Reply to: “The diamine cation is not a chemical example where density functional theory fails”
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Xinxin Cheng, Elvar Jónsson, Hannes Jónsson, Peter M. Weber |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d98b6ecd034940d398eb3ade6a16f95b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
The diamine cation is not a chemical example where density functional theory fails
por: Zulfikhar A. Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Charge localization in a diamine cation provides a test of energy functionals and self-interaction correction
por: Xinxin Cheng, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Reply to: “Results from a biodiversity experiment fail to represent economic performance of semi-natural grasslands”
por: Sergei Schaub, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Reply to Kaldalu et al., “Reanalysis of Proteomics Results Fails To Detect MazF-Mediated Stress Proteins”
por: Akanksha Nigam, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Elevating density functional theory to chemical accuracy for water simulations through a density-corrected many-body formalism
por: Saswata Dasgupta, et al.
Publicado: (2021)