fa15eaaa7838b4fca |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d9640f9c26ad4b7fa15eaaa7838b4fca2021-11-11T19:45:24ZProductivity Metrics and Its Implementations in Construction Projects: A Case Study of Singapore10.3390/su1321121322071-1050https://doaj.org/article/d9640f9c26ad4b7fa15eaaa7838b4fca2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12132https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050Although some studies have used or developed different types of metrics to assess construction productivity in the existing literature, few of them investigated those metrics systematically and the differences between assessment results. This study examined the various types of metrics used in the assessment of the productivity of construction projects. First, a literature review was conducted first to identify prevailing productivity metrics at four levels, namely trade, project, company, and industry. Then, the questionnaire was developed and disseminated to 53 Singapore-based construction companies for data collection. Subsequently, non-parametric statistical tests were conducted to analyze the data collected by the questionnaire. Results showed that the top five metrics in terms of usage frequency and relative importance were “constructability score”, “buildable design score”, “square meter of built-up floor area per man-day”, “square meter per dollar”, and “output per worker.” In addition, results showed that differences existed in the assessment results when productivity metrics at different levels were used to conduct the same measurement. This is the first study to explore the most widely used metrics in productivity assessments of construction projects and investigate possible differences in assessment results. This study could help the authorities to review, evaluate, and modify the productivity metrics used in practice. Thus, this study is beneficial to the practice as well.Ming ShanYu-Shan LiBon-Gang HwangJia-En ChuaMDPI AGarticleproductivitymetricsconstruction projectsEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 12132, p 12132 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
productivity metrics construction projects Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350 |
spellingShingle |
productivity metrics construction projects Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Ming Shan Yu-Shan Li Bon-Gang Hwang Jia-En Chua Productivity Metrics and Its Implementations in Construction Projects: A Case Study of Singapore |
description |
Although some studies have used or developed different types of metrics to assess construction productivity in the existing literature, few of them investigated those metrics systematically and the differences between assessment results. This study examined the various types of metrics used in the assessment of the productivity of construction projects. First, a literature review was conducted first to identify prevailing productivity metrics at four levels, namely trade, project, company, and industry. Then, the questionnaire was developed and disseminated to 53 Singapore-based construction companies for data collection. Subsequently, non-parametric statistical tests were conducted to analyze the data collected by the questionnaire. Results showed that the top five metrics in terms of usage frequency and relative importance were “constructability score”, “buildable design score”, “square meter of built-up floor area per man-day”, “square meter per dollar”, and “output per worker.” In addition, results showed that differences existed in the assessment results when productivity metrics at different levels were used to conduct the same measurement. This is the first study to explore the most widely used metrics in productivity assessments of construction projects and investigate possible differences in assessment results. This study could help the authorities to review, evaluate, and modify the productivity metrics used in practice. Thus, this study is beneficial to the practice as well. |
format |
article |
author |
Ming Shan Yu-Shan Li Bon-Gang Hwang Jia-En Chua |
author_facet |
Ming Shan Yu-Shan Li Bon-Gang Hwang Jia-En Chua |
author_sort |
Ming Shan |
title |
Productivity Metrics and Its Implementations in Construction Projects: A Case Study of Singapore |
title_short |
Productivity Metrics and Its Implementations in Construction Projects: A Case Study of Singapore |
title_full |
Productivity Metrics and Its Implementations in Construction Projects: A Case Study of Singapore |
title_fullStr |
Productivity Metrics and Its Implementations in Construction Projects: A Case Study of Singapore |
title_full_unstemmed |
Productivity Metrics and Its Implementations in Construction Projects: A Case Study of Singapore |
title_sort |
productivity metrics and its implementations in construction projects: a case study of singapore |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d9640f9c26ad4b7fa15eaaa7838b4fca |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mingshan productivitymetricsanditsimplementationsinconstructionprojectsacasestudyofsingapore AT yushanli productivitymetricsanditsimplementationsinconstructionprojectsacasestudyofsingapore AT bonganghwang productivitymetricsanditsimplementationsinconstructionprojectsacasestudyofsingapore AT jiaenchua productivitymetricsanditsimplementationsinconstructionprojectsacasestudyofsingapore |
_version_ |
1718431439507161088 |