Clinical Performance of Samfilcon A, a Unique Silicone Hydrogel Lens, on a 7-Day Extended Wear Basis
William Reindel,1 Gary Mosehauer,1 Marjorie Rah,1 Howard Proskin,2 Robert Steffen1 1Vision Care, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Rochester, NY, USA; 2Howard M. Proskin & Associates, Rochester, NY, USACorrespondence: Marjorie RahVision Care, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Rochester,...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d9c5027b034844208f7a14c7e0b88804 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | William Reindel,1 Gary Mosehauer,1 Marjorie Rah,1 Howard Proskin,2 Robert Steffen1 1Vision Care, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Rochester, NY, USA; 2Howard M. Proskin & Associates, Rochester, NY, USACorrespondence: Marjorie RahVision Care, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Rochester, NY, USATel +1 585-413-6397Email Marjorie.Rah@bausch.comPurpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of samfilcon A, a unique, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-containing, silicone hydrogel contact lens with that of the balafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lens when worn on a 7-day extended wear basis.Subjects and Methods: A total of 669 subjects completed this 12-month, controlled, parallel group, masked, randomized study; of these, 340 wore samfilcon A lenses and 329 balafilcon A lenses. Subjects wore their respective assigned lenses bilaterally on a 7-day extended wear basis. On the seventh night of each wearing week, lenses were removed, cleaned, and disinfected using Biotrue multi-purpose solution (MPS), then re-inserted the following morning. Lenses were replaced with new lenses monthly. At each follow-up visit, investigators completed a slit lamp evaluation, and subjects rated lenses based upon a predefined set of performance criteria.Results: The samfilcon A lens performed comparably to the balafilcon A lens in terms of most graded and ungraded slit lamp findings, differing significantly only for corneal staining Grade 2 or greater, which favored samfilcon A, and anterior segment abnormalities, which favored balafilcon A. Subjects rated both lenses highly when queried about various lens-wearing characteristics. When comparing the number of subjects with findings on either eye on at least one follow-up visit, the two lenses were comparable in many aspects but favored samfilcon A with respect to cleanliness upon removal, overall comfort, comfort at end of day, dryness, vision, vision in low light, vision at end of day, and overall impression (all p < 0.05).Conclusion: While subjects rated both highly, samfilcon A lenses worn for 7-day extended wear and replaced on a monthly basis performed comparably to or better than balafilcon A lenses when worn for the same 7-day wear time and replacement cycle.Keywords: PVP, contact lens, extended wear |
|---|