Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species

Abstract Landscape conversions induced by human activities can affect dispersal patterns of various bird species and, as a result, affect genetic structure of their populations. Genetic differentiation of bird populations may be enhanced by habitat variation, especially in urban-non-urban systems. T...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Marcin Markowski, Piotr Minias, Mirosława Bańbura, Michał Glądalski, Adam Kaliński, Joanna Skwarska, Jarosław Wawrzyniak, Piotr Zieliński, Jerzy Bańbura
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d9916895da774bbbb995e4897b77ad36
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d9916895da774bbbb995e4897b77ad36
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d9916895da774bbbb995e4897b77ad362021-12-02T15:53:10ZGenetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species10.1038/s41598-021-89847-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/d9916895da774bbbb995e4897b77ad362021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89847-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Landscape conversions induced by human activities can affect dispersal patterns of various bird species and, as a result, affect genetic structure of their populations. Genetic differentiation of bird populations may be enhanced by habitat variation, especially in urban-non-urban systems. The majority of population genetic studies focus on single species, which inflicts limitations for direct comparisons of genetic responses of avian populations to urbanization. Here, we used a set of microsatellite markers to examine genetic diversity, gene flow and population structure in two common parid species, great tits Parus major and blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus occupying three sites in habitats with contrasting urbanization level in central Poland. We found low but significant divergence of urban park population with both suburban and non-urban forest great tit populations, while no differentiation was found between suburban forest and non-urban forest populations. In contrast, no evidence for genetic differentiation was found between blue tit populations from the urban park, suburban forest and non-urban forest sites. We conclude that great tits and blue tits respond to urbanization-related changes in a different way, which may be a result of different rates of migration and/or dispersal, likely higher in blue tits. Some impact may be also induced by interspecific competition. We suggest that changing the focus of urban genetic research from single to multiple species may provide novel insights into how natural populations respond to the processes of urbanization.Marcin MarkowskiPiotr MiniasMirosława BańburaMichał GlądalskiAdam KalińskiJoanna SkwarskaJarosław WawrzyniakPiotr ZielińskiJerzy BańburaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Marcin Markowski Piotr Minias Mirosława Bańbura Michał Glądalski Adam Kaliński Joanna Skwarska Jarosław Wawrzyniak Piotr Zieliński Jerzy Bańbura Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species
description	Abstract Landscape conversions induced by human activities can affect dispersal patterns of various bird species and, as a result, affect genetic structure of their populations. Genetic differentiation of bird populations may be enhanced by habitat variation, especially in urban-non-urban systems. The majority of population genetic studies focus on single species, which inflicts limitations for direct comparisons of genetic responses of avian populations to urbanization. Here, we used a set of microsatellite markers to examine genetic diversity, gene flow and population structure in two common parid species, great tits Parus major and blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus occupying three sites in habitats with contrasting urbanization level in central Poland. We found low but significant divergence of urban park population with both suburban and non-urban forest great tit populations, while no differentiation was found between suburban forest and non-urban forest populations. In contrast, no evidence for genetic differentiation was found between blue tit populations from the urban park, suburban forest and non-urban forest sites. We conclude that great tits and blue tits respond to urbanization-related changes in a different way, which may be a result of different rates of migration and/or dispersal, likely higher in blue tits. Some impact may be also induced by interspecific competition. We suggest that changing the focus of urban genetic research from single to multiple species may provide novel insights into how natural populations respond to the processes of urbanization.
format	article
author	Marcin Markowski Piotr Minias Mirosława Bańbura Michał Glądalski Adam Kaliński Joanna Skwarska Jarosław Wawrzyniak Piotr Zieliński Jerzy Bańbura
author_facet	Marcin Markowski Piotr Minias Mirosława Bańbura Michał Glądalski Adam Kaliński Joanna Skwarska Jarosław Wawrzyniak Piotr Zieliński Jerzy Bańbura
author_sort	Marcin Markowski
title	Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species
title_short	Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species
title_full	Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species
title_fullStr	Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species
title_full_unstemmed	Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species
title_sort	genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/d9916895da774bbbb995e4897b77ad36
work_keys_str_mv	AT marcinmarkowski geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies AT piotrminias geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies AT mirosławabanbura geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies AT michałgladalski geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies AT adamkalinski geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies AT joannaskwarska geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies AT jarosławwawrzyniak geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies AT piotrzielinski geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies AT jerzybanbura geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies
_version_	1718385540930207744

Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species

Ejemplares similares