The Drake Passage opening from an experimental fluid dynamics point of view

Abstract Pronounced global cooling around the Eocene–Oligocene transition (EOT) was a pivotal event in Earth’s climate history, controversially associated with the opening of the Drake Passage. Using a physical laboratory model we revisit the fluid dynamics of this marked reorganization of ocean cir...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miklós Vincze, Tamás Bozóki, Mátyás Herein, Ion Dan Borcia, Uwe Harlander, Attila Horicsányi, Anita Nyerges, Costanza Rodda, András Pál, József Pálfy
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d9dac58e531c45aa98610cc6c8b262e4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d9dac58e531c45aa98610cc6c8b262e4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d9dac58e531c45aa98610cc6c8b262e42021-12-02T19:16:19ZThe Drake Passage opening from an experimental fluid dynamics point of view10.1038/s41598-021-99123-02045-2322https://doaj.org/article/d9dac58e531c45aa98610cc6c8b262e42021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99123-0https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Pronounced global cooling around the Eocene–Oligocene transition (EOT) was a pivotal event in Earth’s climate history, controversially associated with the opening of the Drake Passage. Using a physical laboratory model we revisit the fluid dynamics of this marked reorganization of ocean circulation. Here we show, seemingly contradicting paleoclimate records, that in our experiments opening the pathway yields higher values of mean water surface temperature than the “closed” configuration. This mismatch points to the importance of the role ice albedo feedback plays in the investigated EOT-like transition, a component that is not captured in the laboratory model. Our conclusion is supported by numerical simulations performed in a global climate model (GCM) of intermediate complexity, where both “closed” and “open” configurations were explored, with and without active sea ice dynamics. The GCM results indicate that sea surface temperatures would change in the opposite direction following an opening event in the two sea ice dynamics settings, and the results are therefore consistent both with the laboratory experiment (slight warming after opening) and the paleoclimatic data (pronounced cooling after opening). It follows that in the hypothetical case of an initially ice-free Antarctica the continent could have become even warmer after the opening, a scenario not indicated by paleotemperature reconstructions.Miklós VinczeTamás BozókiMátyás HereinIon Dan BorciaUwe HarlanderAttila HoricsányiAnita NyergesCostanza RoddaAndrás PálJózsef PálfyNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Miklós Vincze
Tamás Bozóki
Mátyás Herein
Ion Dan Borcia
Uwe Harlander
Attila Horicsányi
Anita Nyerges
Costanza Rodda
András Pál
József Pálfy
The Drake Passage opening from an experimental fluid dynamics point of view
description Abstract Pronounced global cooling around the Eocene–Oligocene transition (EOT) was a pivotal event in Earth’s climate history, controversially associated with the opening of the Drake Passage. Using a physical laboratory model we revisit the fluid dynamics of this marked reorganization of ocean circulation. Here we show, seemingly contradicting paleoclimate records, that in our experiments opening the pathway yields higher values of mean water surface temperature than the “closed” configuration. This mismatch points to the importance of the role ice albedo feedback plays in the investigated EOT-like transition, a component that is not captured in the laboratory model. Our conclusion is supported by numerical simulations performed in a global climate model (GCM) of intermediate complexity, where both “closed” and “open” configurations were explored, with and without active sea ice dynamics. The GCM results indicate that sea surface temperatures would change in the opposite direction following an opening event in the two sea ice dynamics settings, and the results are therefore consistent both with the laboratory experiment (slight warming after opening) and the paleoclimatic data (pronounced cooling after opening). It follows that in the hypothetical case of an initially ice-free Antarctica the continent could have become even warmer after the opening, a scenario not indicated by paleotemperature reconstructions.
format article
author Miklós Vincze
Tamás Bozóki
Mátyás Herein
Ion Dan Borcia
Uwe Harlander
Attila Horicsányi
Anita Nyerges
Costanza Rodda
András Pál
József Pálfy
author_facet Miklós Vincze
Tamás Bozóki
Mátyás Herein
Ion Dan Borcia
Uwe Harlander
Attila Horicsányi
Anita Nyerges
Costanza Rodda
András Pál
József Pálfy
author_sort Miklós Vincze
title The Drake Passage opening from an experimental fluid dynamics point of view
title_short The Drake Passage opening from an experimental fluid dynamics point of view
title_full The Drake Passage opening from an experimental fluid dynamics point of view
title_fullStr The Drake Passage opening from an experimental fluid dynamics point of view
title_full_unstemmed The Drake Passage opening from an experimental fluid dynamics point of view
title_sort drake passage opening from an experimental fluid dynamics point of view
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d9dac58e531c45aa98610cc6c8b262e4
work_keys_str_mv AT miklosvincze thedrakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT tamasbozoki thedrakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT matyasherein thedrakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT iondanborcia thedrakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT uweharlander thedrakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT attilahoricsanyi thedrakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT anitanyerges thedrakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT costanzarodda thedrakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT andraspal thedrakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT jozsefpalfy thedrakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT miklosvincze drakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT tamasbozoki drakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT matyasherein drakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT iondanborcia drakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT uweharlander drakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT attilahoricsanyi drakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT anitanyerges drakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT costanzarodda drakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT andraspal drakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
AT jozsefpalfy drakepassageopeningfromanexperimentalfluiddynamicspointofview
_version_ 1718377000273444864