Why it is important to consider negative ties when studying polarized debates: A signed network analysis of a Dutch cultural controversy on Twitter.
Despite the prevalence of disagreement between users on social media platforms, studies of online debates typically only look at positive online interactions, represented as networks with positive ties. In this paper, we hypothesize that the systematic neglect of conflict that these network analyses...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Anna Keuchenius, Petter Törnberg, Justus Uitermark |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/d99f8ab90bc14a00b3cc392e74c8cde0 |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
#CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
par: Ashley M. Jackson, et autres
Publié: (2018) -
Modeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society.
par: Petter Törnberg, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
An economic perspective on the legalisation debate: the Dutch case
par: Martijn A. Boermans
Publié: (2010) -
The H5N1 Moratorium Controversy and Debate
par: Arturo Casadevall, et autres
Publié: (2012) -
Ideological differences in engagement in public debate on Twitter.
par: Felix Gaisbauer, et autres
Publié: (2021)