Why it is important to consider negative ties when studying polarized debates: A signed network analysis of a Dutch cultural controversy on Twitter.
Despite the prevalence of disagreement between users on social media platforms, studies of online debates typically only look at positive online interactions, represented as networks with positive ties. In this paper, we hypothesize that the systematic neglect of conflict that these network analyses...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Anna Keuchenius, Petter Törnberg, Justus Uitermark |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d99f8ab90bc14a00b3cc392e74c8cde0 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
#CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
por: Ashley M. Jackson, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Modeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society.
por: Petter Törnberg, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
An economic perspective on the legalisation debate: the Dutch case
por: Martijn A. Boermans
Publicado: (2010) -
The H5N1 Moratorium Controversy and Debate
por: Arturo Casadevall, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Ideological differences in engagement in public debate on Twitter.
por: Felix Gaisbauer, et al.
Publicado: (2021)