Sportwissenschaft

Background: Low back pain (LBP) has a high priority in our predominately sedentary society. The aim of this meta-analysis of present data was to evaluate the effect of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on LBP in sedentary older people with relevant pain.Methods: The present analysis based on...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weissenfels A, Teschler M, von Stengel S, Kohl M, Kemmler W
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
Publicado: Dynamic Media Sales Verlag 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d9e9ca5652474e09b410ce8164088b84
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d9e9ca5652474e09b410ce8164088b84
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d9e9ca5652474e09b410ce8164088b842021-11-16T19:01:41ZSportwissenschaft0344-59252510-526410.5960/dzsm.2017.302https://doaj.org/article/d9e9ca5652474e09b410ce8164088b842017-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.germanjournalsportsmedicine.com/archive/archive-2017/heft-12/effects-of-whole-body-electromyostimulation-on-low-back-pain-a-review-of-the-evidence/https://doaj.org/toc/0344-5925https://doaj.org/toc/2510-5264Background: Low back pain (LBP) has a high priority in our predominately sedentary society. The aim of this meta-analysis of present data was to evaluate the effect of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on LBP in sedentary older people with relevant pain.Methods: The present analysis based on four recently-conducted randomized controlled WB-EMS trials (RCT). All of the trials included participants 60 years+ and used WB-EMS-protocols with comparable stimulation parameters (1.5 sessions/week, 16-25min/session, bipolar, 85Hz, 350s, 4-6s impulse/4sec impulse-break) applied for 14-52 weeks. All the studies defined strength as a primary or secondary study-endpoint. We included only subjects with relevant LBP frequency in the present analysis (5 on a 0-7 scale). Ofthe 36 men (n=11) and women (n=25) sampled, 17 were participants ina WB-EMS-group and 19 subjects were in the corresponding control group (CG). Results: At baseline, no group differences with respect to LBP intensity and frequency were observed. Pain intensity improved significantly in the WB-EMS (p<.001) and did not change (p=.834) in the CG. Group differences for pain intensity were significant (p=.012). LBP frequency,however,improved significantly in the WB-EMS (p<.001) and the CG (p=.042). Differences between WBEMS and CG were borderline non-significant (p=.050).Conclusion: WB-EMS appears to be an effective training tool for reducing LBP. Nonetheless, effectiveness, feasibility and sustainability of this training technology should be addressed more intensivelyby further, more dedicated RCTs.KEY WORDS: Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain, WB-Electromyostimulation, Pain Intensity and Frequency, Resistance ExerciseWeissenfels ATeschler Mvon Stengel SKohl MKemmler WDynamic Media Sales VerlagarticleSports medicineRC1200-1245DEENDeutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin, Vol 68, Iss 12 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
topic Sports medicine
RC1200-1245
spellingShingle Sports medicine
RC1200-1245
Weissenfels A
Teschler M
von Stengel S
Kohl M
Kemmler W
Sportwissenschaft
description Background: Low back pain (LBP) has a high priority in our predominately sedentary society. The aim of this meta-analysis of present data was to evaluate the effect of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on LBP in sedentary older people with relevant pain.Methods: The present analysis based on four recently-conducted randomized controlled WB-EMS trials (RCT). All of the trials included participants 60 years+ and used WB-EMS-protocols with comparable stimulation parameters (1.5 sessions/week, 16-25min/session, bipolar, 85Hz, 350s, 4-6s impulse/4sec impulse-break) applied for 14-52 weeks. All the studies defined strength as a primary or secondary study-endpoint. We included only subjects with relevant LBP frequency in the present analysis (5 on a 0-7 scale). Ofthe 36 men (n=11) and women (n=25) sampled, 17 were participants ina WB-EMS-group and 19 subjects were in the corresponding control group (CG). Results: At baseline, no group differences with respect to LBP intensity and frequency were observed. Pain intensity improved significantly in the WB-EMS (p<.001) and did not change (p=.834) in the CG. Group differences for pain intensity were significant (p=.012). LBP frequency,however,improved significantly in the WB-EMS (p<.001) and the CG (p=.042). Differences between WBEMS and CG were borderline non-significant (p=.050).Conclusion: WB-EMS appears to be an effective training tool for reducing LBP. Nonetheless, effectiveness, feasibility and sustainability of this training technology should be addressed more intensivelyby further, more dedicated RCTs.KEY WORDS: Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain, WB-Electromyostimulation, Pain Intensity and Frequency, Resistance Exercise
format article
author Weissenfels A
Teschler M
von Stengel S
Kohl M
Kemmler W
author_facet Weissenfels A
Teschler M
von Stengel S
Kohl M
Kemmler W
author_sort Weissenfels A
title Sportwissenschaft
title_short Sportwissenschaft
title_full Sportwissenschaft
title_fullStr Sportwissenschaft
title_full_unstemmed Sportwissenschaft
title_sort sportwissenschaft
publisher Dynamic Media Sales Verlag
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/d9e9ca5652474e09b410ce8164088b84
work_keys_str_mv AT weissenfelsa sportwissenschaft
AT teschlerm sportwissenschaft
AT vonstengels sportwissenschaft
AT kohlm sportwissenschaft
AT kemmlerw sportwissenschaft
_version_ 1718426206810931200