Why it is important to consider negative ties when studying polarized debates: A signed network analysis of a Dutch cultural controversy on Twitter.
Despite the prevalence of disagreement between users on social media platforms, studies of online debates typically only look at positive online interactions, represented as networks with positive ties. In this paper, we hypothesize that the systematic neglect of conflict that these network analyses...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Anna Keuchenius, Petter Törnberg, Justus Uitermark |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/d99f8ab90bc14a00b3cc392e74c8cde0 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
#CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
by: Ashley M. Jackson, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Modeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society.
by: Petter Törnberg, et al.
Published: (2021) -
An economic perspective on the legalisation debate: the Dutch case
by: Martijn A. Boermans
Published: (2010) -
The H5N1 Moratorium Controversy and Debate
by: Arturo Casadevall, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Ideological differences in engagement in public debate on Twitter.
by: Felix Gaisbauer, et al.
Published: (2021)