Sportwissenschaft
Background: Low back pain (LBP) has a high priority in our predominately sedentary society. The aim of this meta-analysis of present data was to evaluate the effect of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on LBP in sedentary older people with relevant pain.Methods: The present analysis based on...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | DE EN |
Publicado: |
Dynamic Media Sales Verlag
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d9e9ca5652474e09b410ce8164088b84 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d9e9ca5652474e09b410ce8164088b84 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d9e9ca5652474e09b410ce8164088b842021-11-16T19:01:41ZSportwissenschaft0344-59252510-526410.5960/dzsm.2017.302https://doaj.org/article/d9e9ca5652474e09b410ce8164088b842017-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.germanjournalsportsmedicine.com/archive/archive-2017/heft-12/effects-of-whole-body-electromyostimulation-on-low-back-pain-a-review-of-the-evidence/https://doaj.org/toc/0344-5925https://doaj.org/toc/2510-5264Background: Low back pain (LBP) has a high priority in our predominately sedentary society. The aim of this meta-analysis of present data was to evaluate the effect of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on LBP in sedentary older people with relevant pain.Methods: The present analysis based on four recently-conducted randomized controlled WB-EMS trials (RCT). All of the trials included participants 60 years+ and used WB-EMS-protocols with comparable stimulation parameters (1.5 sessions/week, 16-25min/session, bipolar, 85Hz, 350s, 4-6s impulse/4sec impulse-break) applied for 14-52 weeks. All the studies defined strength as a primary or secondary study-endpoint. We included only subjects with relevant LBP frequency in the present analysis (5 on a 0-7 scale). Ofthe 36 men (n=11) and women (n=25) sampled, 17 were participants ina WB-EMS-group and 19 subjects were in the corresponding control group (CG). Results: At baseline, no group differences with respect to LBP intensity and frequency were observed. Pain intensity improved significantly in the WB-EMS (p<.001) and did not change (p=.834) in the CG. Group differences for pain intensity were significant (p=.012). LBP frequency,however,improved significantly in the WB-EMS (p<.001) and the CG (p=.042). Differences between WBEMS and CG were borderline non-significant (p=.050).Conclusion: WB-EMS appears to be an effective training tool for reducing LBP. Nonetheless, effectiveness, feasibility and sustainability of this training technology should be addressed more intensivelyby further, more dedicated RCTs.KEY WORDS: Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain, WB-Electromyostimulation, Pain Intensity and Frequency, Resistance ExerciseWeissenfels ATeschler Mvon Stengel SKohl MKemmler WDynamic Media Sales VerlagarticleSports medicineRC1200-1245DEENDeutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin, Vol 68, Iss 12 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
DE EN |
topic |
Sports medicine RC1200-1245 |
spellingShingle |
Sports medicine RC1200-1245 Weissenfels A Teschler M von Stengel S Kohl M Kemmler W Sportwissenschaft |
description |
Background: Low back pain (LBP) has a high priority in our predominately sedentary society. The aim of this meta-analysis of present data was to evaluate the effect of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on LBP in sedentary older people with relevant pain.Methods: The present analysis based on four recently-conducted randomized controlled WB-EMS trials (RCT). All of the trials included participants 60 years+ and used WB-EMS-protocols with comparable stimulation parameters (1.5 sessions/week, 16-25min/session, bipolar, 85Hz, 350s, 4-6s impulse/4sec impulse-break) applied for 14-52 weeks. All the studies defined strength as a primary or secondary study-endpoint. We included only subjects with relevant LBP frequency in the present analysis (5 on a 0-7 scale). Ofthe 36 men (n=11) and women (n=25) sampled, 17 were participants ina WB-EMS-group and 19 subjects were in the corresponding control group (CG). Results: At baseline, no group differences with respect to LBP intensity and frequency were observed. Pain intensity improved significantly in the WB-EMS (p<.001) and did not change (p=.834) in the CG. Group differences for pain intensity were significant (p=.012). LBP frequency,however,improved significantly in the WB-EMS (p<.001) and the CG (p=.042). Differences between WBEMS and CG were borderline non-significant (p=.050).Conclusion: WB-EMS appears to be an effective training tool for reducing LBP. Nonetheless, effectiveness, feasibility and sustainability of this training technology should be addressed more intensivelyby further, more dedicated RCTs.KEY WORDS: Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain, WB-Electromyostimulation, Pain Intensity and Frequency, Resistance Exercise |
format |
article |
author |
Weissenfels A Teschler M von Stengel S Kohl M Kemmler W |
author_facet |
Weissenfels A Teschler M von Stengel S Kohl M Kemmler W |
author_sort |
Weissenfels A |
title |
Sportwissenschaft |
title_short |
Sportwissenschaft |
title_full |
Sportwissenschaft |
title_fullStr |
Sportwissenschaft |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sportwissenschaft |
title_sort |
sportwissenschaft |
publisher |
Dynamic Media Sales Verlag |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d9e9ca5652474e09b410ce8164088b84 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT weissenfelsa sportwissenschaft AT teschlerm sportwissenschaft AT vonstengels sportwissenschaft AT kohlm sportwissenschaft AT kemmlerw sportwissenschaft |
_version_ |
1718426206810931200 |